[blind-democracy] Whose Lives Matter?

  • From: Carl Jarvis <carjar82@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:57:03 -0700

Just having to ask the question, "Whose Lives Matter?" should set off
the alarms. Will White American Male Corporate Capitalists and their
fellow travelers ever face the fact that their world has already built
that wall, not on the Mexican border, but between White Wealthy
America and everybody else. Black Americans seem to get it, but White
Working Class Americans are still wandering about in the desert.
Because the Ruling Class is mostly White, it only stands to reason
that the laws are slanted to protect White Wealthy Americans.
Discrimination rules. Slavery, under another name, continues to
flourish. White American Working Class is played like a bad fiddle,
dancing first to the tune that they are just a dream away from
reaching riches, to a dance that they are superior to Americans of
Color, to the old tune that, "Our way of life is threatened by Those
People". For generations we bragged that we were the melting pot of
the world. It is not true today, nor was it ever true. People
streamed into this new land, forced by desperate conditions in their
homeland, only to be shuttled into the ghettos and slums of the day,
isolated from the "Real Americans" like those white snobs on Beacon
Hill in Boston.
America is a Land of Myths and Fables, tales spun to cover the real
America, the dirty, racist, angry, frightened America.
Any doctor knows that you can't treat a condition until it has been
identified. Yet, we waltz about ignoring our own festering cancer
that is eating us alive, and pretending that we are the world's most
powerful nation, and the keeper of democracy and peace.
I often wonder just what the last cry of the last human being on earth
will be. And will he/she be white, black or brown? And who or what
will come after us? And will they be able to build from our mistakes,
or will they also turn their resources upon self destruction.
After last night's "debate", the best men the Republican Party can
bring to the presidential race, I have had my Faith shaken. I know
I'll bounce, I always do, but now that I am at the backside of life,
perhaps it's time to simply observe and let the world go to Hell in
that old hand basket.

Carl Jarvis
Carl Jarvis


On 8/6/15, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://socialistaction.org/whose-lives-matter/


Whose Lives Matter?

Published August 5, 2015. | By Socialist Action.
DEM 2016 O'Malley

By BILL ONASCH

Netroots Nation bills its live body gatherings as the biggest
conference of Progressives—by which they mean liberal Democrats. At
their annual conclave, held in Phoenix in July, they featured a
presidential candidate Town Hall Meeting that included the two top
long-shot challengers to Hillary Clinton for the Donkey Party
nod—Senator Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independent who for the past
quarter-century has caucused with the Democrats, and Martin O’Malley,
who just completed two terms as governor of Maryland and prior to that
served two terms as Mayor of Baltimore. They came prepared to give their
stock spiel to a friendly audience. But that was not to be.

A vocal contingent from the movement in formation known as Black Lives
Matter insisted that the Democrat hopefuls respond to their issues. I’m
sure that as a former mayor of Brown Town Baltimore, this was not
O’Malley’s first exposure to edgy African-American dissent. But, after
first demonstrating the stereotype that white people can’t get the hang
of rhythmic clapping, he appeared flustered and blurted, “Black lives
matter, white lives matter, all lives matter.”

While few would challenge such banality about the sanctity of life in
general, O’Malley got a reminder that context rules. The BLM agitators
were there because Black lives are being taken in alarming numbers by
those charged to protect and serve them. The Guardian has been updating
a running count of those killed by police in the USA, along with their
color. As I write, the total for this year is 648. Broken down by
fatalities per million of their color’s population: 4.12 Black; 1.77
Latino; 1.58 white.

If the numbers and colors were reversed, if unarmed suburban,
middle-class white youth were being gunned down by Black cops, it would
undoubtedly be considered a national crisis. Clearly in America today
Black lives don’t matter as much. But few white liberal politicians are
willing to explicitly acknowledge this—much less take any meaningful
action to end this disgrace.

And what about the “socialist” who has been drawing big crowds—including
11,000 at a rally in Phoenix—in his quest for the Democrat nomination?
One of Bernie’s most avid supporters, Joe Dinkin, national
communications director of the Working Families Party, wrote in that
venerable organ of liberalism, the Nation, “Both candidates did damage
to themselves; Sanders was defensive, and O’Malley’s response included
the words ‘white lives matter.’ But Sanders had far more to gain by
getting this right.

“I approach this incident as a fan of Bernie Sanders. But when he had
the opportunity to rewrite his own narrative and broaden his own base,
he failed. … With the protest, Sanders was presented an opportunity on a
silver platter: He could overcome his perceived negatives and grow his
base. All he would have had to do was act with a little humility. But
instead, he talked over the protesters, got defensive about his
racial-justice bona fides, and stuck to his script.

“Essentially, he appeared to be arguing that economics and class trump
all. For an audience mourning the death of Sandra Bland, a woman who was
arrested at a traffic stop on the way to her new job before mysteriously
dying in police custody, the jobs program Sanders suggested just didn’t
seem like a sufficient answer.”

Dinkin makes some good points but you will note that his perspective
begins with Bernie’s missed opportunities. He thinks a few well-chosen
humble words might have got his candidate off the hook. CYA is what
“getting this right” means to politicians—not engaging in genuine dialog
with African-American activists about what needs to be done both in the
short-term and long-run.

Class and economic issues are key to the goal of eliminating racism root
and branch. Whites don’t need to explain this to Black workers who
understand it much better than their pale pigment class siblings. Black
leaders from Frederick Douglass, through A. Phillip Randolph, down to
Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., have taught African Americans to be
much more pro-union, and more inclined to advance their struggle through
mass action, than most white workers who have much more to learn.

The Black Lives Matter movement is focused on an immediate tactical
objective, while Class and Economic Justice is a long haul strategy.
They can build one another—synergy. Nothing good comes from
counterposing them.

Patently, despite great expectations, there has been no progress on any
aspect of racism on the watch of the currently governing ruling-class
party with an African-American president in charge and Black attorneys
general overseeing Justice.

A recent feature in The New York Times begins, “Seven years ago, in the
gauzy afterglow of a stirring election night in Chicago, commentators
dared ask whether the United States had finally begun to heal its
divisions over race and atone for the original sin of slavery by
electing its first black president. It has not. Not even close.

“A New York Times/CBS News poll conducted last week reveals that nearly
six in 10 Americans, including heavy majorities of both whites and
blacks, think race relations are generally bad, and that nearly four in
10 think the situation is getting worse. By comparison, two-thirds of
Americans surveyed shortly after President Obama took office said they
believed that race relations were generally good.

“The swings in attitude have been particularly striking among
African-Americans. During Mr. Obama’s 2008 campaign, nearly 60 percent
of blacks said race relations were generally bad, but that number was
cut in half shortly after he won. It has now soared to 68 percent, the
highest level of discontent among blacks during the Obama years and
close to the numbers recorded in the aftermath of the riots that
followed the 1992 acquittal of Los Angeles police officers charged in
the beating of Rodney King.”

The once optimistic commentators referred to in The Times included
virtually all participants in Netroots Nation. The Nation held a
symposium speculating on what President Obama might accomplish in his
First Hundred Days—an historical reference to FDR’s taking office during
the Great Depression, warmed over by Bill Fletcher Jr. in the Black
Commentator.

Joe Dinkin is right to be wary of a non-nuanced “economics and class
trump all,” but that formulation is spot on concerning the first Black
person nurtured by the ruling class to become president. The only
problem is that the economic policies of the current administration are
not in the interest of our class—and especially not the doubly oppressed
Black sector of the working class.

The 100,000 jobs eliminated at the peak of the Great Recession by the
bankruptcy/bailout restructuring of General Motors and Chrysler, imposed
by the White House, impacted African Americans hardest of all. The
attacks on public education through the Race to the Top enriched testing
and textbook companies as well as charter schools while hitting Black
communities with massive school closings and attacks on teacher
seniority and pensions.

Pro-privatization policies have also axed tens of thousands of good jobs
largely held by African Americans at the U.S. Postal Service. The
disparity in Black/white unemployment and wage rates remains firmly
entrenched—helping to make racism profitable for the employers of wage
labor.

But there was still little criticism of the president at Netroots, and
most unions and civil rights organizations swallowed their tongues long
ago. Even the “socialist” in their midst avoids denunciation of the
reactionary character of the administration winding down its second term.

Ruling-class strategists appear to favor a “bump” from a first woman
president taking the launch codes from the first Black. The real first
choice for the Netroots Nation would be Senator Elizabeth Warren—who has
firmly declined the offer. Hillary Clinton—a loyal and highly visible
part of the Establishment for as long as any Millennial can remember—is
a tougher sell. Netroots hopes Bernie can at least force her to trim
“left.” She has in fact already out bid the “socialist” by promising to
put solar panels on every American home within 10 years of taking office.

The Rev. Jesse Jackson ran an issue campaign for the Democrat nomination
in 1988. It resembled in some respects the Bernie Sanders effort, with
one important exception—Rev. Jackson played a leading role in mass
movements while the “socialist’s” resume is mostly based on winning
elections in Vermont. When the Rev. Jackson gave his concession speech
at the convention that nominated Dukakis, he reminded the delegates that
the party needs “two wings to fly.”

Though it was not his intention—perhaps not even his understanding—this
famous quote explains why American politics revolves around sentiment,
rhetoric, and personalities masking the underlying divisions of class
and color. It’s what enables a tiny ruling class to run government
without any effective opposition. Those who do not yet understand this
are not entitled to lead us. If you’re not part of the solution—you’re
part of the problem.

I’m confident that, whatever organizational forms may evolve, the
struggle for Black Lives Matter will continue. So will the Fight for
Fifteen by low-wage workers who, at least in urban areas, are
overwhelmingly Black and Latino. We are seeing the early stages of a
mass movement around climate change. These are battles that deserve the
support of all workers.

It seems inevitable that in the course of these game-changing struggles
will come recognition that our side needs a party of our own to
challenge a political monopoly that benefits from racism, sexism,
economic exploitation—and has put us in danger of wrecking our
biosphere. Then—and only then—will working people have a stake in the
elections.

Photo: A Black Lives Matter protester confronts Maryland Gov. Martin
O’Malley (right) at the Netroots Nation conference in Phoenix. Ross D.
Franklin / AP





Share this:

Facebook3
Twitter2
Google
Tumblr




Posted in Black Liberation, Elections. | Tagged Bernie Sanders, Black
Lives Matter, Democratic Party, Democrats, Martin O’Malley, Netroots,
Phoenix.







Get Involved


Join Socialist Action
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Events






Subscribe to Our Newspaper


JAN. 2014 p.1 jpegJAN. 2014 p. 12












Subscribe Today



Subscriptions to the monthly print edition of Socialist Action are
available for the following rates:

- 12 month subscription for $20
- 24 month subscription for $37
- 6 month subscription for $10







Learn More






Email Updates



Enter your email address to subscribe to our free e-mail Socialist
Action Newsletter. Also to receive notifcations of new web posts by email.







Learn More






Newspaper Archives

Select Month August 2015 (1) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015
(10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015
(10) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September
2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014
(11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014
(11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September
2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013
(14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January 2013
(17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September
2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012
(19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012
(17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September
2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011
(19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (16) January 2011
(15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September
2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9)
April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9)
December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009
(3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April
2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10)
December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September
2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008
(2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008
(11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1)
April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11)
November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006
(11) July 2006 (12) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March
2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9)
November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005
(9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March
2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14)
November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002
(21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15)
January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001
(18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000
(21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21)
April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20)
December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September
1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999
(27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999
(24) July 1998 (12) 0 (2)







Learn More






Pamphlets/Books



Socialist Action publishes a wide variety of pamphlets on burning issues
of today such as global warming, women’s liberation, the Middle East and
other subjects.







Learn More





Socialist Action (U.S.): socialistaction@xxxxxxx | (510) 268-9429

Socialist Action / Ligue pour l’Action socialiste (Canada):
barryaw@xxxxxxxxxx

Copyright © 2015 Socialist Action. All Rights Reserved. Site Design by
Lucid Digital Designs | Site Utilities







Other related posts: