Much of my life was spent trying to please folks. I often did what I
did in order to be liked.
In later years I seem to do what I do in order to satisfy myself.
Of course one particular action is to please my wife. Making her
happy brings me the greatest satisfaction. Two satisfactions for the
price of one!
Carl Jarvis
On 8/25/20, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What I think is that the Democratic Party has had its positive moments from
FDR's administration through that of LBJ. And I appreciate the good. But
even the positives were mixed with negatives. The more I ponder, the more
clear it seems to me that although certainly, some political and economic
systems serve the people better than others, the truth is that we're dealing
with human nature and human beings can be creative and generous, as well as
being capable of doing tremendous harm. They can be altruistic or greedy.
For most of us, the most important thing is to survive, and for those who
are closest to us to survive. And there is also our sense of our own
importance. Sometimes, people do things because they want to be liked or
admired by others, certain others. I doubt that the intellectual
rationalizations that people provide for their actions are their true
motivations.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 11:37 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Why Is It Always the Wrong Time to Criticize
Democrats From the Left?
Why Is It Always the Wrong Time to Criticize Democrats From the Left?
The real question should be, When did the Democratic Party sell out the
Working Class?
Many people think that the sellout began with Bill Clinton, sucking up to
Wall Street's CEO's for support. But while that was significant, we could
more easily go back to the Party selection of Harry Truman as the vice
presidential candidate in replacement of the progressive Henry Wallace. It
was under old "Give 'em Hell" Harry that two A bombs were dropped on an
already defeated Japan. It was during Harry's reign that Senator Joe
McCarthy conducted our nation's biggest Witch Hunt, under the guise of,
There's a Commie under every rock".
True, Harry did fire General Douglas MacArthur, which did assist in
preventing WW III. But Harry did little to unify a nation whose darker
skinned citizens continued to live in danger of their lives.
Harry Truman could have stood up in an effort to protect the rights of Black
Americans, but he caved in to the forces of a Capitalistic Economy whose
profits depended upon a surplus of cheap labor. Many Black voters, those
who were able to vote, turned away from the Party and began voting for the
local Republicans.
But the real death blow came years later to a Party still coasting on LBJ's
Great Society, when Ronald Reagan began crunching up the remaining labor
unions.
Lots of room to disagree or to add, but as I see it, the seeds of
destruction were sown early and often, admits the constant reinforcement of
the Media.
While I understand why those in power find the Progressives a great dumping
ground for all of their failures, for the life of me I can't understand why
otherwise rational minded people believe and repeat the BS being dumped on
them.
Carl Jaravis
On 8/24/20, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why Is It Always the Wrong Time to Criticize Democrats From the Left?
By David Sirota, Jacobin
24 August 20
Progressives are being told by the Democratic Party to shut up until
after the election. Meanwhile, corporate Democrats are trumpeting how
far right they are — a message that could demoralize Democratic voters
and depress turnout.
No doubt, you have been told to keep quiet. Just put on your big boy
pants, they say, and find the impulse control to at least muzzle
yourself for the next seventy-one days until the election happens.
After that, fine — then and only then will you maybe be permitted to
speak your mind and politely ask the Democratic Party to match its
rhetoric with its policy agenda.
But until then, you are told to “shut the hell up and grow up,” as
former Barack Obama and Mike Bloomberg pollster Cornell Belcher put it
during an emblematic MSNBC segment berating progressives.
This kind of hectoring has become a defining part of the Democratic
Party’s culture. As the late great journalist Bill Greider lamented in
this must-watch clip: “The way the Democratic Party is run now for
quite a number of presidential cycles is they pick a nominee in a kind
of half-assed process that doesn’t really represent much of anybody,
and then they tell everybody to just shut up — don’t bring up anything
that will complicate life for your nominee . . . shut up, turn off your
brains.”
There’s a superficial logic to this call for omertà — after all,
Donald Trump is destroying everything and he must be defeated. But
here’s the
problem: the demand to shut up is only being aimed at the progressive
base of the party, while the corporate wing floods the zone with
rhetoric that could de-motivate voters.
Indeed, at the very moment many good progressives are blunting their
criticism and making clear that defeating Trump is of utmost
importance, corporate Democrats aren’t being asked to wait or hold
their tongues. In fact, they are doing the opposite: Rahm Emanuel —
who has been advising Joe Biden — just went on television to show that
the corporate wing of the party is intent on using the stretch run of
the Most Important Election of Our Lifetime™ not to doggedly focus on
actually winning the election, but to instead try to predetermine
postelection policy outcomes.
Emanuel and his ilk depict themselves as evincing a nonideological
“just win, baby” attitude. But they are most decidedly pushing a very
clear corporate ideology — and they are doing so in dangerously
divisive ways that could depress the big turnout that’s desperately needed
to defeat Trump.
“There’s No New Green Deal, There’s No Medicare For All”
The larger dynamic at play was exemplified by Emanuel’s television
appearance on a CNBC segment dubbed “Democrats’ 2020 Agenda: What’s at
stake for business?” As progressives are being told to keep quiet and
not even so much as tweet their concerns, Emanuel used the platform to
demand that during this health care and climate emergency, a
prospective Biden administration must reject the two major initiatives
that polls show are popular.
“Two things I would say if I was advising an administration,” said
Emanuel, who left the Chicago mayoralty in disgrace after his city
officials suppressed a video of the police murder of a teenager. “One
is there’s no new Green Deal, there’s no Medicare For All, probably
the single two topics that were discussed the most. That’s not even in the
platform.”
Emanuel is hardly a disinterested observer here. As Obama’s chief of
staff, Emanuel helped kill the idea of a public health insurance
option. Now, he works for a Wall Street firm that advises big health
care and fossil fuel companies on mergers, acquisitions, and
bankruptcy restructuring. Earlier this year, Emanuel was set to be
part of the featured entertainment at an oil lobbying group’s annual
meeting, during a $125-per-plate luncheon with GOP strategist Karl Rove,
before the event was canceled due to COVID-19.
Emanuel also isn’t just some random blowhard pundit spewing a
corporate line. The Chicago Tribune in May reported that “Emanuel is
having regular conversations with presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee Joe Biden and his top advisers about economic policy.”
So when Emanuel is refusing to self-censor in the name of “unity” and
making these kinds of divisive declarations that stomp on progressive
voters, he’s speaking from a position of real power. And he’s not just
tweeting these comments, which could depress voter enthusiasm. He’s
making them to a giant national television audience.
Corporate Democrats Are Not Holding Their Tongues
Now sure, you could try to write off Emanuel’s rhetoric as just the
anomalous bloviations of a notorious super-villain who pushed NAFTA
and anti-immigration policies and who famously called progressives
“F–ing retarded.” But sorry, this isn’t a one-off — this is part of a
larger pattern over the last few weeks and months.
As progressives are told to keep quiet, Democratic Party officials
engineered a convention light on policy proposals, but one that gave
prime convention speaking slots to the anti-climate-science,
anti-union former Republican governor John Kasich of Ohio and to Colin
Powell, who lied America into a war that killed hundreds of thousands
of people. In his CNBC interview, Emanuel said, “This will be the year
of the Biden Republican” — and he noted that promoting these figures
was designed to help Biden deliberately send an anti-progressive
message to voters because “John Kasich and Colin Powell don’t exactly
endorse (or) support big-P progressive policies.”
This is the kind of move that is potentially disillusioning for
Democratic voters who were previously told that a Democratic victory
isn’t just a return to the status quo — but a step forward in
strengthening the movements for climate action, workers’ rights, and a
more sane foreign policy.
Similarly, as progressives are told to shut the hell up, Democratic
aides on Capitol Hill leaked word that the party’s lawmakers may
immediately replay the 2009 debacle and block a public health
insurance option after the election — a move that is potentially
de-motivating for millions of Americans currently losing their private
health insurance.
As progressives are told to mute themselves, Team Biden last week
publicly signaled that a new Democratic president might prioritize
deficit reduction and budget austerity in the middle of an economic
crisis — a move that is potentially deflating for millions of voters
who have previously been told that President Biden’s agenda makes him the
next FDR.
As progressives are told to keep quiet, Biden’s campaign leaks to
Politico that the transition team building Biden’s prospective
administration is being advised by Wall Street pal Larry Summers and
former corporate super-lobbyist Steve Ricchetti.
And as progressives are told to muzzle themselves, corporate Democrats
went scorched earth and spent $15 million to intervene in primaries,
stymie progressive Democratic candidates, and tilt intraparty contests
to business-friendly candidates. Meanwhile, House speaker Nancy Pelosi
works to unseat Democratic senator Ed Markey, one of the Senate’s few
progressive lawmakers, and to crush a spirited primary challenge to
Rep. Richard Neal, who has used his committee chairmanship to block
even modest health care reforms.
“Hold the Line. Win. Lead.”
Clearly, this is a coordinated campaign by the right wing of the
Democratic Party to prioritize its policy goals above everything —
even motivating core Democratic voters to turn out in record numbers
during the general election.
The best response to such an onslaught isn’t to ignore it or succumb
to dishonest unity-themed demands for silence and fealty. After all,
the folks making those demands don’t actually want unity — they are
aiming for corporate victory at all costs, even if waging a war for
that intraparty win could depress enthusiasm for the Democratic ticket.
The smarter response is to follow the lead of Democratic Rep.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who last week pushed back against the corporate
Democrats’
attempt to resurrect GOP-style austerity politics. Rather than just
sitting there and staying silent, she declared that if the party wins
in November, it must make “massive investment in our country or it
will fall apart. This is not a joke. To adopt GOP deficit-hawking now,
when millions of lives are at stake, is utterly irresponsible. Hold the
line. Win. Lead.”
The brilliance of this kind of response is that it accomplishes two
objectives: it stands up for real change, and it reassures Democratic
voters that there are at least some people who are serious about going
to Washington and fighting for what the party purports to believe in.
Put another way, it fortifies the progressive agenda, and it helps
energize Democratic voters to turn out, because it casts the election
not just as a meaningless charade that won’t matter after November
because everyone will sell out anyway. It instead depicts the election
as an event with high stakes beyond Trump — a turning point that can
create new policies that will actually matter in people’s lived
experiences.
This is how you avoid the 1988 Dukakis collapse debacle and motivate
the big turnout that can defeat Trump.
You don’t tell voters that “nothing would fundamentally change.”
You don’t blast out a story about how the Democratic presidential
nominee told his Wall Street donors that he isn’t proposing new
legislation to change corporate behavior.
You don’t turn your party convention into a pageant for Republican icons.
You don’t have the disgraced-mayor-turned-Wall-Street-guy advise your
presidential candidate — or have him go on corporate America’s
favorite television station during a health care emergency and a
climate crisis to effectively laugh at progressives who are pushing
Medicare for All and a Green New Deal.
To paraphrase one of the best tweets in history, you don’t try to turn
the election into a centrist rally for the idea that better things
aren’t possible — and you sure as hell don’t ask progressives to shut up.
You instead focus intently on telling your party’s voters how the
election will materially improve their lives.
Of course, the Democratic Party machine and the Biden campaign aren’t
really interested in doing that right now. They want to run an
anti-Trump campaign, and nothing else.
In light of that, progressives shouldn’t unilaterally disarm and stay
silent when corporate Democrats are getting bolder and more brazen
about using this preelection period to push their depressing,
better-things-aren’t-possible policy agenda.
Staying quiet in the face of that pablum doesn’t help. The real way to
help boost turnout and energize voters is for progressives to push
back against the corporate propaganda and make clear that, whether the
establishment likes it or not, this election can and will offer the
opportunity to achieve something even bigger than just getting rid of
Trump.
