Re: USF4 changes!

  • From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:29:29 +0200

I'm still taking Monday off. Could use a day off.

We're pretty much sorted with the hot choc. A better option would be to
bring along a mug or some paper cups.

I'll bring my heater.


On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Cool. I’ll be there for as long as possible. This time I’ll bring warmer
> clothes. And hot choc.
>
> I had this Friday and the following Monday booked off work, but I think
> I’ll need to cancel those – too much stuff to do here.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 08 July 2014 11:13 AM
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> Jeeva's is the best option we've got at the mo. I don't think many of us
> will stay too late so no chance of a sleepover (too damn cold there
> anyway), but I could do 1am at the latest before I bounce. I'm ok with
> being there on Sunday as well if there's enough interest from other peeps,
> although I'll probably leave earlier (say around 10-11pm) At the very
> least, we should be able to check out as many quality matches as possible
> before we call it a night.
>
>
>
> I think the main reason Jeeva had an issue the last time with the noise
> levels is because he had people over who were trying to sleep. Shouldn't
> really be an issue this time around.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Got distracted playing Lost Vikings again the other day. It’s cute.
>
>
>
> BTW, Evo is this weekend right? I’m guessing we’re not organising
> anything. Can we do Jeeva’s if we promise to be really quiet?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 08 July 2014 9:04 AM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> Nice :) Yeah, those old Dos games are rather unforgiving :P
>
>
>
> Tried some Mechwarrior 2 on Dosbox a few months ago. The game may not have
> aged well visually but it still makes you feel like you're the pilot of a
> 50-foot behemoth :P I remember seeing the game for the first time at a
> friends house back in the day and how the mech powered up. Blew my mind.
> Been in love with Mech/Mecha games ever since :) I wish someone would
> revive the genre :(
>
>
>
> I still need to try Tie-Fighter. I remember reading that it was one of the
> best flight sims of its day.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Played a bit of Rastan the other day. Was messing around on Dosbox. Good
> times.
>
> Too many of those games are bloody hard now.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 08 July 2014 7:44 AM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> @the Steam heads, if you're into old-school classics like Rastan Saga,
> Ghouls and Ghosts and Castlevania, do yourselves a favour and get Volgarr
> the Viking. Game is legit!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Well, notable Akuma players like Infiltration and Tokido haven't dropped
> him in USF4.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:18 AM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Do you think if they buffed up akuma again would it make former players
> come back to him?? Just a tiny little buff that's all
>
> On Jul 8, 2014 12:23 AM, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Leave vanilla SF4 Akuma alone. lol
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  *lol*
>
>
>
>
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/jul/07/vanilla-akuma-cares-not-zangiefs-green-hand-hits-twice-can-absorb-both-hits-his-focus-attack-ultra-street-fighter-4/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Nah son, It's called training mode.
>
> I pick a character I want to train with and then I pick a punching bag
> character randomly.
>
> After that I go through the combos/block strings, safe jump set up options
> I know and somehow discover these things during training.
>
> I'm not specifically looking for anything specific I just want to know if
> my combos work on all characters and if not I then adjust accordingly.
>
> Nothing special there.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:24 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I see you like fishing for glitches it's a very nice hobby
>
> On Jul 7, 2014 7:25 PM, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I found another glitch in USF4 :D
>
> It's Yun's red focus combo, it fails against a crouching Rose...
>
> MP xx LP shoulder xx red focus, the focus get's blocked 100% of the time
> by a crouching Rose but works if she is standing.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Yup. Capcom knows what they're doing man.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Poor E. Honda,
>
>
>
>
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/jul/06/e-honda-has-hard-time-getting-handy-himself-ultra-street-fighter-4-stlp-hands-misses-point-blank/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  It’s like the Pringles tagline…
>
> Once you clop, you can’t stop.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> *Sent:* 07 July 2014 3:02 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> At least mine is humanoid.
>
> Equine-lover-boy.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  What will Nick’s 2d waifu think now?
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
> *Sent:* 07 July 2014 2:16 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> Ashraf I think that is the wrong answer
>
> On Jul 7, 2014 1:33 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  It's actually an old interest but the difference this time around is
> that it has taken corporeal form :P
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:29 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> What is your new interest???
>
> On Jul 7, 2014 1:01 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  *LOL* Before long, we won't see you at the sessions either :P
>
>
>
> In all seriousness though, if it pans out, I'm happy for you bro :)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Good stuff man.
> Haven't been too invested in the mails, I have another interest now.
> :P
>
> On 7 Jul 2014 11:26, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Slow day on the mails.
>
>
>
> Our division moved to a new department last week. Got a chance to meet
> with the Executive Director (our new boss) to discuss the way forward
> (considering that I've resigned). Something that cracked me up was that an
> instruction had been issued by my former boss to revoke my access rights to
> the network on account of my resignation. The new boss was a bit miffed
> that I no longer have admin access to the network as it essentially means
> that I can't work *lol*
>
>
>
> I do still have a few things that need to be completed (mostly
> documentation) which I'll be prioritising this week. Need to do a proper
> handover of my current responsibilities to the gentleman who will manage
> the department in my stead. Once that's over though, I'll just be chilling
> until the end of the month :P Will still try to help out where I can and
> answer questions, etc, but that'll be the extent of my involvement once the
> handover is finalised. I've drafted procedural documentation for the
> juniors so they should be fine. Man, I cannot wait to leave this place :)
> Not too much longer now until I'm a free man! It feels like I'm being
> released from prison *lol*
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  10 hours.
>
> U 'aving a laugh m8.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Power to Nemo!
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Yo D tier *lol*
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQkG5NefXMM
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Oh and hitbox issues. lol
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  A-cho is in Kyoto.  I'm in Tokyo.  I don't have plans to go there.
>
> This interview touches on many reasons I don't like USF4
> http://www.4gamer.net/games/225/G022539/20140704102/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:40 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  thick asian ftw
>
> did you goto a-cho yet?
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 02:30:57 +0900
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Sup guys.
>
> Sitting in an awesome Internet/Comic Cafe at the moment at 2:30am.  This
> place is amazing.  It even has shower rooms for people who pull
> all-nighters.  Tokyo is awesome.  They had a live Super Mario Kart race in
> Harajuku today.  I don't think LB would ever wanna leave Yoyogi park on a
> Sunday.  Thick asians cosplaying Shrine Maidens all day.  Having said that,
> about 70% of those thick asians are male.  I don't think LB would notice
> though.  Gonna check out Akihabara tomorrow.
>
> About USF4:  Let's just say I think the game sucks even more than I did
> before.  More on that some other time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>

Other related posts: