https://socialistaction.org/2017/05/11/which-way-for-the-climate-movement/
Which way for the climate movement?
/ 22 hours ago
May 2017 Climate Lou AnnBy MICHAEL SCHREIBER
On April 29, more than 200,000 people marched in Washington, D.C., in a
powerful show of determination to rescue the earth from the ravages of
climate change. Over 370 sister marches took place simultaneously across
the United States and in countries around the world from Britain to
Brazil, and from Mexico to Kenya and the Philippines.
The size of the crowd in Washington far surpassed earlier expectations
by the organizers and the National Park Service. At precisely 2 p.m.,
virtually the entire march, which at that point extended more than 20
blocks along Pennsylvania Avenue from the Capitol to the White House,
grew quiet as people sat down as an ensemble. Drums kept the rhythm as
the marchers thumped their chests to show that while coming from many
backgrounds, their hearts beat as one.
In addition to the colorful puppets and banners carried by organized
contingents, most of the marchers brought hand-lettered signs, with
slogans reflecting a variety of related social concerns (such as “Black
Lives Matter”) in addition to that of the environment.
Although the organized trade-union contingents were meager, spirited
groups of Native Americans, LGBTQ people, and communities of
color—including a number of Washington, D.C., youth—made their presence
felt.
“In the face of a federal administration that would rather reap profits
than protect people, our communities are rising up,” Jeremiah Lowery,
climate justice organizer with the Chesapeake Climate Action Network,
said in a press statement on the eve of the march. “In Washington, D.C.
and around the world, it’s low-income communities, communities of color,
and workers who are bearing the brunt of the climate crisis they did the
least to contribute to.”
There is no doubt that the threats by the Trump administration to pull
out of the Paris Climate Accords and to rescind environmental measures
put in place by Obama—which themselves were far from adequate—were
responsible for swelling the numbers of people who joined the demonstration.
Only three days before the April 29 actions, Trump and Secretary of
Interior Ryan Zinke released plans to open federal land across the
country, including historic and sacred Native American sites, to fossil
fuel mining. At the same time, the administration revealed its plans to
roll back environmental protections in ocean waters in order to increase
oil exploration and drilling. Twenty-seven areas on land and sea would
lose their designations as National Monuments.
“Six months ago, my kids woke up to half a foot of water in our living
room,” said Cherri Foytlin, director of BOLD Louisiana and spokesperson
for the Indigenous Environmental Network. “Now, Trump wants to open up
the Gulf Coast to even more offshore drilling. But we have a message for
him: we are not afraid, and we will not stop fighting. With 100 and
500-year storms now coming every year, we are fighting for our lives.”
Scorn for Trump and his policies favoring Big Oil was likewise
widespread in the Science Marches, which brought out tens of thousands
on the previous weekend, Earth Day.
The Washington march on April 29 was sponsored by the People’s Climate
Mobilization, a coalition that had the active support of over 900
environmental, labor, and social justice organizations. The PCM was
founded three years earlier around the giant September 2014 Climate
March in New York City.
A lingering criticism of the 2014 action was that, despite its massive
size, it yielded relatively few organizing projects in its wake. In
contrast, the PCM is now trying to carry the momentum forward, and
particular attention has been given in PCM literature to the situation
of front-line, indigenous, and working-class communities in the climate
fight.
“Today’s actions are not for one day or one week or one year,” PCM
national coordinator Paul Gestos states. “We are a movement that is
getting stronger everyday for our families, our communities and our
planet. To change everything, we need everyone.”
But in order to achieve real “change,” our goals and strategy need to be
hammered out and made precise. Unfortunately, the movement to combat
climate change has lagged in promoting a broad and democratic
discussion, while key figures in the current leadership have allowed
themselves to be lured into supporting proposals that fall short of the
major tasks ahead.
Just days before the April 29 climate mobilization, Democratic Party
Senators Bernie Sanders, Jeff Merkley, and Cory Booker announced that
they were sponsoring a new bill that, among other provisions, would
mandate a U.S. transition to 100 percent renewable energy no later than
2050. The bill, dubbed the “100 by ’50 Act,” was immediately embraced by
several environmental leaders. Jason Kowalski of 350.org cheered it on
as the “North Star” of the climate movement. Bill McKibben, founder of
350.org, touted the bill in an April 19 Nation article as being able to
bring about “an end to fossil-fuel infrastructure.”
McKibben claimed correctly that the U.S. needs to undertake a “World War
II-scale mobilization for clean energy,” but he was far off the mark in
implying that passage of the Senate bill would launch an effort at
anywhere near that level. During the war, the government essentially
took control of the entire economy. The total output of U.S.
manufactured goods increased 300 percent from 1940 to 1944, mainly due
to government orders and investment.
In 1945, the U.S. devoted over 41 percent of the economy to war
spending, whereas the Sanders-Merkley bill would allocate less than 1
percent of the $18.5 trillion U.S. economy to protecting the climate.
Should climate activists rally around the “100 by ’50 Act?” In a Common
Dreams article, Ezra Silk, director of strategy and policy for The
Climate Mobilization, gave strong arguments against that course. He
believes that by establishing 2050 as the target year for 100 percent
renewable energy, the bill falls far short of what is necessary and thus
“fails to meet the challenge of this historic moment.”
Silk pointed out that even the makers of the bill admit that it stands
little chance of passage in the Senate, and so, “why not go big [in
establishing goals] and try to actually solve the climate crisis?” He
stressed that “for humanity to have a good chance of holding warming
permanently below 1.5°C (which itself is far too high for safety), there
is no carbon budget left to burn. …
“That means we need to stop emitting greenhouse [gases] right now. And
according to climate scientist Michael Mann, even if we did that, the
current carbon dioxide concentrations of approximately ~405 ppm are
already high enough to produce a catastrophic 2°C of warming, which
would devastate African farmers’ ability to grow food and would cause a
large-scale release of greenhouse gases from thawing permafrost.”
Ending the climate crisis, Silk wrote, would require at the very least:
1) Building a zero greenhouse gas emissions economy in 10 years or less.
2) Tackling all sources of greenhouse gas emissions—including the food
system.
3) Safely removing all the excess carbon from the atmosphere to get back
to pre-industrial greenhouse gas concentrations.
Silk expressed a favorable opinion of the Democratic Party, and of
Bernie Sanders in particular as a “trusted messenger” of the climate
movement. We think his enthusiastic trust in Sanders is misplaced, but
we strongly agree with his criticisms of the Merkley-Sanders-Booker bill.
Giving active support to the bill would drive the climate movement into
an unnecessary detour, a diversion. The snail-paced provisions of the
bill, even if they were enacted, would prolong the lives of the
automobile and fossil fuel industries at the world’s expense. And more
fundamentally, it is unrealistic to expect the U.S. Congress, which is
entirely beholden to the corporate and banking interests that profit
from fossil fuels, to undertake the systematic planning necessary to
combat climate change.
The first task of the U.S. climate movement is to mobilize millions of
citizens in mass action to confront the governmental and corporate
purveyors of climate change with hard demands of what needs to be done.
An essential tool in this process would be democratic regional
conferences, in which the environmental movement can interact with
organizations of workers, community groups, and oppressed people to plan
our strategy and goals and to build a united coalition of struggle.
It is essential that the trade unions give muscle to this movement,
mobilizing their members and the entire working class in the effort.
Ultimately, it will be the working class and its allies—those who suffer
the most from climate change and environmental degradation—who will take
charge of restructuring the economy for human needs instead of profits,
and of building a fully democratic and sustainable society.
Photo courtesy of Lou Ann Merkle: Philadelphia activists joined the
crowd of 200,000 on April 29 in Washington.
Share this:
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
6Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)6
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
May 11, 2017 in Environment.
Related posts
The largest protest in U.S. history: Women’s marches draw 4 million
Huge April 29 mobilization demands: ‘End the Iraq War now!’
Fracking destroys our health, climate
Post navigation
← Chicago workers take to the streets on May Day
Nuclear insanity: U.S. threatens North Korea →
Get Involved!
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action
Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month May 2017 (7) April 2017 (14) March
2017 (13) February 2017 (19) January 2017 (13) December 2016 (12)
November 2016 (19) October 2016 (12) September 2016 (10) August 2016
(10) July 2016 (14) June 2016 (14) May 2016 (9) April 2016 (12) March
2016 (14) February 2016 (8) January 2016 (11) December 2015 (11)
November 2015 (9) October 2015 (8) September 2015 (10) August 2015
(7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March
2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12)
November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September 2014 (6) August 2014
(10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10)
March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014 (11) December 2013
(10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September 2013 (13) August
2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013 (14) April 2013
(14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January 2013 (17) December
2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April
2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012 (17)
December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September
2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011
(19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (16) January 2011
(15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September
2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9)
April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9)
December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009
(3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April
2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10)
December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September
2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008
(2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008
(11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1)
April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11)
November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006
(11) July 2006 (18) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March
2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9)
November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005
(9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March
2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14)
November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002
(21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15)
January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September
2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September
2000 (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000
(21) April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000
(20) December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September
1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999
(27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999
(24) July 1998 (12)
Search
View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActUS’s profile on Twitter
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
Upcoming Events
No upcoming events
Category Cloud
Actions & Protest Africa Anti-War Arts & Culture Black Liberation Canada
Caribbean Civil Liberties Cuba East Asia Economy Education & Schools
Elections Environment Europe Immigration Indigenous Rights International
Labor Latin America Latino Civil Liberties Marxist Theory & History
Middle East Palestine Police & FBI Prisons South Asia Uncategorized Vote
Socialist Action Women's Liberation
View Calendar
Blog at WordPress.com.
