[cryptome] Re: Crypto Vulns

  • From: "Douglas Rankine" <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 18:51:45 -0000

Yup! But for all of that, I wouldn't send you 10 bucks unless it was
guaranteed to get to you, or else me money was credited back to me
account...:-).  I don't mind the banks using crypto whether it be bitcon and
secure links as long as they take the responsibility for transferring me
money over to whom I sent it.  If it don't get there, then they refund it to
me, pronto, just as they do now.

I would also like them to respect my privacy and not give out my details
without my written permission.  And I would also like the government to tell
me first, before they go looking for a search warrant from a justice of the
peace, or interfering with me computer without me permission.  And I would
like them all to take responsibility and compensate me if they get it wrong,
or damage my equipment. I don't think that is too much to ask...

But as the ploughman said to the wee mousie in "To a Mouse" when the we
mousie asked to have his nest preserved..."It's a sma' request..."...:-).

Far better to transact through smoke and mirrors, methinks.

-----Original Message-----
From: cryptome-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cryptome-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of John Young
Sent: 07 March 2015 15:24
To: cryptography@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
cryptography@xxxxxxxxxxxx; cypherpunks@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cryptome] Crypto Vulns

No 1 vulnerability of crypto is the user 2nd passphrases 3rd overconfidence
4th trust in the producer 5th believing backdoors are No. 1

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 4284/9244 - Release Date: 03/07/15

Other related posts: