[brailleblaster] Re: Writing extensible Java code

  • From: "qubit" <lauraeaves@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:32:40 -0500

John, I think that you can take your example of using named constants in C 
and note that not only can you abstract constant data names in java, but 
also types and methods.
So if you have a musical instrument class with methods play() and data for 
pitch range and key, you can define subclasses for class flute, class oboh, 
class cello, etc.  All of these will define method play().  But you don't 
need to know the type  of an instrument at compile time -- just build an 
orchestra as a list of instruments, and then for all the collection you play 
whatever musical parts are required for that instrument.

Hope this clarifies -- this makes it possible to define libraries that can 
be linked to the application and run without requiring much information 
about the internals of the library.

This type of thing harks back to my C++ days.  I think Java is not C on 
steroids, but is better described as a subset of C++ on steroids.  But 
that's not altogether true also as the semantic and scope rules are slightly 
different.
Java is its own language.  I'm liking it more every day.
Now if I can get eclipse to work...
--le



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 10:04 AM
Subject: [brailleblaster] Re: Writing extensible Java code


There are many discussions of this issue, and in fact entire books have been 
published on the subject.

What exactly are you looking for? Design patterns, coding practices, 
continuous  integration methodologies, software engineering
paradigms?

Take care,
Sina

-----Original Message-----
From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J. Boyer
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 2:50 AM
To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [brailleblaster] Writing extensible Java code

The discussion of using BrailleBlaster on various device has set me 
wondering which Java coding practices lead to extensibiloity. In
C, one of them is to avoid hard-coding connstants into executable 
statements.

I like to think of Java as C on steroids.

John

--
John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc.
http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Madison, Wisconsin USA
Developing software for people with disabilities




Other related posts: