Yes, let's do. We've been tqlking about this for months, and frankly I'd like for us to at least decide on what needs to be done. Then ViewPlus needs to figure out how much it can do and then get it done. Have a good weekend. I'm at the beach enjoying the sounds of the Pacific. John -----Original Message----- From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keith Creasy Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 4:13 PM To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [brailleblaster] Re: Locked Braille Hi John. Yes we need to nail something down on this. Right now my brain is just too tired to think about it but let's have some back and forth on it over the next few days. It came to the surface when Brandon and I started discussing how to implement transcribers notes. -----Original Message----- From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J. Boyer Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 5:12 PM To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [brailleblaster] Re: Locked Braille Keith, I'll have to think about how much this is already implemented. There has been some uncertainty on how it should work. When braille is locked, should the corresponding portion of the print text be locked as well? John On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:46:25PM +0000, Keith Creasy wrote: > John B. > > Where are we on this? Does LibLouisUTDML already respect locked Braille? This is an important factor to adding transcriber's notes. > > Thanks. > -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities