Re: USF4 changes!

  • From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:45:51 +0200

Dassies and Penguins are awesome *lol*


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Went and saw the penguin and dassie colonies today. Snoozing merrily in
> the sun. All good.
>  *From*: richard moorcroft [mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 06:40 PM South Africa Standard Time
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
> I am sure he would not do that.. LB hates losing but loves winning too much
> On Jul 23, 2014 6:38 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  I thought I heard that in order to compensate for the absence of Yann
>> they could let one of their players go twice?
>>
>>  Doesn't matter though.  LB still wouldn't step up.  He's too scared.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:46 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  im not in the 5v5, because there isnt a 5v5. its 4v4.
>>>
>>> 4 of our best vs 4 of theirs.
>>>
>>> lumi
>>> sap
>>> hl
>>> gb
>>>
>>> vs
>>>
>>> ragna
>>> jag
>>> dmfu360
>>> ecco
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:15:05 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> From: ngoyrodrigue@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>> LMAO
>>> On 23 Jul 2014 1:55 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> LB ... yes !
>>>
>>>
>>>  ​
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23 July 2014 13:48, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Me
>>> Lumi
>>> HL
>>> LB
>>> GB
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Who is in the CPT team ?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23 July 2014 13:19, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> That smoking thing is utter dog shit.
>>> If someone smokes themselves finished then it's their fault.
>>> wife is just taking chances and got lucky.
>>>
>>> I wonder how they estimated the value of the dudes life.
>>>
>>> On 23/07/2014, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > mixing with the enemy will kill the hype...  :/
>>> > If mixing must occur I suggest heavy sandbagging.
>>> >
>>> > On 23/07/2014, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> Yeah, read about this. Why should the company be held liable?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> This is one of the most absurd verdicts I've read in a while:
>>> >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-28389273
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'm all for a smoke-free lifestyle but come on...
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Ryan Williams <
>>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Really like the sprite work.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlL_MNq2W9A
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>   ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>

JPEG image

Other related posts: