[bookport] Re: alternate list
- From: "Bruce Toews" <KetchupBoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:11:01 -0600
Actually, I think that what's even worse is using the Book Port list to
discuss the merits of another list designed to keep discussion on the
Book Port list related to the actual Book Port.
Bruce
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:04:50 -0800, "Donald L. Roberts"
<ka7ojt@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> The worst thing about these so called alternate lists is that
> participants begin cross posting questions and comments to both
> lists.
>
> Don Roberts
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Clark" <rclark0276@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 11:11 AM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: alternate list
>
>
> Agreed. If the purpose is to allow more free thinking, why
> indeed call
> it a bookport list? And, it only duplicates what, probably
> hundreds of
> email lists already serving this niche.
>
> *---* *---* *---* *---* *---*
> The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the
> cheese.
> Robert & Dreamer Doll ke7nwn
> Newport, Oregon
> N24C 3G 8/2000 Hookup
> rclark0276@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/
>
>
>
> --
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 6419 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
>
>
>
--
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: KetchupBoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Website: http://www.ogts.net
Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net
Infoonthe Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
Other related posts:
