[brailleblaster] Re: Different Approaches to document processing.
- From: Keith Creasy <kcreasy@xxxxxxx>
- To: "brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:22:09 +0000
Thank you. This is very helpful.
Keith Creasy
Software Developer
American Printing House for the Blind
KCreasy@xxxxxxx
Phone: 502.895.2405
Skype: keith537
-----Original Message-----
From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yuemei Sun
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 11:24 AM
To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [brailleblaster] Re: Different Approaches to document processing.
Here is an example of an XML+UTDML. The original file before translation is
extracted from an OpenOffice.org odt file. Hope this helps.
Yuemei
On 1/3/2013 6:09 AM, Keith Creasy wrote:
> John.
>
> Do you have an example of an XML+UTDML file created as you outline in the
> architecture? I think that might be very helpful.
>
> Keith
>
>
> Keith Creasy
> Software Developer
> American Printing House for the Blind
> KCreasy@xxxxxxx
> Phone: 502.895.2405
> Skype: keith537
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J.
> Boyer
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:19 AM
> To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [brailleblaster] Re: Different Approaches to document processing.
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> My thought was that I would develop the documentmodel package. The
> wordprocesdsor could then use it by means of method calls. I don't want to
> take over the word processor as well, except for UTD.java, which handles
> UTDML.
>
> I agree that an xml editor doesn't need to be part of BrailleBlaster. It just
> seemed that it might be faster to get one going than the purely WYSISYG word
> processor, so an editor would be available sooner. The wordprocessor would be
> developed in parallel.
>
> Let's hear from others on the list.
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 12:45:55PM +0000, Keith Creasy wrote:
>> Yes, I've read the comments in the code and your architecture file. Very
>> helpful.
>>
>> We need to work on the interface between the views and the document. That
>> probably means defining a document interface and a view interface that is
>> XML centric.
>>
>> John, I'm not sure what anyone else can contribute since you want control of
>> the word processor and the document model. Until those are fleshed out
>> there's not really much anyone else can do. At least, speaking for myself, I
>> can't think of anything substantive I can contribute.
>>
>> I'm beginning to think that an XML editor really has no place here. Anyone
>> can just use an external XML editor if they need to do that.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Keith Creasy
>> Software Developer
>> American Printing House for the Blind KCreasy@xxxxxxx
>> Phone: 502.895.2405
>> Skype: keith537
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J.
>> Boyer
>> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:50 AM
>> To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [brailleblaster] Different Approaches to document processing.
>>
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> Yes. Please do outoline your approach. There may be some here who are not
>> acvaquaintged with it. My approach is described in detail in the files in
>> the documentation directory of the brailleblaster.newdesign repository. In
>> addition, Semantics.java contains considerable documentation in the form of
>> javadoc comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>> --
>> John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc.
>> http://www.abilitiessoft.com
>> Madison, Wisconsin USA
>> Developing software for people with disabilities
>>
>>
> --
> John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc.
> http://www.abilitiessoft.com
> Madison, Wisconsin USA
> Developing software for people with disabilities
>
>
>
--
________________________________________
Yuemei Sun | Software Engineer |
541.754.4002 ext. 229 | www.viewplus.com
________________________________________
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This message and any files transmitted with it may
be proprietary and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom
they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited; please notify
the sender and delete the message. ViewPlus Technologies, Inc. accepts no
liability for damage of any kind resulting from this email.
Other related posts:
