Re: [CollabLaw] Re: the role of divorce coaches.

  • From: "Nancy Cameron" <ncameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:43:42 -0800

Pauline--no she isn't yet, but we are trying to get her on and I will
forward your emial to her.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pauline H. Tesler" <pht@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [CollabLaw] Re: the role of divorce coaches.


Nancy, is Susan on this listserve? I thought these articles were great,
and
I'd like to have her permission to distribute them to clients and also
maybe
at trainings.  Unchanged and with full credit to her, of course.  Pauline
Tesler
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nancy Cameron" <ncameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:34 PM
Subject: [CollabLaw] Re: the role of divorce coaches.


In response to many queries, I am attaching two article by Dr. Susan
Gamache
that speak to both the multi-disciplinary model and the role of divorce
coaches.
Nancy Cameron
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pauline H. Tesler" <pht@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "George B. Richardson" <GeorgeR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [CollabLaw] Collaborative Law via e-mail


I do that, too, George.  but only with collaborative counterparts that
I
really trust.  Pauline Tesler
----- Original Message -----
From: "George B. Richardson" <GeorgeR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Pauline H. Tesler" <pht@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [CollabLaw] Collaborative Law via e-mail


At 10:22 AM -0800 1/14/02, Pauline H. Tesler wrote:
I've been using emails as Sherri does, for post-fourway memoranda.
[snip]  My own preference is an agreement that post-fourway memos
and scheduling communications can be handled this way, but that
substantive discussions outside the fourway meeting room should not
be initiated in emails [snip]

I agree with Pauline. However, another way email can be used,
cautiously, is for "off-line" communications with your collaborative
counterpart. With [and only with] the agreement of the parties, I
and
other counsel may use email and phone communications to discuss a
concern with our counterpart that is not passed directly on to the
client. In such cases, it is very important to label the email as
"confidential" or equivalent.

GeorgeR.
--




<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:
<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>
     George B. Richardson          650.324.4801
Certified as a Specialist in Family Law by the
California State Bar Board of Legal Specialization





To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CollabLaw-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CollabLaw-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CollabLaw-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. collablaw
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2002