blind_html Re: Traped
- From: Nimer Jaber <nimerjaber1@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:04:19 -0600
Oh really Ethan? I am going to have to look into that and see what
settings need to be modified.
Thanks
Nimer J
On 8/20/09, Ethan <ethan8768@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Like I said in my last message you can click on the link and send an email
> to blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in the subject line or
> alternatively you can click on //www.freelists.org/list/blind_html and
> put your email in the edit box, choose unsubscribe in the combo box and hit
> the go button. I would just unsubscribe you myself but it seems that I would
> have to be an admin to do that.
>
> Thank you.
>
> blind_html moderator
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Betteye" <the_boldens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:36 AM
> Subject: blind_html Re: Traped
>
>
>> test
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Betteye" <the_boldens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 6:16 PM
>> Subject: blind_html Re: Traped
>>
>>
>>> Please remove me from this list
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Nimer Jaber" <nimerjaber1@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: <blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 5:27 PM
>>> Subject: blind_html Re: Traped
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> First, i am not a lady. I repeat, I am not a lady. Second, you can
>>>> unsub. I repeat, you _can unsubscribe. Did you send your
>>>> unsubscription to the right address? Did you put unsubscribe in the
>>>> subject line? If you have done so, I would be interested in knowing
>>>> this, as this would mean that there is a major bug with freelists and
>>>> should be reported to the managers of freelists. Also, if you haven't
>>>> read my recent posts, I am pondering a switch over to google groups.
>>>> Possibly, if we make the switch over to google groups, we would not
>>>> have these issues?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> nimer J
>>>>
>>>> On 8/13/09, Betteye <the_boldens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> This lady is crazy. She has the nerve to call her list blind html. To
>>>>> make
>>>>> maters worse you can't unsub from her list. I've tried to unsub but
>>>>> continue
>>>>> to get her crazy posts. I wish she would allow me to use the name of
>>>>> blind
>>>>> html? I would really post about html allow person to unsub from the
>>>>> list. I
>>>>> want off the list.
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Nimer Jaber
>>>>> To: blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 4:48 PM
>>>>> Subject: blind_html [Nimer's Political Blog] [Fwd: Understanding
>>>>> Islam's
>>>>> Threat to U.S. Vital]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's another idiot that knows nothing about religion trying to tell
>>>>>
>>>>> us
>>>>> who Islam is at war with. Beautiful!!
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: Understanding Islam's Threat to U.S. Vital
>>>>> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:33:55 -0500
>>>>> From: Travis <baconlard@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Reply-To: politics-current-events@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: baconlard@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> References: <018801ca1a80$7f1db5b0$7d592110$@com>
>>>>> <aef954850908111248x507d900dk6b17f5ad93e614e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Newsmax.com*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.newsmax.com/frank_gaffney/islam_obama_shariah/2009/08/10/246009.html
>>>>>
>>>>> *Understanding Islams Threat to U.S. Vital*
>>>>>
>>>>> Monday, August 10, 2009 1:29 PM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *By:* Frank Gaffney Jr.
>>>>>
>>>>> John Brennan, the assistant to the president for homeland security
>>>>> and
>>>>> counterterrorism, last week approvingly recalled a key point in the
>>>>> speech Barack Obama delivered in Cairo in June: "America is not and
>>>>> never will be at war with Islam." Unfortunately, that statement
>>>>> ignores
>>>>> the fact that the decision as to whether the United States is at war
>>>>> with anybody is not entirely up to our leadership or people. The real
>>>>> question is: Is Islam' at war with us?
>>>>>
>>>>> It is certainly true that hundreds of millions of Muslims the world
>>>>> over
>>>>> are not seeking to wage war against the U.S. or other non-Muslim
>>>>> states.
>>>>> America has, as Brennan noted in his remarks before the Center for
>>>>> Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) on Aug. 6, a powerful
>>>>> interest in not making all those who practice Islam into our enemies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet, it would be a grave mistake to construe the problem we face as
>>>>> Brennan proceeded to do in his speech at CSIS: "We are at war with
>>>>> al-Qaida which attacked us on 9/11 and killed 3,000 people. We are at
>>>>> war with its violent extremist allies who seek to carry on al-Qaida's
>>>>> murderous agenda." He described that agenda as seeking "to replace
>>>>> sovereign nations with a global caliphate."
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, that is the stated goal of all those who adhere to
>>>>> what
>>>>> authoritative Islam calls Shariah a number that includes many
>>>>> millions
>>>>> of people the world over. Brennan's speech made no reference to this
>>>>> wellspring of jihadism.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, not all those who embrace Shariah are prepared to use
>>>>> terror
>>>>> against us. Shariah requires though that if its adherents do not
>>>>> actually engage in violent jihad, they must support it through
>>>>> financial
>>>>> or other means. After all, according to Shariah, the purpose of jihad
>>>>>
>>>>> is
>>>>> to bring about the triumph of Islam over the entire world. Shariah
>>>>> commands that the faithful must use violence where possible to
>>>>> advance
>>>>> that objective, and non-violent means where not.
>>>>>
>>>>> By failing to recognize this justification and catalyst for the
>>>>> threat
>>>>> we face, Obama and his administration effectively foreclose the
>>>>> possibility of countering it effectively. Worse yet, in their
>>>>> understandable desire not to give gratuitous offense to Muslims, the
>>>>> U.S. government has repeatedly deferred to those who are most easily
>>>>> and
>>>>> most vocally offended.
