[bookport] Re: power

  • From: "David Allen" <wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:24:02 +1300

Hi Neal and list:

Like you and several others, I have had no problem changing batteries. Perhaps a podcast on the subject could be helpful. I'm sure it wouldn't hurt, provided it was done in an organised constructive way.

Cheers,
Dave
----- Original Message ----- From: "Neal Ewers" <neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 6:27 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: power



Sarah and others, I have not had any problems changing batteries either.
And, for what it's worth, I like the fact that I am not stuck with some
proprietary batter pack that I either have to buy at some point, or
worse yet, send the unit back to have the battery pack replaced.  I can
understand Larry's point if they have really had problems with this, but
perhaps a little podcast on how to correctly change batteries would be
in order before scrapping the idea of replaceable batteries.

Neal



-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sarah Cranston
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 11:03 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: power


Eric,

May I respectfully ask what any of this has to do with blindness?
Changing batteries has nothing to do with vision and everything to do
with being careful and paying attention to what one is doing.  I, like
Walt, have changed batteries in many, many devices.  In particular, I
have changed the batteries in my BookPort at least 60 or 70 times, and
have had absolutely no ill effects.  I do understand that there are
those who have ended up with damaged contacts, but I have never been
able to figure out exactly how this could happen if one is careful.  If
I've misunderstood your comment about making things "blind proof",
(you're not a partial, are you?), then please clarify and set me
straight.

Sarah


-----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Eric StevenS Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 10:48 AM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: power


Well, Walt, again they have to dumb down to the lowest common denominator. Make everything stupid/blind proof.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Walt Smith" <walt@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 11:39 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: power



The last time we had a discussion on battery connections, I think it
was Larry who pointed out that in actual use, the spring type of
connectors really don't stand up much better than the present spring
clips. The problem seems to be more related to how the batteries are
inserted and removed--they
should always be inserted negative end (the bottom of the battery
opposite
to the end with the little button on it) first. I've made dozens and
dozens
(probably over a hundred) battery changes without any apparent damage
to
the
contacts and have used all types of batteries. I agree with the
comments
regarding the 15-minute charger, as well.

Larry's message slightly alarmed me in that it almost seems to imply
that future devices that emanate from his shop may not have
user-replaceable batteries and I think this would be a mistake, as it
would seriously limit the BP's portability in situations where AC
power might not be easily available (camping, for example).

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hill" <chill000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 11:29 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: power


I agree that the way the charger does it is a batter solution. I think the coil spring type of contacts also are a better bet than what

the bookport currently uses.

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 07:27:40 -0800, you wrote:

I was glad to see that the user could change and replace the batteries

in the bookport.  I'm wondering about a solution to the problem of
damaged contacts.  I
use an IC-3  battery charger that quick charges the IC-3 batteries in
about
15
minutes.  This is a great comvenience.  Now when you insertt the
batteries
into
this charger,  where the positive contact is, instead of feeling the
bare
contact, if you will,  you find a round protruding piece with a little
recess in
it where you fit the little nub at the positive end of the battery.
When
you
snug the battery against this, inside, it is spring loaded.  You fit
in
the
nub
and gently push in and seat the battery.  This protects the contact
and
you
never actually touch it.  Wonder if something like that could work for
the
BP
battery recepticle.  Just thinking.  I really like the current
battery/power
arrangement for the BP.
By the way, I don't get as much battery time per charge with the IC-3
rechargeables, as I do with non-rechargeable alkalines.  But the quick
charge
convenience and cost savings makes it worthwhile.  If I'm reading only
books
using the synthesizer, I get 50 hours or close thereto
Lois.










Other related posts: