Hi François, hello all,
Rendered at maximum possible iterations. Unravel usualy require more iterations than others attractors sets. This is precisely the case where it could be useful to dispose of your extra-bit wasted by signed integers values used by iterations counter, Nicolas ;-)
But I can wait the v2.5. It's like a telescope (hence it's name...), Gallileo was happy with his little instrument but with the actual version of Chaoscope we just have direct acces to at least the Palomar telescope! Not too bad for a v0.2 ;-)
Thanks, give it another 50 years and we'll reach Hubble stage. :-)
Even with this "restriction", the number of possible interesting discoveries is virtually infinity. More than this, I'm not very sure that double iterations would result in a finer picture. In effect, the picture didn't change so much on the last quarter of an hour of rendering. It is maybe just a mathematical restriction, strictly due to the attractor, not a chaoscope one ;-)
Nicolas Desprez
attractor { type unravel parameters <0, 0.00666666666666667, -0.12, 1.2, 3, -0.07, -0.133333333333333> }