>>>>>
>>>>> Specifically, the latter notably, the putatively non-violent, but
>>>>> virulently Islamist Muslim Brotherhood and its myriad front
>>>>> organizations have come to dictate what our officials can and cannot
>>>>> say
>>>>> about the danger posed not just by al-Qaida and its "violent
>>>>> extremist
>>>>> allies," but by all those who embrace the teachings, traditions,
>>>>> institutions, and dictates of what authoritative Islam defines as
>>>>> "mainstream": Shariah.
>>>>>
>>>>> This practice effectively disenfranchises American Muslims who reject
>>>>> this Shariah program precisely the sorts of people we should most
>>>>> want
>>>>> to empower. Last week, I discussed this problem on our talk radio
>>>>> program with someone who is trying to do something about it: Rep. Sue
>>>>> Myrick of North Carolina.
>>>>>
>>>>> *To hear Gaffneys interviews with Myrick and Sen. John Cornyn **go
>>>>> here
>>>>> now* <http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/index.xml>*.*
>>>>>
>>>>> As it happens, Myrick's district is not far from where Daniel Patrick
>>>>> Boyd and other alleged "homegrown" jihadists were reportedly plotting
>>>>> attacks abroad, and possibly here. What is more, the financial sector
>>>>>
>>>>> so
>>>>> prominent in the Charlotte community she represents is also a prime
>>>>> target of one of the most insidious forms of what author Robert
>>>>> Spencer
>>>>> calls "stealth" jihad: Shariah-compliant finance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Myrick, a co-founder of the House anti-terror caucus, recently
>>>>> convened
>>>>> a meeting to afford "moderate" Muslims an opportunity to interact
>>>>> with
>>>>> representatives of various federal law enforcement and other agencies
>>>>> responsible for securing this country. According to Myrick, some of
>>>>> the
>>>>> officials seemed to be discovering for the first time that there are
>>>>> practitioners of Islam who do not embrace the seditious tenets of
>>>>> Shariah and who were extremely concerned about the government's
>>>>> almost
>>>>> exclusive reliance on those who do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fortunately, decisions in federal court in recent weeks may produce
>>>>> some
>>>>> urgently needed policy course-corrections. Judge Laurence Zatkoff in
>>>>> the
>>>>> Eastern District of Michigan recently cleared the way for accelerated
>>>>> and wide-ranging discovery in connection with a suit brought by a
>>>>> Michigan Iraq war veteran, Kevin Murray, against the Treasury
>>>>> Department
>>>>> and Federal Reserve. Murray is challenging on constitutional
>>>>> separation
>>>>> of church-and-state grounds the practice of a U.S. government-owned
>>>>> company, the insurance conglomerate AIG, promoting Shariah-compliant
>>>>> products.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems likely that the depositions that will now be taken by
>>>>> Murray's
>>>>> legal team securities litigator and Shariah expert David Yerushalmi
>>>>> and
>>>>> attorneys at the Thomas More Law Center, led by its director Richard
>>>>> Thompson will shed important light on the federal government's
>>>>> understanding of authoritative Islam's seditious program. It may also
>>>>> reveal the extent to which U.S. officials have, with their failure to
>>>>> comprehend the true nature of the threat we face, acted, either
>>>>> wittingly or unwittingly, in ways that have enabled it to metastasize
>>>>> further.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether through the revelations of this law suit or through the work
>>>>> of
>>>>> influential legislators like Myrick, the time has come to recognize
>>>>> that
>>>>> even if we insist we are not at war with Islam, the authorities of
>>>>> Islam
>>>>> /are/ at war with us. Only by so doing can we connect with and
>>>>> empower
>>>>> our natural allies in this war Muslims who want to enjoy liberty in a
>>>>> Shariah-free America. And only by so doing, do we have a chance of
>>>>> prevailing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security Policy,
>>>>>
>>>>> a
>>>>> columnist for the Washington Times, and the host of the nationally
>>>>> syndicated Secure Freedom Radio.*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *2009*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Copyright 2009 ** All Rights Reserved*
>>>>>
>>>>> __,_._,___
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Politics & Current Events" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>> politics-current-events@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> politics-current-events+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/politics-current-events?hl=en
>>>>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Posted By Nimer Jaber to Nimer's Political Blog at 8/12/2009 02:48:00
>>>>>
>>>>> PM
>>>>>
>>>> blind_html
>>>> To unsubscribe, please send a blank email to
>>>> blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> with unsubscribe in the subject line.
>>>> To access the archives, please visit:
>>>> //www.freelists.org/archive/blind_html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> blind_html
>>> To unsubscribe, please send a blank email to
>>> blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> with unsubscribe in the subject line.
>>> To access the archives, please visit:
>>> //www.freelists.org/archive/blind_html
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>> blind_html
>> To unsubscribe, please send a blank email to
>> blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> with unsubscribe in the subject line.
>> To access the archives, please visit:
>> //www.freelists.org/archive/blind_html
>>
>> Thanks
>
> blind_html
> To unsubscribe, please send a blank email to
> blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with unsubscribe in the subject line.
> To access the archives, please visit:
> //www.freelists.org/archive/blind_html
>
> Thanks
>
blind_html
To unsubscribe, please send a blank email to
blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with unsubscribe in the subject line.
To access the archives, please visit:
//www.freelists.org/archive/blind_html
Thanks
Other related posts:
