I'm still taking Monday off. Could use a day off. We're pretty much sorted with the hot choc. A better option would be to bring along a mug or some paper cups. I'll bring my heater. On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cool. I’ll be there for as long as possible. This time I’ll bring warmer > clothes. And hot choc. > > I had this Friday and the following Monday booked off work, but I think > I’ll need to cancel those – too much stuff to do here. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams > *Sent:* 08 July 2014 11:13 AM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! > > > > Jeeva's is the best option we've got at the mo. I don't think many of us > will stay too late so no chance of a sleepover (too damn cold there > anyway), but I could do 1am at the latest before I bounce. I'm ok with > being there on Sunday as well if there's enough interest from other peeps, > although I'll probably leave earlier (say around 10-11pm) At the very > least, we should be able to check out as many quality matches as possible > before we call it a night. > > > > I think the main reason Jeeva had an issue the last time with the noise > levels is because he had people over who were trying to sleep. Shouldn't > really be an issue this time around. > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Got distracted playing Lost Vikings again the other day. It’s cute. > > > > BTW, Evo is this weekend right? I’m guessing we’re not organising > anything. Can we do Jeeva’s if we promise to be really quiet? > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams > *Sent:* 08 July 2014 9:04 AM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! > > > > Nice :) Yeah, those old Dos games are rather unforgiving :P > > > > Tried some Mechwarrior 2 on Dosbox a few months ago. The game may not have > aged well visually but it still makes you feel like you're the pilot of a > 50-foot behemoth :P I remember seeing the game for the first time at a > friends house back in the day and how the mech powered up. Blew my mind. > Been in love with Mech/Mecha games ever since :) I wish someone would > revive the genre :( > > > > I still need to try Tie-Fighter. I remember reading that it was one of the > best flight sims of its day. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Played a bit of Rastan the other day. Was messing around on Dosbox. Good > times. > > Too many of those games are bloody hard now. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams > *Sent:* 08 July 2014 7:44 AM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! > > > > @the Steam heads, if you're into old-school classics like Rastan Saga, > Ghouls and Ghosts and Castlevania, do yourselves a favour and get Volgarr > the Viking. Game is legit! > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Well, notable Akuma players like Infiltration and Tokido haven't dropped > him in USF4. > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:18 AM, richard moorcroft < > greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Do you think if they buffed up akuma again would it make former players > come back to him?? Just a tiny little buff that's all > > On Jul 8, 2014 12:23 AM, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Leave vanilla SF4 Akuma alone. lol > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > *lol* > > > > > http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/jul/07/vanilla-akuma-cares-not-zangiefs-green-hand-hits-twice-can-absorb-both-hits-his-focus-attack-ultra-street-fighter-4/ > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nah son, It's called training mode. > > I pick a character I want to train with and then I pick a punching bag > character randomly. > > After that I go through the combos/block strings, safe jump set up options > I know and somehow discover these things during training. > > I'm not specifically looking for anything specific I just want to know if > my combos work on all characters and if not I then adjust accordingly. > > Nothing special there. > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:24 PM, richard moorcroft < > greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I see you like fishing for glitches it's a very nice hobby > > On Jul 7, 2014 7:25 PM, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I found another glitch in USF4 :D > > It's Yun's red focus combo, it fails against a crouching Rose... > > MP xx LP shoulder xx red focus, the focus get's blocked 100% of the time > by a crouching Rose but works if she is standing. > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Yup. Capcom knows what they're doing man. > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Poor E. Honda, > > > > > http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/jul/06/e-honda-has-hard-time-getting-handy-himself-ultra-street-fighter-4-stlp-hands-misses-point-blank/ > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It’s like the Pringles tagline… > > Once you clop, you can’t stop. > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir > *Sent:* 07 July 2014 3:02 PM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! > > > > At least mine is humanoid. > > Equine-lover-boy. > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What will Nick’s 2d waifu think now? > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft > *Sent:* 07 July 2014 2:16 PM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! > > > > Ashraf I think that is the wrong answer > > On Jul 7, 2014 1:33 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's actually an old interest but the difference this time around is > that it has taken corporeal form :P > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:29 PM, richard moorcroft < > greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What is your new interest??? > > On Jul 7, 2014 1:01 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > *LOL* Before long, we won't see you at the sessions either :P > > > > In all seriousness though, if it pans out, I'm happy for you bro :) > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < > nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Good stuff man. > Haven't been too invested in the mails, I have another interest now. > :P > > On 7 Jul 2014 11:26, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Slow day on the mails. > > > > Our division moved to a new department last week. Got a chance to meet > with the Executive Director (our new boss) to discuss the way forward > (considering that I've resigned). Something that cracked me up was that an > instruction had been issued by my former boss to revoke my access rights to > the network on account of my resignation. The new boss was a bit miffed > that I no longer have admin access to the network as it essentially means > that I can't work *lol* > > > > I do still have a few things that need to be completed (mostly > documentation) which I'll be prioritising this week. Need to do a proper > handover of my current responsibilities to the gentleman who will manage > the department in my stead. Once that's over though, I'll just be chilling > until the end of the month :P Will still try to help out where I can and > answer questions, etc, but that'll be the extent of my involvement once the > handover is finalised. I've drafted procedural documentation for the > juniors so they should be fine. Man, I cannot wait to leave this place :) > Not too much longer now until I'm a free man! It feels like I'm being > released from prison *lol* > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > 10 hours. > > U 'aving a laugh m8. > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Power to Nemo! > > > > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Yo D tier *lol* > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQkG5NefXMM > > > > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Oh and hitbox issues. lol > > > > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A-cho is in Kyoto. I'm in Tokyo. I don't have plans to go there. > > This interview touches on many reasons I don't like USF4 > http://www.4gamer.net/games/225/G022539/20140704102/ > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:40 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > thick asian ftw > > did you goto a-cho yet? > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 02:30:57 +0900 > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Sup guys. > > Sitting in an awesome Internet/Comic Cafe at the moment at 2:30am. This > place is amazing. It even has shower rooms for people who pull > all-nighters. Tokyo is awesome. They had a live Super Mario Kart race in > Harajuku today. I don't think LB would ever wanna leave Yoyogi park on a > Sunday. Thick asians cosplaying Shrine Maidens all day. Having said that, > about 70% of those thick asians are male. I don't think LB would notice > though. Gonna check out Akihabara tomorrow. > > About USF4: Let's just say I think the game sucks even more than I did > before. More on that some other time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >