----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Jeanne Batalova, MPI Data Hub" <data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: WMEJIA8A@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 9:52 AM Subject: The Top Destinations for Global Migrants: The United States and Qatar – MPI Data Hub – June 28, 2013 The Top Destinations for Global Migrants: The United States and Qatar Plus, Unemployment of Foreign Workers in Spain and Germany and Overseas Americans The United States receives a large number of immigrants – about 1 million annually who hail from all over the world – and because of its historic draw is often described as traditional country of immigration. In fact, today the country is the world's top destination for global migrants who come to increase economic, educational, and social opportunities for themselves and their families. According to the latest United Nations estimates, more than 42 million international migrants live in the United States. The number of international migrants in the United States is larger than the next four top destinations – Russia, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and Canada – combined. To put it in context, the US population accounts for about 5 percent of the world's total population, but it is home to 20 percent of the world's 214 million migrants (based on the United Nation's 2010 estimates). Proportion-wise, however, the story is quite different. The share that migrants represent in the total population in many other immigrant host countries exceeds that of the United States (which was about 13 percent in 2010). In another traditional country of immigration, New Zealand, more than 22 percent of the population was born abroad. In Israel, a country that has experienced several successive waves of immigration since its formation in 1948, more than 40 percent of the total population is comprised of international migrants. (Both New Zealand and Israel are among the top ten destinations with the highest share that migrants represent in their populations.) The country that claims the top spot on this list is Qatar – international migrants represent nearly 87 percent (or 1.3 million) of the 1.5 million residents in this small Gulf nation. The two top global destinations numerically and by population share – the United States and Qatar, respectively – are vastly different not only in migration scale but also in terms of the main goals of their migration policies. Here's a brief comparative overview: Qatar: Similar to other Gulf countries such as the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, Qatar admits migrants to meet labor shortages mostly in construction, manufacturing, service, and other low-skilled – and generally low-paid – jobs. The overwhelming majority of migrants in Qatar are young men from South and East Asian countries such as India, Pakistan, Nepal, and the Philippines. These migrants are admitted as temporary, contract-based workers with little prospects for permanent settlement and citizenship. Female migrant workers (e.g., from the Philippines and Indonesia) are typically employed in the domestic sector as well as in education and health care (though on a smaller scale). While the majority of migrant workers are brought to fill low-skilled positions, some are professionals and specialists in private companies and education. United States: Similar to other traditional immigration countries such as Canada and Australia, the United States has both permanent and temporary migration routes. The lion's share of all US immigrants (about two-thirds) who arrive for permanent settlement comes as spouses, children, parents, and siblings of relatives already in the United States, whether citizen or lawful permanent resident. More than half of all immigrants in the United States are from Latin America (Mexico, Central America, and South America) and more than one-quarter are from Asia (mostly from China, India, the Philippines, and Vietnam). The United States has numerous low- and high-skill temporary visa programs, and hosts close to 900,000 international students and scholars. The age and gender composition of migrant populations in the United States and Qatar are also different. Check out our new chart that shows that while the shares of working-age migrant populations are large and similar in both countries (around 80 percent), 11 percent of US migrants are elderly (65 and older) compared to only 1 percent in Qatar. On the other hand, the share of children and young adults among international migrants in Qatar is twice as high compared to the United States (18 percent versus 9 percent). There are also marked gender differences among the working-age populations of international migrants in the United States and Qatar. While women make up roughly half of the migrant population in each of the three age groups (under 20, 20 to 64, and 65 and older) in the United States, they account for only 20 percent among working-age migrants in Qatar, highlighting the desire for low-skilled male labor in Qatar as well as the cultural norms that discourage participation of women in the labor force. GRAPH OF THE MONTH A recently released report tracking migration and employment trends in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member states paints a mixed picture of employment opportunities faced by immigrants. The rates of unemployment of foreign-born workers remain stubbornly high following the 2007-09 economic crisis in Spain and Greece (more than 30 percent were unemployed in 2012), Portugal (close to 20 percent), and in Ireland, Denmark, Italy, France, and Sweden (about 14-17 percent). The data show that about one in two unemployed immigrants in the European Union is unable to find jobs within 12 months, raising the risk of their long-term unemployment. In addition, in many OECD countries, such as Belgium, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, foreign-born workers are substantially more likely to be unemployed than their native counterparts (in contrast, this gap was either small or close to zero in Australia, Canada, Israel, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States). As the figure below depicts, native and foreign-born workers in Spain experienced different economic opportunities and misfortunes during the 2001-12 period compared to those in Germany. Unemployment Rates (%) by Nativity in Spain and Germany, 2001 to 2012 Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, International Migration Outlook 2013. Available here. Before the onset of the recession in late 2007, foreign-born workers in Spain had lower rates of unemployment (10 percent in 2007) than in Germany (more than 14 percent). The crisis hit Spain hard and swiftly, leading to rapidly rising unemployment among both native and foreign-born workers, though faster for the latter group. Between 2007 and 2009, the rates of unemployment doubled (from 8 percent to 16 percent) among native workers and nearly tripled (from 10 percent to 27 percent) among the foreign-born ones. These trends were nearly the opposite in Germany. The rates of unemployment, which rose in the first half of the 2000s, began a gradual decline after 2005. In 2008, only 7 percent of native-born and 12 percent of foreign-born workers in Germany experienced unemployment. The small increase in unemployment for the foreign born in 2009 was short-lived. Since 2009, unemployment rates have gone down even further for both native and foreign-born workers in Germany. In 2012, only 5 percent of native-born and less than 9 percent of foreign-born workers were out of jobs. Learn more about labor force participation and unemployment trends of foreign- and native-born workers in other EU and OECD countries here. And read more about migration patterns, opportunities, and dilemmas in Spain and Germany in the Migration Information Source, MPI's online journal. DATA HUB QUIZ With July 4 right around the corner, there will be many Americans celebrating Independence Day not only at home, but also abroad with BBQ, cherry pies, and red, white, and blue decorations. According to a recent study, anywhere from 2.2 million to 6.8 million Americans reside abroad, dispersed among more than 100 countries. Can you guess which country has the largest number of the overseas Americans? Is it Mexico, Thailand, or France? Check your guess here. (Photo courtesy of Flick user katieharbath) HAVE YOU READ... Shaping Our Futures: The Educational and Career Success of Washington State's Immigrant Youth By Sarah Hooker, Margie McHugh, Michael Fix, and Randy Capps Young adults (ages 16 to 26) who are immigrants or the children of immigrants have a mixed record of success in Washington State, with the performance of many English language learners lagging behind state averages even as the state's immigrant youth have a relatively high level of college-degree attainment compared to other immigrants nationwide. This report provides one of the first cross-system analyses of the educational experiences of first-generation and second-generation youth in the state. Download Report | Press Release On behalf of the MPI Data Hub team, thank you for your interest in and support of the Data Hub. Data Manager and Senior Policy Analyst Migration Policy Institute data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ________________________________ The MPI Data Hub is a project of the Migration Policy Institute (MPI). Find out more about MPI at http://www.migrationpolicy.org/. Join Our List If a friend has forwarded this email to you and you would like to continue receiving these updates, click here. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe. Comments and suggestions Drop us a line with your comments and suggestions. Follow MPI