It depends. You can have hard SF which deals with the science in some detail but is still a good read. Robert Charles Wilson does a fair bit of this. Travis Taylor's pretty good too. Didacticism can be a major problem though. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:10 PM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: To all science fiction lovers Even though some of those science fiction authors did have a background in science I don't necessarily think it is important to being a science fiction writer. I do think, though, that their background in science shows where their interests were and I am pretty sure that those interests were both the cause of their scientific education and their choice to write science fiction. To make the science the foreground of the story, though, causes the story to be overly didactic and so not a good story. The proper place for science in science fiction is in the background, but still essential to the story. Without doubt, though, it is really important to consider what kind of science fiction one wants to write. There are so many subgenres and sub subgenres. There is time travel; there is space opera; there is alternate history; there is parallel worlds; there is utopia and anti-utopia. There are a lot of overlap with other genres, romance, mystery and other similar types of science fiction. One who has not explored the field might very well not even know of all this. I would not want to actually discourage anyone, but if one has not explored the field but wants to write it then that person is likely to be surprised about how much exploring there is to do. "If you tremble with indignation at every injustice then you are a comrade of mine." Che Guevara The Militant: http://www.themilitant.com/txtindex.shtml Pathfinder Press: http://www.pathfinderpress.com Granma International: http://granma.cu/ingles/index.html _ table with 2 columns and 6 rows Subj: [bookshare-discuss] Re: To all science fiction lovers Date: 7/13/2009 5:48:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time From: rwiley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Reply-to: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent from the Internet (Details) table end Hi Nicole. I've a couple of questions before I attempt an answer. Why on earth (or off, as the subject is science fiction) would you want to write in a genre whith which you are not familiar? Which type of science fiction do you want to write? It really does make a difference. I'm assuming you don't mean fantasy (where magic, werewolves and vampires rule). There's hard fast sci fi like Robert Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, Jerry Parnelle, and Robert Silverberg rule the roost. These guys all have some background in science or engineering. They knew their astronomy and physics. Or there's the speculative type of science fiction, denoted by people like J. G. Balard, and Cordwainer Smith. These people had a very active imagination and a dream of things as they could be in the future. I've given you a few of the older authors but there are tons of them out there, young authors climbing to the top, and old champions of the past. So, have fun reading. Bob "You know you're getting old when you stoop to tie your shoelaces and wonder what else you could do while you're down there." George Burns. block quote ----- Original Message ----- From: Elfqueen To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:24 PM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] To all science fiction lovers Hello all, This is a genre I haven't explored much, and now I feel the need to do so because I want to try writing it. It's difficult to know where to start, though, because there's so much out there. So, if you had to pick one favorite book or series, what would it be? Why would you choose it? Cheers, Nicole block quote end ************** An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585090x1201462820/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=JulyExcfooterNO62)