I hope you find the following as interesting as I did Leslie > From: GlenBarry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: lesliecoelho@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RAINFOREST: Making Global Rainforest Preserves Pay> Date: Sat, 23 > Jun 2007 17:01:38 -0500> > ***********************************************> > RAINFOREST CONSERVATION NEWS TODAY> Making Global Rainforest Preserves Pay> > ***********************************************> Rainforest Portal a project > of Ecological Internet, Inc.> > http://www.rainforestportal.org/ -- > Rainforest Portal> http://www.rainforestportal/news/ -- Rainforest Newsfeed > > > June 23, 2007> OVERVIEW & COMMENTARY by Dr. Glen Barry, Ecological > Internet> > The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has become the latest > > tropical rainforest rich, yet materially poor, nation to embrace > payments > for "avoided deforestation". The DRC joins Ecuador and > Papua New Guinea > (PNG) in making substantive offers to the > international community to > protect (note, not conserve or > sustainabiy manage, but preserve intact) > large areas of primary > rainforests in exchange for payments which may > include carbon > market credits, development grants and/or debt relief.> > A > workable solution to tropical rainforest destruction and > diminishment is > within reach, and protecting the world's last > large ancient primary forests > is also a relatively easy way to > dramatically and quickly cut back on > carbon emissions (~25% of > which are from land conversion including > deforestation and > diminishment). Whether this opportunity to fully protect > the > world's remaining ancient and holy primary forest temples -- > > critically essential for planetary operation and human well-> being -- is > seized upon depends upon the details of course. The > main potential > obstacles I see in poorly designed payments for > maintaining ancient forests > as carbon sinks includes primarily a > concern that there will be allowances > for "well managed" > forestry in these carbon sinks. Any industrial > development, from > certified forestry to hydroelectric dams to utility lines > would > need to be absolutely banned. Essentially this would require > > shutting down the industrial scaled ancient primary forest > logging > business; and what of the World Bank's, WWF's and > Greenpeace's desire to > see more certified logging? > > The world has paid trillions of dollars to > fight the threat of > terrorism, my other main concern is that the world's > leaders are > so ecologically challenged that they do not see what a deal it > > is to pay a few billion a year to a country to keep their > terrestrial > ecosystem component of the Earth's biosphere intact. > The rich nations can > easily afford to pay for avoided > deforestation; their wisdom, political > will and sense of urgency > is what is in question. Other concerns include > distribution of > the proceeds, ensuring that local peoples forgoing > industrial > rainforest development are compensated along with meeting the > > need for government revenues. And a strict requirement that > local people's > are consulted and allowed to continue their > traditional small scale > activities. Apparently the World Bank is > working on a test fund of limited > means to pay countries to > maintain their forests for climate benefits > primarily. It is > crucial that conservationists are wary of those like the > Bank > and large environmental groups with other agendas, in this case > > accessing raw materials for the global economy and serving as > apologists > for the timber mafia.> > Simply, humanity must establish such global > ecological reserves > to survive. And for the first time the ones with the > rainforests > agree that for the right price, they will keep their forests > > standing. Let's take them up on the offer!> g.b.> > To comment:> > http://www.rainforestportal.org/issues/2007/06/making_global_rainforest_reser.asp> > > *******************************> RELAYED TEXT STARTS HERE:> > ITEM #1> > Title: Congo to cancel logging deals to protect forests > Source: Copyright > 2007, Reuters > Date: June 22, 2007> Byline: Joe Bavier> > Congo is ready to > cancel more than half its timber contracts to > protect the world’s second > biggest tropical forest but it wants > more aid from foreign governments to > help do so, the environment > minister said.> > Democratic Republic of Congo > is carrying out a World Bank-> sponsored review of 156 logging deals, most of > them issued > during the vast country’s 1998-2003 civil war and a subsequent > > three-year transitional government.> > Congo issued a five-year moratorium > on new logging contracts in > 2002 in an effort to stem rampant deforestation > aggravated by > the conflict. That measure went largely unheeded and > companies > continued to sign new deals.> > Around three million hectares > (7.4 million acres) of illegal > concessions have already been cancelled by > Congo’s new > government, which took office this year after historic post-war > > elections in 2006.> > ‘We have between 24 and 25 million hectares still > held by > individuals and companies. I would say that I am capable of > > cancelling another 12 to 15 million hectares of contracts. > That’s the > minimum,’ Environment Minister Didace Pembe told > Reuters.> > ‘Anyone who > doesn’t conform to the criteria, those that signed > logging contracts during > the moratorium and are unable to > justify how, we are going to cancel their > contracts,’ he said.> > ‘All those who have forestry concessions but don’t > pay their > taxes, we are going to cancel them,’ he said in an interview > > late on Thursday, without citing any companies or individuals.> > Amongst the > biggest timber firms operating in Congo are a > subsidiary of Germany’s > Danzer Group, Siforco, and Portuguese-> owned Sodefor, a unit of holding > company NST. Together with a > third company, Safbois, they account for over > two-thirds of the > country’s capacity, researchers say.> > G8 initiative> > Congo hopes to receive up to $6 billion a year under an > international > conservation scheme which would provide financial > incentives to preserve > the forests in the future, the minister > said.> > At the G8 summit in > Germany this month, leaders from the world’s > eight richest countries > proposed a Forest Carbon Initiative to > give developing countries financial > incentives to combat global > warming.> > Cutting and burning tropical > forests contributes 20 percent of > the overall carbon emissions that are > accelerating climate > change.> > Logging and land clearing for agriculture > are eating away at the > ecosystems of the Congo Basin forest, which are > being degraded > at the rate of more than 800,000 hectares every year.> > The > initiative would create a fund to compensate developing > nations like Congo, > with the world’s second largest tropical > forest after the Amazon, for not > granting logging concessions.> > ‘When we see the benefits this forest brings > ... to the entire > planet, it is about time the major world powers think > about > compensation for everything this forest does,’ Pembe said.> > Fair > compensation, he believes, could inject around $6 billion > dollars a year > into Congo’s coffers -- a massive windfall for a > country with a total > proposed 2007 budget of just over $2 > billion.> > ‘That will be an enormous > way for us to pull ourselves up,’ > Pembe said. ‘You risk pushing us to > destroy our forests because > we need money. They say we are the second lung, > but that second > lung has to be taken care of.’> > > ITEM #2> Title: Ecuador > Launches Campaign to Keep Oil Underground > Source: Copyright 2007, Reuters > > Date: June 7, 2007> Byline: Alonso Soto> > Ecuador offered on Tuesday to drop > plans to develop the > country's biggest oilfield if wealthy nations pay it > to > safeguard pristine land near the proposed drill site. > > Leftist > President Rafael Correa hopes developed countries and > environmental groups > will pay the poor South American nation > about US$350 million annually to > leave the oil in the ground and > reduce carbon dioxide emissions to slow > global warming. > > "We are willing to do this sacrifice, but for not free," > Correa > said. "This is an insignificant figure compared to what is spent > > on the Iraq war." > > He said Ecuador would create a trust fund for > donations. The > government would also accept pardons of bilateral and > > multilateral lenders debt as payment. > > Correa, an ally who has followed > the nationalist wave led by > Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, says Ecuador > will give donors > until next year to make offers. Otherwise it will develop > the > oilfield, which could generate thousands of job in South > America's > fifth-largest oil producer. > > The US$350 million Ecuador is seeking is > about half of the > annual revenues it believes it would make from the > Ishpingo-> Tambococha-Tiputini (ITT) oilfield, which the government says > > holds reserves of more than 1 billion barrels. > > Part of the ITT oilfield > is inside the 2,427-acre (982-hectare) > Yasuni National Park, where Amazon > isolated indigenous groups > live alongside rare jaguars and river dolphins. > > > "We are asking the world to save life," Energy Minister Alberto > Acosta > said in a recent interview with Reuters. > > Acosta said exploiting the > fields' entire reserve would only > provide 12 days of global oil > consumption. > > He has said Ecuador would sign an international treaty to > assure > foreign nations it will keep its part of the deal. > > "This is a > sacrifice and we are asking the world to stop > consuming fuel for only 12 > days, which is what will be extracted > from the ITT," Acosta said. > > Roger > Tissot, an analyst with consultancy PFC Energy, said > Ecuador faces an > uphill battle to assure the international > community it will keep its word. > > > "It is a crazy idea, but it doesn't mean its wrong," Tissot > said. "The > challenge for the idea is the credibility of the > Ecuadorean government > given its track record on keeping > contractual agreements." > > Ecuador is > battling several international suits for breaching > contracts with foreign > companies, including US-based Occidental > Petroleum whose assets were seized > after the government > terminated its contract in 2006.> > > ITEM #3> Title: > Rainforest conservation could yield more cash than > logging in PNG > Source: > Copyright 2006, Mongabay.com > Date: November 6, 2006> > Papua New Guinea > (PNG) could earn hundreds of millions of > dollars for cutting its rainforest > destruction if a carbon > carbon-trading initiative it proposed last year > makes headway > this week at U.N. climate talks in Nairobi, Kenya. > > Each > year PNG loses about 250,000 hectares of primary forest > according to the > U.N. This forest clearance releases some 20-50 > megatons of carbon dioxide, > a potent greenhouse gas, to the > atmosphere. Under a carbon finance deal, > mitigating these > emissions could be potentially worth anywhere from $80 > million > to a billion dollars to industrialized countries. > > The way it > would work is though the adoption of an "avoided > deforestation" strategy to > addressing cliamte change. By > reducing deforestation that would otherwise > occur in developing > countries, industrialized countries could effectively > "offset" > emissions limits set under international agreements like the > > Kyoto Protocol. Money from industrialized countries would flow > into forest > conservation fund that PNG could drawn upon > depending on its success in > reducing its deforestation rate. The > strategy could help fight climate > change at a low cost while, at > the same time improving living standards for > some of the world's > poorest people, safeguarding biodiversity, and > preserving other > ecosystem services. > > The forest industry currently > contributes about 5 percent, or > $200 million, to PNG's economy and employs > only around 10,000 > people, according to the Papua New Guinea Forest > Industries > Association. A carbon finance deal could be worth considerably > > more.> > > ITEM #4> Title: World Bank Targets Forest Preservation-Climate > Link > Source: Copyright 2007, Wall Street Journal > Date: June 11, 2007> > > The global effort to stem climate change could soon include > paying > countries in the tropical belt to not cut down their rain > forests, > beginning with a World Bank pilot project.> > The World Bank is planning to > start a $250 million investment > fund to reward countries such as Indonesia, > Brazil and Congo for > "avoided deforestation."> > • Pilot Project: The World > Bank got G-8 support for a $250 > million investment fund to reward countries > for not cutting down > their rain forests.> > • Why Save Trees? Deforestation > accounts for some 20% of global > carbon emissions, mainly from fires set in > forests to clear > land.> > • What to Expect: Companies and governments > aren't likely to put > much money into the fund unless they sense that saving > trees > will qualify as a means of generating emission "credits" on the > > international carbon market.> > Until now, efforts under the Kyoto Protocol, > the international > agreement to cut greenhouse gases that contribute to > global > warming, have centered on reducing emissions from industries.> > The > Group of Eight leading nations, after meeting last week in > Germany, > concluded that stopping deforestation could provide a > "significant and > cost-effective contribution toward mitigating > greenhouse-gas emissions" and > encouraged the development of the > World Bank's project.> > Deforestation > accounts for some 20% of global carbon emissions, > mainly from fires set in > forests to clear land. It is the major > cause of greenhouse gases in some > developing nations such as > Indonesia. The World Bank says forested areas > equivalent to the > size of Portugal are being cleared each year.> > > Environmental organizations have long sought to stem logging > because of its > impact, but, until now, tackling the problem has > largely been overlooked by > governments seeking to reduce global > warming.> > The prospect of addressing > global warming by preserving trees is > alluring. Amid intensifying > global-warming regulations, it could > give developed countries -- and > companies based there -- a cheap > way to offset their obligation to curb > their own energy-related > emissions at home. On the flip side, it could > provide a source > of foreign investment for developing countries, which > don't face > emission caps. But whether the World Bank's fund will draw much > > investment is unclear. Under the Kyoto Protocol, saving existing > trees > doesn't qualify as a means of generating emission > "credits" on the > international carbon market.> > Several years ago, many companies invested in > projects to > protect existing forests, thinking they would get cheap carbon > > credits for their efforts, but then saw their investments wasted > when > global regulators decided not to allow avoided > deforestation as a source of > emission credits.> > Today, companies and governments aren't likely to put > much money > into the fund unless they sense that prohibition is likely to be > > lifted. Benoit Bosquet, a senior natural-resources management > specialist > at the World Bank who is leading efforts to develop > the pilot project, said > policy makers in developed nations have > realized they can't ignore the > effect of deforestation on > climate change. "It is the first time there's > such high-level > recognition of the need to include [compensation] for > avoided > deforestation," he said.> > Many details of the project remain to > be ironed out. The World > Bank hopes Group of Eight nations will supply most > of the $250 > million, Mr. Bosquet said.> > The bank will work with > governments, local communities and > nongovernmental organizations to set > guidelines on how to > monitor projects and make sure money will be channeled > only to > those that strictly protect forested areas. To qualify, > > governments also will have to sign up to nationwide-action plans > combating > issues such as illegal logging.> > If the World Bank's approach is to work > and be adopted more > widely as a weapon in fighting global warming, it will > take > involvement of private companies and the emerging carbon-trading > > system. Under Kyoto rules, companies that exceed caps on > emissions of > greenhouse gases can buy carbon credits directly > from other firms that are > short of their caps and use them to > reduce their levels below legal limits. > Or credits can be bought > on a number of emerging exchanges. Companies also > are allowed to > invest in projects in poorer countries that reduce > emissions, > including reforestation projects, which create carbon credits.> > > The omission of avoided deforestation from the treaty was the > result of > concerns about the environmental effectiveness of the > process -- > particularly since it would be difficult to enforce > agreements by > developing nations. Some environmentalists fear > nations might sign up to > secure one area, shifting deforestation > elsewhere, but bringing no net > gain. Mr. Bosquet said the World > Bank's project is an attempt to overcome > these concerns as > nations debate whether to overhaul Kyoto, which runs out > in > 2012.> > A number of recent studies have helped reduce concerns that > > focusing on deforestation will shift the debate away from > finding more > efficient ways to use energy. The Stern Review on > the Economics of Climate > Change, commissioned by the British > government, last year highlighted the > urgent need to bring > deforestation into efforts to fight global warming. In > March, a > report by the World Bank and Britain's Department for > > International Development found that Indonesia was the world's > > third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases after the U.S. and > China. That > conclusion -- Indonesia's economy is relatively > small -- stems from rampant > deforestation caused by forest fires > that sometimes envelop much of > Southeast Asia in haze, emitting > huge amounts of carbon dioxide.> > > Developing countries are becoming more strident in demanding > compensation > for protecting their primary forests. The Coalition > for Rainforest Nations, > a group led by Papua New Guinea and > Costa Rica, tabled a proposal demanding > payment for preserving > forests at the United Nation's annual meeting on > climate change > in Kenya in November. It remains unclear whether private > > investors will be interested in participating in the World > Bank's project, > given that Kyoto doesn't yet sanction avoided > deforestation. "I don't think > the big banks are going to invest > without clarity they are going to get > returns on the risk," Mr. > Bosquet said.> > Without wider private-sector > participation, countries could be > tempted to turn land over to palm-oil or > other high-value > agricultural use, rather than to generate carbon credits > that > can be sold, he added.> > ---> You are subscribed to > ecological_internet as lesliecoelho@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Before unsubscribing, > please consider modifying your list profile at:> > http://www.ecoearth.info/subscribe/welcome.asp?email=lesliecoelho@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To unsubscribe, send a blank email to > leave-ecological_internet-64606H@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Or click here:> > http://email.ecoearth.info/u?id=64606H&n=T&c=F&l=ecological_internet> > To > subscribe, send a blank email to > join-ecological_internet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Or visit here:> > http://www.ecoearth.info/subscribe/> _________________________________________________________________ The next generation of MSN Hotmail has arrived - Windows Live Hotmail http://www.newhotmail.co.uk