[blindza] Fw: Google Glasses make Humans One Step Closer to Cyborgs
- From: "Jacob Kruger" <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "NAPSA Blind" <blind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 21:29:19 +0200
----- Original Message -----
Google Glasses make Humans One Step Closer to Cyborgs.
By Jeff Fraser, Science Writer. Posted: 08/02/2012.
A University of Toronto professor has a machine fastened to his eye that
provides him with on-demand photographic memory. A colourblind spanish
artist
wears a forehead sensor that converts light into sound and transmits it to
his
sensitive inner ear, where he "hears" colour. An Iraq veteran who lost his
sight
to a rocket-propelled grenade senses objects around him through ripples he
feels
on his tongue. And perhaps most impressive, a woman paralyzed for 14 years
imagines a robot arm handing her a drink -- and a chip in her brain tells it
to
do just that.
The boundary between human and machine is softening. The first cyborgs have
emerged -- much sooner than scientists would have predicted 30 years ago.
The secret to cybernetic success is that because of the brain's
adaptability, we
don't need to fully understand it to attach hardware to it. When Neil
Harbisson
-- the Spanish artist -- approached university student Adam Montandon about
a
visual aid that would let him hear colours, Montandon put a device together
in
two weeks with £50 and a bit of tape. And yet, Harbisson's brain adapted.
The first prototype was noninvasive, like a hearing aid, and could identify
16
different hues. At first he had headaches from all the ambient noise (and if
you
watch his TED talk and hear the sounds he listens to, you'll get a headache
too), but after a few months of training, he began to differentiate the
tones he
was hearing and associate them with objects, like "green" and "grass."
Eventually, the prototype was replaced with an implanted chip that transmits
directly to his inner ear via bone conduction. With the more sensitive
device,
he can hear 360 hues, including some that aren't in the human hearing range.
You might expect that Harbisson has to actively listen to the tones he's
hearing
to understand them, the way you would have to consult a guidebook after
seeing a
Mandarin street sign. But as Harbisson learned to use his device,
interpreting
sounds became an automatic process. He learned to think in colour, the way a
non-native speaker learns to think in Mandarin.
Neuroimaging studies have shown that when blind patients use cybernetic
visual
aids, they "recruit" the parts of their brain that are used (in able-sighted
people) to process vision. So although Harbisson receives colour as sound,
his
brain knows to process it as sight.
And it's not an isolated phenomenon. Craig Lundberg, the British Iraq vet,
uses
a cybernetic aid based on the same principle, but using touch instead of
sound.
His machine converts incoming light into signals on a "lollipop" inside his
mouth (which he says "feels like licking a nine volt battery,") and again
it's
the visual centres of his brain that process the information. He thus "sees"
the
world through the tactile nerves on his tongue.
The brain sorts sensory input, not based on where it comes from, but based
on
what kind of information it is. To understand how remarkable that is,
consider
an analogy: I think we would all be impressed with a stereo system that
could
play any format of disc or drive imaginable, so long as it contains
something
recognizable as music.
The practical upshot is that despite what early cyberneticists expected,
sensory
augmentation devices work out-of-box, no installation required. We don't
need to
plug a visual prosthetic directly into the visual part of our brains -- the
device can be plugged in anywhere, and the brain will do the rest.
There's a corollary. We used to think cybernetic devices were distinguished
from
wearable computers by invasiveness. Having a device implanted in your skull
made
you a cyborg; wearing a pair of digital glasses did not. But to the brain,
the
distinction is arbitrary. Lundberg's non-invasive device and Harbisson's
invasive one are both just sensors transmitting signals, and the brain will
treat them just like an extra set of eyes or ears or fingertips.
In the same vein, it might not be accurate to think of sensory augmentation
devices -- like Google's Project Glass -- as just a wearable version of a
mobile
phone or computer. If your brain is receiving constant input from the
glasses,
the way it does from your senses, it may recognize and adapt to the glasses
the
way it does a cybernetic device. You begin thinking in Google the way
Harbisson
thinks in colour.
Then we'll really have to answer the question: where does "me" end, and "my
machine" begin?
Source URL:
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/jeff-fraser/human-cyborgs_b_1729576.html
----------
To send a message to the list, send any message to blindza@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to blindza-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with 'unsubscribe' in the subject line
---
The 'homepage' for this list is at http://www.blindza.co.za
Other related posts:
- » [blindza] Fw: Google Glasses make Humans One Step Closer to Cyborgs - Jacob Kruger
