Re: USF4 changes!

  • From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 19:04:07 +0200

My 5c ~ I know I'm flakey but I will be there for the 5v5

The games Jag mentioned are the best choice and just as an irl host we
should cater to the guys coming here and let them decide the games.
If doing all the 5v5's in 1 match format pokemon style there may be enough
time to still run a combined mystery bracket.

C-Rayz is probably the best sounding rapper alive -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVVD9cDo2PI


On 16 May 2014 18:57, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> LB you are cowarding from participating so you have no say.
>
>
>
> On 16 May 2014 18:29, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> No LB just no.
>>
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:24 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > i am very sane.
>> >
>> > in my mind was that this was supposed to be a fun event, not who is
>> better
>> > CT or JHB.
>> >
>> > having a team battle in the way we have been having them, winner stays
>> on is
>> > the hype format. we must have 5 games to prevent a draw in the 5th
>> mystery
>> > game. TBH and i dont mean any offense here , JHB will be totally and
>> utterly
>> > destroyed if we play kof. having total destruction is bad and unhype , i
>> > dont want to see that happen.
>> >
>> > marvel is up for grabs where my team ive chosen is fairly proficent in
>> > SF is kinda okay as well not too op from our side
>> > BB can be interesting as Ragna is pretty strong and could reverse OCV
>> the
>> > team.
>> > KOF is gna be kuk unhype and boring to watch.
>> >
>> > rather play DOA where its kinda neutral to both sides. Im all for 2d
>> games
>> > but this is ridiculous, we need some 3d in there as well.
>> > the 5th mystery game can be the decider.
>> >
>> > The even is supposed to be fun, i dont wana sound like raphoman here ,
>> but
>> > please remember it.
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:13:43 +0200
>> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >
>> > Is Salie still around the 28th of June? Maybe running the tournament a
>> bit
>> > earlier isn't a bad idea if it's an option at all. It's not like one's
>> game
>> > is going to increase that much in the span of a week or two either way
>> :P
>> >
>> > Round robin, all games, first to three could work? Doing everything in
>> one
>> > day would be first prize, spanning it over two Saturdays would be second
>> > prize.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > That's precisely why I'm asking if everyone is ok with those dates. If
>> > people feel that more than one day will be required to get through
>> > everything, or that it needs to happen earlier, now's the time to say
>> so.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Aren't we going need more time for the qualifiers?
>> > It's 4 games after all.
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >> I also need to know if everyone is ok with the dates I've tabled:
>> >>
>> >> 19 July - Qualifier
>> >> 26 July - Exhibition
>> >>
>> >> Gives everyone ample time to prepare and Salie will be back from Japan
>> >> before the 19th, so he'll also be able to participate.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I think we should settle it as soon as possible so tomorrow is fine
>> for
>> >>> me.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > We haven't reached a decision on that yet. Perhaps we can decide on
>> a
>> >>> > suitable format for the exhibition tomorrow?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> How exactly will the exhibition work?  Does each member compete
>> >>> >> against
>> >>> >> the rest in every game?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:00 PM, lindsey kiviets
>> >>> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> whats the fastest way to unlock o Joseph and Hol?
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:56:33 +0200
>> >>> >>> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >>> >>> > From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > Some Jojo's action!
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAfwndDsdsg
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > Dio Brando's jump cancel shenanigans are super effective!
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:43 PM, lindsey kiviets
>> >>> >>> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >>> > > I did an adjustment, I think its best team like this as stu
>> has
>> >>> >>> > > much
>> >>> >>> > > more
>> >>> >>> > > kof background.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > tbh, I dunno why kof is even on the list. I request kof to be
>> >>> >>> > > changed
>> >>> >>> > > to DOA
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > ________________________________
>> >>> >>> > > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:40:13 +0200
>> >>> >>> > > Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >>> >>> > > From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > What happened to Richard's name?
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > On 16 May 2014 12:29, "lindsey kiviets" <
>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >>> > > wrote:
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > I have already adjusted my list
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > SAP
>> >>> >>> > > Lumi
>> >>> >>> > > Manase
>> >>> >>> > > Stu
>> >>> >>> > > Nick
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > ________________________________
>> >>> >>> > > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:28:12 +0200
>> >>> >>> > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >>> >>> > > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > Someone should fill Stu in on CPT vs JHB.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
>> >>> >>> > > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > Yeah, souflaki and stuff. All good. The Greek version is
>> tastier
>> >>> >>> > > than
>> >>> >>> > > the
>> >>> >>> > > Cypriot one.
>> >>> >>> > > Lots of mezze meals. Apparently the wine there is pretty good.
>> >>> >>> > > I’m
>> >>> >>> > > not
>> >>> >>> > > really in a position to judge that one.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> >>> >>> > > Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>> >>> >>> > > Sent: 16 May 2014 12:11 PM
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > > Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > Lol.
>> >>> >>> > > I was hoping for a more interesting answer, but I'll take
>> what I
>> >>> >>> > > get.
>> >>> >>> > > Welcome back bro.
>> >>> >>> > > On 16 May 2014 12:06, "Donaldson, Alasdair"
>> >>> >>> > > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >>> > > wrote:
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > Uh, yes? I was in Cyprus. Pretty happy and cheerful place.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> >>> >>> > > Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>> >>> >>> > > Sent: 16 May 2014 12:03 PM
>> >>> >>> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > > Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > @Stu
>> >>> >>> > > Find anything good to eat?
>> >>> >>> > > On 16 May 2014 12:01, "Donaldson, Alasdair"
>> >>> >>> > > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >>> > > wrote:
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > Thanks guys. Good to be back in country.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> >>> >>> > > Behalf Of Ryan Williams
>> >>> >>> > > Sent: 16 May 2014 11:59 AM
>> >>> >>> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >>> > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > Welcome back bro :)
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Ilitirit Sama
>> >>> >>> > > <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >>> > > wrote:
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > WB Stu.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > ________________________________
>> >>> >>> > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>> legally
>> >>> >>> > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to
>> >>> >>> > > this
>> >>> >>> > > e-mail
>> >>> >>> > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>> >>> >>> > > communication in
>> >>> >>> > > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in
>> >>> >>> > > error,"
>> >>> >>> > > send to
>> >>> >>> > > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
>> >>> >>> > > copies
>> >>> >>> > > of
>> >>> >>> > > it. If
>> >>> >>> > > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> >>> >>> > > distribution or
>> >>> >>> > > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>> >>> >>> > > prohibited and
>> >>> >>> > > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail
>> >>> >>> > > are
>> >>> >>> > > subject
>> >>> >>> > > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG
>> >>> >>> > > client
>> >>> >>> > > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>> information in
>> >>> >>> > > this
>> >>> >>> > > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> >>> >>> > > business of
>> >>> >>> > > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> >>> >>> > > error-free,
>> >>> >>> > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> >>> >>> > > destroyed,
>> >>> >>> > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>> >>> >>> > > ("KPMG
>> >>> >>> > > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
>> providing
>> >>> >>> > > services
>> >>> >>> > > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
>> is
>> >>> >>> > > a
>> >>> >>> > > Swiss
>> >>> >>> > > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>> >>> >>> > > independent
>> >>> >>> > > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>> provides
>> >>> >>> > > no
>> >>> >>> > > services
>> >>> >>> > > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
>> legally
>> >>> >>> > > distinct and
>> >>> >>> > > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> >>> >>> > > about
>> >>> >>> > > the
>> >>> >>> > > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
>> be
>> >>> >>> > > obtained
>> >>> >>> > > from your KPMG representative.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
>> >>> >>> > > swept
>> >>> >>> > > by
>> >>> >>> > > AntiVirus software.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > ________________________________
>> >>> >>> > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>> legally
>> >>> >>> > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to
>> >>> >>> > > this
>> >>> >>> > > e-mail
>> >>> >>> > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>> >>> >>> > > communication in
>> >>> >>> > > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in
>> >>> >>> > > error,"
>> >>> >>> > > send to
>> >>> >>> > > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
>> >>> >>> > > copies
>> >>> >>> > > of
>> >>> >>> > > it. If
>> >>> >>> > > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> >>> >>> > > distribution or
>> >>> >>> > > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>> >>> >>> > > prohibited and
>> >>> >>> > > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail
>> >>> >>> > > are
>> >>> >>> > > subject
>> >>> >>> > > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG
>> >>> >>> > > client
>> >>> >>> > > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>> information in
>> >>> >>> > > this
>> >>> >>> > > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> >>> >>> > > business of
>> >>> >>> > > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> >>> >>> > > error-free,
>> >>> >>> > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> >>> >>> > > destroyed,
>> >>> >>> > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>> >>> >>> > > ("KPMG
>> >>> >>> > > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
>> providing
>> >>> >>> > > services
>> >>> >>> > > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
>> is
>> >>> >>> > > a
>> >>> >>> > > Swiss
>> >>> >>> > > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>> >>> >>> > > independent
>> >>> >>> > > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>> provides
>> >>> >>> > > no
>> >>> >>> > > services
>> >>> >>> > > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
>> legally
>> >>> >>> > > distinct and
>> >>> >>> > > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> >>> >>> > > about
>> >>> >>> > > the
>> >>> >>> > > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
>> be
>> >>> >>> > > obtained
>> >>> >>> > > from your KPMG representative.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
>> >>> >>> > > swept
>> >>> >>> > > by
>> >>> >>> > > AntiVirus software.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > ________________________________
>> >>> >>> > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>> legally
>> >>> >>> > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to
>> >>> >>> > > this
>> >>> >>> > > e-mail
>> >>> >>> > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>> >>> >>> > > communication in
>> >>> >>> > > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in
>> >>> >>> > > error,"
>> >>> >>> > > send to
>> >>> >>> > > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
>> >>> >>> > > copies
>> >>> >>> > > of
>> >>> >>> > > it. If
>> >>> >>> > > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> >>> >>> > > distribution or
>> >>> >>> > > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>> >>> >>> > > prohibited and
>> >>> >>> > > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail
>> >>> >>> > > are
>> >>> >>> > > subject
>> >>> >>> > > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG
>> >>> >>> > > client
>> >>> >>> > > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>> information in
>> >>> >>> > > this
>> >>> >>> > > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> >>> >>> > > business of
>> >>> >>> > > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> >>> >>> > > error-free,
>> >>> >>> > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> >>> >>> > > destroyed,
>> >>> >>> > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>> >>> >>> > > ("KPMG
>> >>> >>> > > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
>> providing
>> >>> >>> > > services
>> >>> >>> > > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
>> is
>> >>> >>> > > a
>> >>> >>> > > Swiss
>> >>> >>> > > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>> >>> >>> > > independent
>> >>> >>> > > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>> provides
>> >>> >>> > > no
>> >>> >>> > > services
>> >>> >>> > > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
>> legally
>> >>> >>> > > distinct and
>> >>> >>> > > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> >>> >>> > > about
>> >>> >>> > > the
>> >>> >>> > > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
>> be
>> >>> >>> > > obtained
>> >>> >>> > > from your KPMG representative.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
>> >>> >>> > > swept
>> >>> >>> > > by
>> >>> >>> > > AntiVirus software.
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > >
>> >>> >>> > ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town
>> >>> >>> > Fighting
>> >>> >>> > Game Community mailing list.
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>> list.
>> >>>
>> >>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>> >>
>> >>
>> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>> list.
>> >
>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>
>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>
>
>

Other related posts: