[bookport] Re: To the moderator
- From: "PAMELA RADER" <PRADER@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:15:31 -0400
Hi:
Although it's better not to clog a list with thank you's and one liners,
because of the list trafic it creates, I would much rather see a kind and
appreciative thank you than some of the badgering I'm seeing and the unkindness
this list has generated.
To everyone else: PLEASE STOP! As moderator, I'm getting sick of this stuff
and am seriously thinking of suggesting that this list be taken down, if we
can't do any better.
Thank you!
Pamela Rader, TECHNICAL SUPPORT
American Printing House For The Blind
1839 Frankfort Ave.
Louisville, KY 40206
PHONE: 1-800-223-1839, Ext. 307
>>> jayjohnson62@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 10/02/07 04:08PM >>>
If I have violated a rule by sending an appreciation note to the list, I
sincerely apologize. Will you please address the situation? I will say
that if it's permissible to beat a dead horse to death on some ongoing
subject, why is it not permissible to send a thank-you note to the list for
those to helped with a problem? Regards, Jesse
----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald L. Roberts" <ka7ojt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 11:40 AM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Thanks for your assistance
>O for heaven's sake! I certainly respect good manners, but why
> constantly clutter this list even more with thank you messages.
>
> Taking it one step further, why did I send this to the list when
> I could have sent it privately?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jaybee" <jayjohnson62@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 1:37 AM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: Thanks for your assistance
>
>
> Thanks; it really does. Jesse
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: albert griffith
> To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:52 AM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: Thanks for your assistance
>
>
> The latest state of the product release is yet to be determined
> but we're told we shouldn't look for it until at least early next
> year. The next area of prime concern was whether the present
> units would receive an update enabling them to play NLS. material
> and the answer is no. I hope that helps.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jaybee
> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 10:44 PM
> To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bookport] Thanks for your assistance
>
>
> I want to express my appreciation to everyone who answered my
> request for help. You were very prompt in providing the help I
> needed. By the way, I know that it has been mentioned several
> times, but I would like to know if there has been any more
> information relating to the latest release of the new bookport?
> Thanks, Jesse
>
>
Other related posts:
