Fwd: [CollabLaw] Adultery in Collab Law
- From: ECSEsquire@xxxxxxx
- To: CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:02:47 EDT
In a message dated 8/25/2004 7:28:02 AM Pacific Standard Time,
clzatzman@xxxxxxx writes:
He wants to put
his children first, but I also want to protect his rights to have adultery
considered if collaborative law is not successful.
This sounds like getting married but reserving the right to divorce if the
marriage is not successful. First of all, the level of commitment seems low.
and
second, without knowing what case law may be on "condonation"-- ALL
settlement talks have ALWAYS been inadmissible. So how could anything that was
part of
a mediation OR a collaboration (or litigated settlement negotiations)
"condone" anything?
E. Carroll Straus
Collaborative Lawyer
CA Bar Number 110028
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Other related posts:
- » Fwd: [CollabLaw] Adultery in Collab Law - ECSEsquire
