Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org)
Home > Why the U.S. and Saudi Arabia Are Suddenly Involved in a Tense
Geopolitical Drama
________________________________________
Why the U.S. and Saudi Arabia Are Suddenly Involved in a Tense Geopolitical
Drama
By Vijay Prashad [1] / AlterNet [2]
April 20, 2016
Anxiety runs through the palaces of Saudi Arabia, where the expectation of
permanent United States support has declined. Signs of this decline have
been evident for the past few years. High on the list is the West's nuclear
deal with Iran. Saudi Arabia has historically wanted to strangle Iran, so
anything less than that is seen as a defeat.
The U.S. is putting its leverage on the table: A bill in the U.S. Congress
to hold the Saudis liable for 9/11. It could mean large payments from Saudi
holdings to compensate the victims of the attack. It might also mean that
the 28 redacted pages of the Joint Congressional Inquiry on 9/11 could be
released. What lies behind the black marks is not so hard to imagine-and if
it were made public, it would introduce a shift in America's historical
memory about a very painful episode, no small thing. Saudi Arabia will come
off poorly if these are in the public domain. An emboldened Iran, a
disparaged Saudi Arabia: this is not the geopolitical scenario King Salman
would like to see. He had hoped for the opposite.
Iran
Saudi Arabia's problem with Iran is not about sectarianism within Islam.
When the Shah of Iran sat on the Peacock Throne in Tehran, the Saudi royal
family had no problem with him-despite the fact that not only was he an
adherent of the Shia understanding of Islam, so were his countrymen. One
royal family looked to another. What they feared in common was communism and
secular nationalism, which they suggested was un-Islamic. The Iranian
Revolution threatened Saudi Arabia because it produced an Islamic Republic.
Much the same kind of anti-monarchical sentiment brewed in the gullies of
Saudi Arabia. It had to be smashed. So too did Saudi Arabia want to tether
or destroy the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Iraq was sent to do the job. It failed, although the war from 1980 to 1988
weakened Iran grievously. An angry Iraq turned against its Gulf Arab
benefactors for insufficient support and invaded Kuwait in 1990, threatening
Saudi Arabia as well. It was then that the United States entered the picture
with its full spectrum warfare-bombing Iraq to smithereens and providing
Saudi Arabia with the confirmation that the US military would protect it
till the end of time.
George W. Bush's war on terror removed two of Iran's great adversaries-the
Taliban regime in Afghanistan and the Ba'ath regime in Iraq. This allowed
Iran, for the first time since 1979, to reach out to the Mediterranean Sea
and toward the Indian Ocean. Saudi Arabia and Israel, both rattled by this
development, pushed the West to send Iran back to its borders. The Syria
Accountability Act of the US Congress tried to break the Iran-Syria link,
the Israeli war on Lebanon tried to weaken Hezbollah-which has close links
to Iran, and the Western as well as United Nations nuclear sanctions regime
tried to damage Iran's geopolitical standing and economy. None of these
maneuvers succeeded. Iran remained resilient, as it does today.
The only remaining method to enfeeble Iran would have been a full-scale war
against that country of 80 million people. Israel and Saudi Arabia, like
unfed fighting dogs, pushed against their Western muzzles. It is not
President Obama who refused to attack Iran. It is that an attack against
Iran would have been catastrophic not only for the region but for the world.
Reason dictated otherwise. It is in short supply in Riyadh and Tel Aviv.
9/11
Ugliness resurfaced once more about the role of Saudi Arabia or its royal
families in the attacks of 9/11. Right after the attack, the US Congress set
up a joint inquiry led by Senators Bob Graham (Democrat-Florida) and Porter
Goss (Republican-Florida, later CIA head). The massive report from the
committee (over 800 pages) contained a small section on Saudi Arabia's role
in 9/11-28 pages long. It was suggested before the report emerged that the
section showed links between Saudi Arabia and 9/11. Two Saudi citizens, Omar
al-Bayoumi and Osama Bassnan, had, it was argued, been involved in the
financing of the plot, and had ties to the Saudi government. An unclassified
section of the report noted, "One of the FBI's best sources in San Diego
informed the FBI that he thought that al-Bayoumi must be an intelligence
officer."
Denying these links, the Saudi government asked for the report to be
released, but President Bush refused. It was redacted. After the report came
out, Senator Graham said, "I was surprised at the evidence that there were
foreign governments involved in facilitating the activities of at least some
of the terrorists in the United States." He did not mean Iraq.
In February this year, Graham, who is no longer in the Senate, said, "The 28
pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong
finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier." These are strong
words from one of the authors of the report.
If the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has any relationship with the terrorists of
9/11, the Kingdom must surely be open to a lawsuit in US courts. This is
precisely what the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act in the US
Congress intends. The bill would allow 9/11 families to sue the Saudi
Kingdom in US courts for damages. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), one of the
sponsors of the bill, recently bemoaned the failure of US courts to allow
citizens to sue foreign governments that "fund the hate-filled
organizations" that kill US nationals. "Unfortunately," he noted, the US
courts have "allowed countries like Saudi Arabia that has provided financial
support to terror-linked operations to escape any repercussions."
The reaction to Schumer's bill from Saudi Arabia was swift. Last month,
Saudi Arabia's foreign minister Adel al-Jubeir told Washington that if the
bill went through, the Kingdom would be forced to sell its $750 billion in
treasury securities. Jubeir said this would need to be done to protect Saudi
assets from being frozen during a lawsuit. Saudi petro-dollars would no
longer be recycled into the US banking system, which would have to rely for
liquidity on fewer (and less reliable) states such as China. The financial
threat is considerable. Obama hastened to say that he would veto the bill.
His conversation today in Riyadh is no doubt appeasement of Saudi anxiety.
That Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders support this bill, which Ted Cruz
co-sponsored, shows that Obama's firewall is not permanent.
Tantrum
Saudi Arabia has been floundering to re-establish its position in West Asia
and North Africa. The nuclear deal and the entente on Syria have allowed
Iran a regional role. This is now inviolable.
Attempts by Saudi Arabia to hit hard against Iran have not ended, although
it is boxing against shadows. The war on Yemen was intended as Saudi
Arabia's attack on Iranian proxies, although these have not been in
evidence. Instead of hurting Iran, the Saudi bombardment has destroyed Yemen
(with enormous civilian casualties and famine in the country) and emboldened
al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Cancelation of a $4 billion deal to the
Lebanese military as a way to punish the country for the presence of
Hezbollah has also backfired. Lebanon is aggrieved at these Saudi games,
rather than willing to stand up against Hezbollah-which many Lebanese see as
a national force, not an Iranian proxy.
Western arms sales to Saudi Arabia have allowed it to resupply its air force
for the campaign against Yemen. Unable to tackle even the Yemeni army, Saudi
Arabia has shown that would be worthless against a seasoned adversary such
as the Syrian army (despite its attrition during the past half decade war)
and the Iranian army (much more versatile and difficult to tackle). The
refusal of Pakistan to send its troops to help against Yemen is an
indication of the isolation of Saudi Arabia. This March, 350,000 troops from
20 countries took part in the Northern Thunder military exercise in Saudi
Arabia. This was a show of force against Iran and a show of confidence
against the West. But the countries that sent forces (including Pakistan,
Turkey and Egypt) would not be willing to go into a protracted and
impossible war against Iran. This was a show of force. Nothing more. It gave
the Kingdom nothing of the confidence it needs.
Vijay Prashad is professor of international studies at Trinity College in
Hartford, Connecticut. He is the author of 18 books, including Arab Spring,
Libyan Winter (AK Press, 2012), The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of
the Global South (Verso, 2013) and the forthcoming The Death of a Nation and
the Future of the Arab Revolution (University of California Press, 2016).
His columns appear at AlterNet every Wednesday.
Share on Facebook Share
Share on Twitter Tweet
Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx'. [3]
[4]
________________________________________
Source URL:
http://www.alternet.org/world/why-us-and-saudi-arabia-are-suddenly-involved-
tense-geopolitical-drama
Links:
[1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/vijay-prashad
[2] http://alternet.org
[3] mailto:corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=Typo on Why the U.S. and Saudi
Arabia Are Suddenly Involved in a Tense Geopolitical Drama
[4] http://www.alternet.org/
[5] http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org)
Home > Why the U.S. and Saudi Arabia Are Suddenly Involved in a Tense
Geopolitical Drama
Why the U.S. and Saudi Arabia Are Suddenly Involved in a Tense Geopolitical
Drama
By Vijay Prashad [1] / AlterNet [2]
April 20, 2016
Anxiety runs through the palaces of Saudi Arabia, where the expectation of
permanent United States support has declined. Signs of this decline have
been evident for the past few years. High on the list is the West's nuclear
deal with Iran. Saudi Arabia has historically wanted to strangle Iran, so
anything less than that is seen as a defeat.
The U.S. is putting its leverage on the table: A bill in the U.S. Congress
to hold the Saudis liable for 9/11. It could mean large payments from Saudi
holdings to compensate the victims of the attack. It might also mean that
the 28 redacted pages of the Joint Congressional Inquiry on 9/11 could be
released. What lies behind the black marks is not so hard to imagine-and if
it were made public, it would introduce a shift in America's historical
memory about a very painful episode, no small thing. Saudi Arabia will come
off poorly if these are in the public domain. An emboldened Iran, a
disparaged Saudi Arabia: this is not the geopolitical scenario King Salman
would like to see. He had hoped for the opposite.
Iran
Saudi Arabia's problem with Iran is not about sectarianism within Islam.
When the Shah of Iran sat on the Peacock Throne in Tehran, the Saudi royal
family had no problem with him-despite the fact that not only was he an
adherent of the Shia understanding of Islam, so were his countrymen. One
royal family looked to another. What they feared in common was communism and
secular nationalism, which they suggested was un-Islamic. The Iranian
Revolution threatened Saudi Arabia because it produced an Islamic Republic.
Much the same kind of anti-monarchical sentiment brewed in the gullies of
Saudi Arabia. It had to be smashed. So too did Saudi Arabia want to tether
or destroy the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Iraq was sent to do the job. It failed, although the war from 1980 to 1988
weakened Iran grievously. An angry Iraq turned against its Gulf Arab
benefactors for insufficient support and invaded Kuwait in 1990, threatening
Saudi Arabia as well. It was then that the United States entered the picture
with its full spectrum warfare-bombing Iraq to smithereens and providing
Saudi Arabia with the confirmation that the US military would protect it
till the end of time.
George W. Bush's war on terror removed two of Iran's great adversaries-the
Taliban regime in Afghanistan and the Ba'ath regime in Iraq. This allowed
Iran, for the first time since 1979, to reach out to the Mediterranean Sea
and toward the Indian Ocean. Saudi Arabia and Israel, both rattled by this
development, pushed the West to send Iran back to its borders. The Syria
Accountability Act of the US Congress tried to break the Iran-Syria link,
the Israeli war on Lebanon tried to weaken Hezbollah-which has close links
to Iran, and the Western as well as United Nations nuclear sanctions regime
tried to damage Iran's geopolitical standing and economy. None of these
maneuvers succeeded. Iran remained resilient, as it does today.
The only remaining method to enfeeble Iran would have been a full-scale war
against that country of 80 million people. Israel and Saudi Arabia, like
unfed fighting dogs, pushed against their Western muzzles. It is not
President Obama who refused to attack Iran. It is that an attack against
Iran would have been catastrophic not only for the region but for the world.
Reason dictated otherwise. It is in short supply in Riyadh and Tel Aviv.
9/11
Ugliness resurfaced once more about the role of Saudi Arabia or its royal
families in the attacks of 9/11. Right after the attack, the US Congress set
up a joint inquiry led by Senators Bob Graham (Democrat-Florida) and Porter
Goss (Republican-Florida, later CIA head). The massive report from the
committee (over 800 pages) contained a small section on Saudi Arabia's role
in 9/11-28 pages long. It was suggested before the report emerged that the
section showed links between Saudi Arabia and 9/11. Two Saudi citizens, Omar
al-Bayoumi and Osama Bassnan, had, it was argued, been involved in the
financing of the plot, and had ties to the Saudi government. An unclassified
section of the report noted, "One of the FBI's best sources in San Diego
informed the FBI that he thought that al-Bayoumi must be an intelligence
officer."
Denying these links, the Saudi government asked for the report to be
released, but President Bush refused. It was redacted. After the report came
out, Senator Graham said, "I was surprised at the evidence that there were
foreign governments involved in facilitating the activities of at least some
of the terrorists in the United States." He did not mean Iraq.
In February this year, Graham, who is no longer in the Senate, said, "The 28
pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong
finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier." These are strong
words from one of the authors of the report.
If the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has any relationship with the terrorists of
9/11, the Kingdom must surely be open to a lawsuit in US courts. This is
precisely what the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act in the US
Congress intends. The bill would allow 9/11 families to sue the Saudi
Kingdom in US courts for damages. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), one of the
sponsors of the bill, recently bemoaned the failure of US courts to allow
citizens to sue foreign governments that "fund the hate-filled
organizations" that kill US nationals. "Unfortunately," he noted, the US
courts have "allowed countries like Saudi Arabia that has provided financial
support to terror-linked operations to escape any repercussions."
The reaction to Schumer's bill from Saudi Arabia was swift. Last month,
Saudi Arabia's foreign minister Adel al-Jubeir told Washington that if the
bill went through, the Kingdom would be forced to sell its $750 billion in
treasury securities. Jubeir said this would need to be done to protect Saudi
assets from being frozen during a lawsuit. Saudi petro-dollars would no
longer be recycled into the US banking system, which would have to rely for
liquidity on fewer (and less reliable) states such as China. The financial
threat is considerable. Obama hastened to say that he would veto the bill.
His conversation today in Riyadh is no doubt appeasement of Saudi anxiety.
That Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders support this bill, which Ted Cruz
co-sponsored, shows that Obama's firewall is not permanent.
Tantrum
Saudi Arabia has been floundering to re-establish its position in West Asia
and North Africa. The nuclear deal and the entente on Syria have allowed
Iran a regional role. This is now inviolable.
Attempts by Saudi Arabia to hit hard against Iran have not ended, although
it is boxing against shadows. The war on Yemen was intended as Saudi
Arabia's attack on Iranian proxies, although these have not been in
evidence. Instead of hurting Iran, the Saudi bombardment has destroyed Yemen
(with enormous civilian casualties and famine in the country) and emboldened
al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Cancelation of a $4 billion deal to the
Lebanese military as a way to punish the country for the presence of
Hezbollah has also backfired. Lebanon is aggrieved at these Saudi games,
rather than willing to stand up against Hezbollah-which many Lebanese see as
a national force, not an Iranian proxy.
Western arms sales to Saudi Arabia have allowed it to resupply its air force
for the campaign against Yemen. Unable to tackle even the Yemeni army, Saudi
Arabia has shown that would be worthless against a seasoned adversary such
as the Syrian army (despite its attrition during the past half decade war)
and the Iranian army (much more versatile and difficult to tackle). The
refusal of Pakistan to send its troops to help against Yemen is an
indication of the isolation of Saudi Arabia. This March, 350,000 troops from
20 countries took part in the Northern Thunder military exercise in Saudi
Arabia. This was a show of force against Iran and a show of confidence
against the West. But the countries that sent forces (including Pakistan,
Turkey and Egypt) would not be willing to go into a protracted and
impossible war against Iran. This was a show of force. Nothing more. It gave
the Kingdom nothing of the confidence it needs.
Vijay Prashad is professor of international studies at Trinity College in
Hartford, Connecticut. He is the author of 18 books, including Arab Spring,
Libyan Winter (AK Press, 2012), The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of
the Global South (Verso, 2013) and the forthcoming The Death of a Nation and
the Future of the Arab Revolution (University of California Press, 2016).
His columns appear at AlterNet every Wednesday.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx'. [3]
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.[4]
Source URL:
http://www.alternet.org/world/why-us-and-saudi-arabia-are-suddenly-involved-
tense-geopolitical-drama
Links:
[1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/vijay-prashad
[2] http://alternet.org
[3] mailto:corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=Typo on Why the U.S. and Saudi
Arabia Are Suddenly Involved in a Tense Geopolitical Drama
[4] http://www.alternet.org/
[5] http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
