[ciphershed] Re: PMC Election: ~24 hours left to vote!

  • From: "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:45:04 -0400


>-----Original Message-----
>From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-
>bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Niklas Lemcke - ???
>Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:38
>To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ciphershed] Re: PMC Election: ~24 hours left to vote!
>
>On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:34:21 -0400
>"Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-
>> >bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen R Guglielmo
>> >Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:22
>> >To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >Subject: [ciphershed] Re: PMC Election: ~24 hours left to vote!
>> >
>> >On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Alain Forget <aforget@xxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>> >> If we adhere to the 72-hour rule, there are now a bit more than 24-hours
>> >left to vote in the PMC election:
>> >>
>> >> https://ciphershed.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=42
>> >>
>> >> If you can't access the election forum post, please ask Niklas/compul to
>add
>> >you.
>> >>
>> >> Alain
>> >
>> >You mean:
>> >https://forum.ciphershed.org/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=42
>> >
>> >Niklas got the new SSL certificate, so we switched to sub-domains.
>> >Both are working for now, but I think the subdomains will be the main
>> >location.
>>
>> Whoops! My bad; yes, please use the latter link (although hopefully both
>will work at least until the end of the election).
>>
>> Just to be explicit about the election ending time, I'm basing it on the time
>the forum thread was started, which was Mon Jun 23, 2014 1:09 pm (EDT,
>GMT-4) or 17:09 (UTC, GMT+0).
>>
>> Thus, the election ending time is 72 hours later, so Thursday, Jun 26, 2014
>1:09 pm (EDT, GMT-4) or 17:09 (UTC, GMT+0).
>>
>> Alain
>>
>>
>one more thing to notice: we had forgotten to put Giga up for voting. I
>didn't dare adding him afterwards, because people would have had to
>change their votes, and especially because I was afraid I might erase
>all votes by changing something (never used that before).
>
>

Hm, 


Other related posts: