[blind-democracy] Re: for what it is worth

  • From: "Miriam Vieni" <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:26:21 -0400

Obviously, many of us managed without special accomodations for years and
years before there was an ADA, before there was talk of inclusion or
disability rights. But I think that the point here is that  the DNC
announced that the convention would be accessible to people with
disabilities. They advertised this. It's part of their brand. But then the
reality was very different from what was promised. I think this is just
another example of what the Democratic Party has been doing for years,
advertising its progressive social values, pushing identity politics, but in
actuality, serving the needs of the wealthy, the educated, and the
physically abled.

Miriam 

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Krugman
(Redacted sender "ckrugman" for DMARC)
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 7:45 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: for what it is worth


this is not surprising. We continue to have ssues especially for people in
wheel chairs at many of the venues for the California state conventions.
Coming from the day before accommodations for conventions I have learned to
just roll with the punches and get to know lots of people from asking for
directions or whatever I need. Did you post this on the U.S. Democrat
disability list serve?
Chuck
 
From: joe harcz Comcast <mailto:joeharcz@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 6:57 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [blind-democracy] for what it is worth
 
https://www.buzzfeed.com/emmaloop/visually-impaired-delegates-say-the-dncs-a
ccommodations-are


Other related posts: