Dassies and Penguins are awesome *lol* On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Went and saw the penguin and dassie colonies today. Snoozing merrily in > the sun. All good. > *From*: richard moorcroft [mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx] > *Sent*: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 06:40 PM South Africa Standard Time > *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes! > > > I am sure he would not do that.. LB hates losing but loves winning too much > On Jul 23, 2014 6:38 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I thought I heard that in order to compensate for the absence of Yann >> they could let one of their players go twice? >> >> Doesn't matter though. LB still wouldn't step up. He's too scared. >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:46 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> im not in the 5v5, because there isnt a 5v5. its 4v4. >>> >>> 4 of our best vs 4 of theirs. >>> >>> lumi >>> sap >>> hl >>> gb >>> >>> vs >>> >>> ragna >>> jag >>> dmfu360 >>> ecco >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:15:05 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! >>> From: ngoyrodrigue@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> >>> LMAO >>> On 23 Jul 2014 1:55 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> LB ... yes ! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 23 July 2014 13:48, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Me >>> Lumi >>> HL >>> LB >>> GB >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Stephen Scheidel < >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Who is in the CPT team ? >>> >>> >>> On 23 July 2014 13:19, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> That smoking thing is utter dog shit. >>> If someone smokes themselves finished then it's their fault. >>> wife is just taking chances and got lucky. >>> >>> I wonder how they estimated the value of the dudes life. >>> >>> On 23/07/2014, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > mixing with the enemy will kill the hype... :/ >>> > If mixing must occur I suggest heavy sandbagging. >>> > >>> > On 23/07/2014, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >> Yeah, read about this. Why should the company be held liable? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> This is one of the most absurd verdicts I've read in a while: >>> >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-28389273 >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm all for a smoke-free lifestyle but come on... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Ryan Williams < >>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Really like the sprite work. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>> > >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlL_MNq2W9A >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >