https://socialistworker.org/2016/09/16/what-will-a-socialist-society-be-like
Comment: Jessica Hansen-Weaver
.
What will a socialist society be like?
At the most basic level, socialism will be the polar opposite of
capitalism. But can we get more specific? Jessica Hansen-Weaver explains
how Marxists approach the question.
September 16, 2016
The soviets of the Russian Revolution provided a model of the basic
building block of workers' democracy
The soviets of the Russian Revolution provided a model of the basic
building block of workers' democracy
THE 2016 presidential election has created an environment where millions
of people who are sympathetic to socialism will be pressured to choose
between the revolting and ridiculous Republican bigot Donald Trump and
the supposed "lesser evil" Hillary Clinton.
In order to build a left that can resist the pressure to give in to
"lesser evilism" this year, we have to provide an alternative that
offers real hope for the future--with a vision of what socialism, an
entirely different kind of society, could look like.
The starting point of this vision of socialism is that it is a society
that has to be created by revolutionary means--not only, as Karl Marx
wrote a century and a half ago, because the ruling class will not
voluntarily give up power in any other way, but because it is only
through our own struggles for social change and ultimately revolution
that ordinary people can learn how to rule democratically and develop
socialist consciousness.
As Hal Draper wrote in his classic essay The Two Souls of Socialism:
How does a people or a class become fit to rule in their own name? Only
by fighting to do so. Only by waging their struggle against
oppression--oppression by those who tell them they are unfit to govern.
Only by fighting for democratic power do they educate themselves and
raise themselves up to the level of being able to wield that power.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HOW DOES this happen? We can get a small taste of the process from the
struggles of today. For example, after this spring's victorious strike
by Verizon workers, one striker interviewed by SocialistWorker.org said,
"For a section of the membership, [the strike] was a transformative
experience where we really felt our power. And it was obvious that this
came from our personal participation and the widespread popular support
for the strike."
Participating in protest movements challenges the "common sense" we've
been taught by capitalism and breaks working people out of the
deliberately fostered isolation that keeps us from seeing our shared
interests with one another.
We are all shaped by the racist, sexist, homophobic and nativist ideas
perpetuated by the ideological institutions of capitalism. In order to
get rid of these rotten ideas--what Marx called "the muck of ages"--we
have to collectively challenge the system that perpetuates and depends
on them to defuse dissent.
Another example from the president: During its 2012 strike, the Chicago
Teachers Union (CTU) consciously set out to build unity between a
multiracial teaching force and the Black and Latino communities that
make up the vast majority of public school students. The CTU connected
its struggle for a fair contract with wider questions about poverty,
racism and police violence.
In this way, the teachers' fight became a cause for all working-class
Chicago to embrace. The strike succeeded both because of the unity of
rank-and-file teachers within the union, but the solidarity of working
people who supported their teachers and students.
Organized workers not only have the potential to win strikes, but to
bring together the majority of oppressed people in society to take on
those in power. This is the potential that led Marx to call workers the
"universal class."
The central role in changing society that socialists assign to the
working class depends not on its numbers, but on its position within the
capitalist economy. Workers have the ability to shut down production and
draw behind them other sectors of society--even in countries where the
working class is a minority, though this is less and less the case as
the free market has spread and developed around the globe.
This is the starting point for understanding what socialism will look
like. At its heart, socialism is a society based on workers' power,
where the state functions in the interests of the working class because
the working class has control of workplaces and the state itself.
A government that acts--or claims to act--on behalf of workers isn't the
same as a workers' state. The question to ask is who is actually in
charge. It is not enough for representatives to act in the interests of
workers--there must be mechanisms for workers to assert their power from
the bottom up. This begins in the workplace, but extends to all aspects
of social life.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SOCIALISTS ARE often accused of being dreamers. But in order to devote
our energy to the overthrow of capitalism, we must be able to imagine a
different world from the one we live in--and believe that different
world is possible.
There are limits on the imaginations of socialists, however--based on
our understanding of how the historical development of a given society
allows certain possibilities, but rules out others.
In past class societies, the lower level of technological and scientific
development made it impossible to produce enough food to abolish food
scarcity for at least some--which made a society based on equality and
abundance impossible, too.
As Marx and his colleague Frederick Engels pointed out in the Communist
Manifesto, capitalism was a revolutionary advance over the old order
because it developed the productive capacity of society beyond the old
limits of scarcity. But achieving a world in which there is enough to go
around depends on harnessing all the resources of society under genuine
democratic control to everyone's needs--ultimately, on an international
basis.
The Russian revolutionary Lenin explained why this historical
materialist approach is the way to take our dreams more seriously, not less:
The rift between dreams and reality causes no harm if only the person
dreaming believes seriously in their dream, if they attentively observe
life, compare their observations with their castles in the air and if,
generally speaking, they work conscientiously for the achievement of
their fantasies.
Lenin grappled directly with these questions as a leader of the Russian
Revolution of 1917, during which millions of people self-organized into
soviets--the Russian phrase for "workers' councils"--overthrew the
monarchy and began the attempt to create a socialist society.
While the revolution was eventually defeated and a dictatorship led by
Joseph Stalin established in its place--though falsely still claiming
the name of socialism--this was mainly because the movement for
socialism was ultimately defeated in wealthier European countries.
Revolutionary Russia was left poor and isolated, decimating the working
class at the heart of the revolution.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ANY IMAGINING of a socialist future must involve the expansion of social
rights and class-based democracy. Liberation can't be a reality until
people's basic needs are met: from food and housing to education and
interpersonal connection.
Many of the kinds of transformations we want in education can be won as
reforms under capitalism, as part of the struggle for social rights more
broadly. Examples of these changes would be abolishing private
education, putting greater resources into public schools, and
eliminating standardized testing as a means of measuring the quality of
education.
But other aspects of a truly liberatory education can't be achieved
under capitalism--due to the role that the education system, as part of
a broader system that Marxists call social reproduction, plays in
maintaining capitalist social relations.
Social class is marked indelibly on every aspect of education. The rich
send their children to schools that encourage creative and critical
thinking--the traits that these things produce are necessary for running
society.
But the rich don't need the children of the working majority to run
society. Thus, schools attended by working class students are shaped by
segregation, discipline, competition and conformity--despite the best
efforts, in many cases, of teachers who want the best for their students.
Under socialism, we can imagine education being a means for working
people to have greater control over their lives. A people's history will
need to be written to explain the story of the horrors perpetrated by
capitalism, how they came about, and how we were able to struggle for a
better world.
Liberatory education needs to create an education based on questioning
and an approach that opens rather than closes the process of thinking,
comparing, reasoning, perspective-taking and dialogue.
Under capitalism, most of us don't have the time or energy to develop
ourselves outside our social roles as workers, parents, students,
caregivers and the like. These roles end up defining who we are and
taking up most of our waking lives.
By removing the imperative to generate profit, in a socialist society,
people will no longer need to work so many hours, and work can be
organized to maximize non-work time. With more leisure time, people can
begin to redefine their social roles and explore creativity in new ways.
Access to art-making and culture-making should be a social right. Under
socialism, this would open the door to new ways of seeing, new forms of
artistic expression and new meaning for art and aesthetics.
We know this from the glimpses we have of the future in the
revolutionary struggles of the past--in revolutionary Russia, for
example, theater, music and art thrived in spite of the country's
poverty--because of the energy of mass democracy and participation.
If material conditions fundamentally shape who we are, then we can
imagine that a society which puts resources into public health, child
development, education and recreation would produce healthier and
happier people. The concepts of health and happiness would be enhanced
beyond their current meaning of freedom from disease and violence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DURING THE immediate period after a revolutionary struggle wins control
over the commanding institutions of society, including the state,
elements of capitalism will remain.
One such element is the former ruling class and counterrevolutionary
forces that look to it. These cannot be allowed to wield their old
power--they must be prevented from doing so to defend the revolution.
Centuries of oppression, exploitation and ideological warfare have
allowed the capitalist class to amass enormous amounts of wealth and
power, and to develop institutions for protecting that power. Some form
of state power will be required to dismantle these institutions.
There will be much more to dismantle after a successful revolution than
merely the power of the ruling minority of the old order. Reparations
will due to African Americans, Indigenous people, women, the poor, the
incarcerated and others. There will be a need for sustained policies and
programs needed to address the gross inequalities and collective traumas
inherited from the previous society.
After the Russian Revolution ended the rule of the pro-capitalist
Provisional Government, the soviets immediately passed a series of
decrees that, for example, gave women equal rights to divorce and other
measures.
But the Russian revolutionaries didn't stop with decrees and laws. They
initiated campaigns and programs to challenge the social practices and
ingrained attitudes carried over from a society in which women were
oppressed. The aim was to make the legal decree of equality into a
social reality.
Probably the greatest challenge facing a socialist society in the future
will be the global effort to combat and reverse climate change and
environmental devastation, and to restore a healthy metabolic
relationship between our biosphere and humanity.
Centuries of careless fossil fuel production, deforestation, pollution
of oceans and rising temperatures means resource abundance is not
guaranteed. Sustainability and availability of resources will determine
how the new society is able to produce what it needs and where, and so
forth. There will no doubt be heated debates about the best way to go
about these tasks, taking into consideration the needs of people across
a variety of regions.
After the revolution, revolutionaries must continue to struggle for
workers' democracy, and certainly not depend on the state to
"democratize society" for us. There is no blueprint for how socialism
will play out despite our best efforts--because history is made by human
beings, under circumstances not of their own choosing.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THE PRIMARY reason that people today are questioning capitalism and
considering socialism as an alternative is because the system isn't
working for them.
Capitalism has been able to survive as a system of blatant exploitation
and inequality by successfully dividing and oppressing the working
class. The material basis for these divisions is produced by false
scarcity in the labor market that pits workers in competition against
one another over access to jobs and benefits. This allows capitalists to
lower overall wages and undermine workers' collective organizing.
As social beings, we are evolved to depend upon human connectedness.
Under capitalism people are simultaneously living in greater proximity
to each other and feeling profoundly isolated.
This is why a socialist world today is not only possible but necessary.
Young people are open to socialist ideas because their economic
prospects have been systematically degraded by the student-debt
nightmare, the high cost of housing and stagnation in wages. Millenials
also have dramatically different ideas about gender and sexuality.
This ideological shift isn't some natural human evolution nor evidence
that socialist revolution is on the immediate horizon. Rather, it
reflects the decades and centuries of struggle that have won important
reforms, resulting in changed generational ideas.
But these changes can drive people to look for the answer to bigger
questions still: How do we end climate change? How do we end wars? How
can we make sure all children are fed?
The answers to these questions must lead people to consider socialism as
an alternative to our current state of affairs--and to seek to put the
ideas of many generations of working-class fighters to the test of
creating a new society.
Print
E-mail
Share
close
Facebook
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Digg
del.icio.us
Diigo
Furl
Google
identi.ca
LinkedIn
MySpace
Newskicks
Newsvine
Ping This!
Reddit
Technorati
Tumblr
Yahoo
Respond
.
Main menu
Home
Recent
E-mail alerts
RSS
Donate
International Socialist Org.
About Us
Contact us
..
Related articles
◾What would a revolution look like?
◾Are movements enough to make socialism?
◾Independiente del estatus quo
◾Solidarity and a new struggle for socialism
◾Breathing in the socialism in the air
Recent articles
9/16
9/15
9/14
9/13
9/12
9/8
Friday, September 16th
◾What will a socialist society be like?
Blogs
Critical reading
◾Extreme racial inequality in Wisconsin
◾How Hillary Clinton Promotes Islamophobia
◾Owen Jones on the #Brexit vote in the UK
◾What is neoliberalism?
◾The Torturing of Mentally Ill Prisoners
E-mail alerts
Sign up for e-mail alerts from SocialistWorker.org.
E-mail address:
Find out about the activities of the International Socialist Organization
.
WeAreMany.org
.
HaymarketBooks.org
.
Blank-ad-space.gif
.
.
SocialistWorker.org
Recent
E-mail Alerts
RSS
Donate
International Socialist Org.
Who We Are
Where We Stand
Contact Us
War/Antiwar
Economy
National
International
Opinion
History/Traditions
Labor
Activist News
Readers' Views
Books/Entertainment
Published by the International Socialist Organization