IMO, your unpredictability is extremely predictable because of how you do
everything except what you should be doing.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:02 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
so you saying im unpredictably predictable?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 June 2016 01:49 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Um, no. With mention to specifically your playstyle, you go for one type
of combo, and then fuzzy attack for the rest of the time until you think
you've become unpredictable, and then you go back to trying the same
combo. Which is in its own pretty predictable.
You are fuzzy predictable.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:18 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
ye i know.
nick was referring to kof. of empty jump low or empty jump throw or jump
attack.
He refers to this as fuzzy attacking
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 June 2016 01:14 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Yes LB. Players play the neutral game until they can force those type of
situations onto the opponent. But if the neutral game sucks, then it means
the game devolves into series of 50-50s.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:09 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
tachimawari?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 June 2016 01:07 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
What happens when both players try to follow your advice?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:57 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I see what you mean Sali.
however in order to stop a fuzzy attack is to:
A - not be init in the first place
B - fuzzy attack him first
C - all the above
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 June 2016 12:48 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
When two players of a similar skill level play, "fuzzy" or 50-50
defense is basically a straight-up guess. IMO anyone who thinks otherwise
is kidding themselves.
The meta basically plays out like this:
- it's a 50-50 situation
- but given his past behaviour, there's a 60% chance he'll do this
instead
- but he knows that I know that, so there's a 60% chance he'll use the
other option
- but today is monday, and monday a 6 letters, so he will probably use
the Medium attack cos it also starts with an M
- but Spectre killed M in Skyfall, so he will use the other attack
instead
- killing M was a low-blow, so he will definitely go low instead of
high.
Ad nauseum. There are too many variables, and noone is a mind-reader.
Stuff like this is acceptable in games with good neutral because it's
harder to put players in situations where they have to reason about the
what the opponent had for breakfast and how it will affect their tech throw
timing...
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fuzzy attack as well. Be prepared to capitalize on a punish.
Or am I wrong?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:23 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
how do you defend against a fuzzy attacker?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 June 2016 12:21 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Good, I feel I still don't have the timing down for this game.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I’ll give you some games over the Evo weekend.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
*Sent:* 27 June 2016 11:07 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Nothing fighting game related will ever match the awesomeness that
Sap and I experienced playing Jojo:ASB on Saturday.
I will no longer be impressed by other fighting games.
I decided to get back into MKX for a bit. I'm now playing with
Tremor and Reptile again, I want to get some matches in next time.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:46 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ye shame I don't want to see anymore pr_necalli.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 27 June 2016 06:42 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
OK, so I watched the trailer for Boxer,, CAPCOM didn't screw up this
1,, or at least I think so,, good SFV theme for him,, he looks like fun
On 27 Jun 2016 07:47, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay, I hadn’t realised quite how OP the wiz was in Diablo right now
- http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/17612071852
Looks like with really lousy gear and low paragons, you should be
able to clear 90. That’s archon with 2 piece FB. Just retarded.
Also, seems like Warcraft movie has taken more than USD400m. I guess
that means that a sequel is coming.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International
is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International
is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
by AntiVirus software.
