Re: I'm not gloating....
- From: "Deborah Sams" <dsams727@xxxxxxx>
- To: comptesol@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 20:22:17 -0500
Here's a dumb question about the Hanauer paper. Are you making an abstract
since it is APA? Is it always required?
>From: butlerdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Reply-To: comptesol@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: comptesol@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: I'm not gloating....
>Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 20:44:48 -0400
>
>Okay, I'm done with the Hurlbert paper. It is rambling, insuccinct and
>uneven
>in its component parts. But I 'm done and don't care anymore. I got 13
>pages
>with two pages of references. I think I had 22 sources! Is that too much?
>
>I am going to re-read the hanauer articles on postmethod and transformative
>pedagogy tonight. I will start writing tomorrow night. I thought the
>syllabus
>said 8-10 pages. I also thought the intro/class profile was to be part of
>that, right? So is the rationale the main part of the paper?
>
>Help me here folks.
>
>Becky, I'm sure whatever you are writing is better than the mess I am
>determined not to look at again and to turn in tomorrow.
>
>Thursday is coming! Please, God!
>
>Don
>
>Quoting Rebecca T Garvin <zfwl@xxxxxxx>:
>
> > Amy,
> >
> > You and Andrea deserve to gloat and skip and dance and run through the
> > Oak Grove. These have been two tough assignments. But like Don, I'm
> > hoping that the Hanauer one doesn't take as long as Hurlbert's. I may
> > take you up on the "advice for coffee" offer. I'll know more after
> > tomorrow.
> >
> > I don't know what's worse...chomping at the bit to go home or praying
> > for more hours to write. Go figure?
> >
> > Take it easy. See you tomorrow.
> > Becky
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
