Hi all, Bookshare's information on page format editing is pretty clear in the validation instructions sent to new volunteers: do what you can and details some specifics. I was looking for additional information on this however. Now, anyone who has done scanning knows that typically the finished scan can have spaces between letters on the title page, blank lines between lines of text, etc, and is most likely not a mirror image of the book. That has been my experience anyway. From my days when I could see, I remember how the average book is structured and formatted, and that is not how many of my scans turn out. Even when viewing in "exact view," (with "keep exact view" set in scanning preferences and all options set to retain as much data as possible) this still tends to be the case. Okay, and let's assume that you do get a perfect duplicate scan of the book, the publishers in making things look their best (larger fonts and erratic spacing in titles and headers) are problems for screen readers and I would think, problematic in the transition from RTF to daisy. That said, does anyone know what the ideal balance between efficiency, speed of validating and quality, performance of the daisy file would be? In other words, how much can the automated RTF to daisy program Bookshare uses to process daisy files, compile and compensate formatting errors mentioned above into a great finished Book? Should we be striving in validation to keep spaces between sentences and letters to a minimal? Should paragraphs be indented? Should we rework fancy visual formats to a simpler, uniform style? Then of course, those of us who are blind can't look at the book to see how formatting appears so there is guessing and assumption involved. I've mentioned just a few specific questions here to get my point across and hopefully I've done that. Any information that will give me a better idea of what is best and suggestions for doing so is greatly appreciated! Thanks, David