No prob :) On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:12 PM, richard moorcroft < greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems like my knowledge has expanded thanks to you,, thanks for > clearing up the confusion SAP > On Jul 7, 2014 2:43 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Correction Rich. He has many 'waifus'. >> >> From *knowyourmeme.com <http://knowyourmeme.com>*: >> >> *"Waifu* is an Engrish <http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/engrish> term >> primarily used by Asian men to refer to one’s own wife. While the >> colloquial use of the word in East Asian cultures predates its online >> popularity, *the term has been since adopted by **Otaku* >> <http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/otaku>* circles and anime fans to refer >> to one’s favorite female manga or anime character*." >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:37 PM, richard moorcroft < >> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Nick has a wife??? >>> On Jul 7, 2014 2:26 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> What will Nick’s 2d waifu think now? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft >>>> *Sent:* 07 July 2014 2:16 PM >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ashraf I think that is the wrong answer >>>> >>>> On Jul 7, 2014 1:33 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> It's actually an old interest but the difference this time around is >>>> that it has taken corporeal form :P >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:29 PM, richard moorcroft < >>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> What is your new interest??? >>>> >>>> On Jul 7, 2014 1:01 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> *LOL* Before long, we won't see you at the sessions either :P >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> In all seriousness though, if it pans out, I'm happy for you bro :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < >>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Good stuff man. >>>> Haven't been too invested in the mails, I have another interest now. >>>> :P >>>> >>>> On 7 Jul 2014 11:26, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Slow day on the mails. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Our division moved to a new department last week. Got a chance to meet >>>> with the Executive Director (our new boss) to discuss the way forward >>>> (considering that I've resigned). Something that cracked me up was that an >>>> instruction had been issued by my former boss to revoke my access rights to >>>> the network on account of my resignation. The new boss was a bit miffed >>>> that I no longer have admin access to the network as it essentially means >>>> that I can't work *lol* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I do still have a few things that need to be completed (mostly >>>> documentation) which I'll be prioritising this week. Need to do a proper >>>> handover of my current responsibilities to the gentleman who will manage >>>> the department in my stead. Once that's over though, I'll just be chilling >>>> until the end of the month :P Will still try to help out where I can and >>>> answer questions, etc, but that'll be the extent of my involvement once the >>>> handover is finalised. I've drafted procedural documentation for the >>>> juniors so they should be fine. Man, I cannot wait to leave this place :) >>>> Not too much longer now until I'm a free man! It feels like I'm being >>>> released from prison *lol* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ashraf Barendse < >>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> 10 hours. >>>> >>>> U 'aving a laugh m8. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Power to Nemo! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yo D tier *lol* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQkG5NefXMM >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Oh and hitbox issues. lol >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> A-cho is in Kyoto. I'm in Tokyo. I don't have plans to go there. >>>> >>>> This interview touches on many reasons I don't like USF4 >>>> http://www.4gamer.net/games/225/G022539/20140704102/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:40 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> thick asian ftw >>>> >>>> did you goto a-cho yet? >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 02:30:57 +0900 >>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! >>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sup guys. >>>> >>>> Sitting in an awesome Internet/Comic Cafe at the moment at 2:30am. >>>> This place is amazing. It even has shower rooms for people who pull >>>> all-nighters. Tokyo is awesome. They had a live Super Mario Kart race in >>>> Harajuku today. I don't think LB would ever wanna leave Yoyogi park on a >>>> Sunday. Thick asians cosplaying Shrine Maidens all day. Having said that, >>>> about 70% of those thick asians are male. I don't think LB would notice >>>> though. Gonna check out Akihabara tomorrow. >>>> >>>> About USF4: Let's just say I think the game sucks even more than I did >>>> before. More on that some other time. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>> >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>> >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>> AntiVirus software. >>>> >>> >>