What Marx Was Really Saying
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_marx_was_really_saying_20150916/
Posted on Sep 23, 2015
By Douglas Lain
A stone bust of Karl Marx. (erdquadrat / CC BY 2.0)
Within a few weeks of its publication in late May, the essay "Karl Marx Was
Right," by Truthdig columnist Chris Hedges, was viewed over 170,000 times.
It is fair to say that the piece's popularity is due partly to renewed
interest in Marx's work. Since the Great Recession of 2007, the image of
Karl Marx has returned to the scene of political and economic debate. But
among popular audiences, his careful analysis of capitalism has not. The
Marx we encounter online is akin to the Mark Twain or Albert Einstein-pick
your favorite historical figure-we meet in memes that litter Twitter and
Facebook. That is, they do not represent the man's work in its full
complexity.
Take, for instance, a video titled "Political Theory-Karl Marx," produced by
Alain de Botton's organization, School of Life. In it the narrator describes
Marx's theory of alienation by saying that under capitalism, workers don't
"see themselves in the objects they have created"; that is, they merely
bring into being what others created through imagination. What Marx actually
said is that under capitalism, a worker's labor is used against him. In his
"Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844," Marx wrote that "the
worker becomes all the poorer the more wealth he produces, the more his
production increases in power and size. The worker becomes an ever cheaper
commodity the more commodities he creates."
Marx's theory wasn't about feelings. It wasn't psychological. It was about
how the phenomena of private property, profit, rent and wages intrinsic to
capitalism function to create class divisions and impoverish and debase
workers.
Elsewhere on YouTube, The Curious Classroom says in "A Brief Introduction to
Marxism" that "Marxism views capitalist society as being based on a system
that encourages inequality because the rich will always need someone to do
the work that they don't want to do." Again, Marx did not say this. Rather,
he argued that capitalism is premised on the existence of a class of people
who own nothing but their bodies and their capacity for labor, and that
economic production under this order necessarily entails the exploitation of
workers through the forced extraction of their labor.
There are many reasons why Marx is often misinterpreted or even ignored by
those purporting to revitalize and explain him. The one that concerns me
here is that, as mental processes go, intuition-the act of quickly and
instinctively feeling one's way to a conclusion-is far easier than careful,
conscious reasoning, including when it comes to politics.
I am not free of this impulse. I became a leftist while studying philosophy
at Portland State University, but the two pursuits didn't merge until later.
In studying philosophy I was told that all the conclusions reached by all
the philosophers were wrong. From Plato to Wittgenstein, every philosophical
system conceived and written down had ended in failure. If the same fate
awaited any complex reasoning I would develop, it seemed to me that I would
have to find truth in a different way. It wasn't through careful reasoning
that I would find it, but by testing my ideas in the everyday world.
I was secure in this approach for a number of years. But when the economic
crisis struck in 2007, it became clear that the answers life was throwing
before me were not good enough.
As Congress debated a banking bailout, I felt as insecure and frightened as
I had six years earlier, after the attacks of 9/11. In some ways, it was
worse. The difference was that, in regard to 9/11, I felt confident that I
knew what an airplane was, what terrorists sought to do, and what oil
supplies and religious fundamentalism were. I was ignorant of the causes of
the economic crisis, a more abstract catastrophe. What was a mortgage-backed
security? And how could such an exotic thing be responsible for the calamity
we were watching unfold on CNN? In the break room at work, it appeared that
none of my colleagues had a clue, and the leftist commentators on Pacifica
and NPR seemed as conflicted and confused as we were.
Confusion about the causes and dynamics of the crisis has persisted since
then. And though the star of Marx has risen above it, in most discussions it
has shed no light.
What's most ironic is that one of the reasons the image of Marx is more
popular than Marx's ideas-one of the causes of this very common turn from
thinking to intuition-is the popularity of a specific misinterpretation of
Marx.
Marx is known to have railed against philosophers. In his "Theses on
Feuerbach," he wrote that "the philosophers have only interpreted the world
... the point is to change it."
Many readers have interpreted Marx to have meant that, rather than worry
about abstract ideas and explanations, we should simply act to make
revolution. In May 1968, student protesters spray-painted walls with the
slogan "Structures don't take to the streets!" By that they meant that many
academic theories are irrelevant. The students felt that theories and
explanations were cut off from life and action, and therefore of no use.
But again, the students were not in agreement with Marx. The aim of Marx was
not to dispense with philosophy but to realize it. He wanted not to abandon
theory and thought, but to put critique into action.
Today, if we wish the resurgence of Marx to include his ideas rather than
just his image, we will have to do more than intuit what is right in his
work. We will have to read his work critically, which is to say we will have
to struggle against the habit of thinking by feeling.
Douglas Lain is a novelist, short story writer and publisher of Zero Books,
which specializes in philosophy and political theory. His novel Billy Moon
featured a fictional retelling of the events of May 1968 in Paris. His
latest novel is "After the Saucers Landed." He hosts the Zero Books podcast
"Zero Squared" where he interviews philosophers, writers, activists and
economists, and lives in Portland, Ore., with his wife and children.
http://www.truthdig.com/ http://www.truthdig.com/
What Marx Was Really Saying
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_marx_was_really_saying_20150916/
Posted on Sep 23, 2015
By Douglas Lain
A stone bust of Karl Marx. (erdquadrat / CC BY 2.0)
Within a few weeks of its publication in late May, the essay "Karl Marx Was
Right," by Truthdig columnist Chris Hedges, was viewed over 170,000 times.
It is fair to say that the piece's popularity is due partly to renewed
interest in Marx's work. Since the Great Recession of 2007, the image of
Karl Marx has returned to the scene of political and economic debate. But
among popular audiences, his careful analysis of capitalism has not. The
Marx we encounter online is akin to the Mark Twain or Albert Einstein-pick
your favorite historical figure-we meet in memes that litter Twitter and
Facebook. That is, they do not represent the man's work in its full
complexity.
Take, for instance, a video titled "Political Theory-Karl Marx," produced by
Alain de Botton's organization, School of Life. In it the narrator describes
Marx's theory of alienation by saying that under capitalism, workers don't
"see themselves in the objects they have created"; that is, they merely
bring into being what others created through imagination. What Marx actually
said is that under capitalism, a worker's labor is used against him. In his
"Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844," Marx wrote that "the
worker becomes all the poorer the more wealth he produces, the more his
production increases in power and size. The worker becomes an ever cheaper
commodity the more commodities he creates."
Marx's theory wasn't about feelings. It wasn't psychological. It was about
how the phenomena of private property, profit, rent and wages intrinsic to
capitalism function to create class divisions and impoverish and debase
workers.
Elsewhere on YouTube, The Curious Classroom says in "A Brief Introduction to
Marxism" that "Marxism views capitalist society as being based on a system
that encourages inequality because the rich will always need someone to do
the work that they don't want to do." Again, Marx did not say this. Rather,
he argued that capitalism is premised on the existence of a class of people
who own nothing but their bodies and their capacity for labor, and that
economic production under this order necessarily entails the exploitation of
workers through the forced extraction of their labor.
There are many reasons why Marx is often misinterpreted or even ignored by
those purporting to revitalize and explain him. The one that concerns me
here is that, as mental processes go, intuition-the act of quickly and
instinctively feeling one's way to a conclusion-is far easier than careful,
conscious reasoning, including when it comes to politics.
I am not free of this impulse. I became a leftist while studying philosophy
at Portland State University, but the two pursuits didn't merge until later.
In studying philosophy I was told that all the conclusions reached by all
the philosophers were wrong. From Plato to Wittgenstein, every philosophical
system conceived and written down had ended in failure. If the same fate
awaited any complex reasoning I would develop, it seemed to me that I would
have to find truth in a different way. It wasn't through careful reasoning
that I would find it, but by testing my ideas in the everyday world.
I was secure in this approach for a number of years. But when the economic
crisis struck in 2007, it became clear that the answers life was throwing
before me were not good enough.
As Congress debated a banking bailout, I felt as insecure and frightened as
I had six years earlier, after the attacks of 9/11. In some ways, it was
worse. The difference was that, in regard to 9/11, I felt confident that I
knew what an airplane was, what terrorists sought to do, and what oil
supplies and religious fundamentalism were. I was ignorant of the causes of
the economic crisis, a more abstract catastrophe. What was a mortgage-backed
security? And how could such an exotic thing be responsible for the calamity
we were watching unfold on CNN? In the break room at work, it appeared that
none of my colleagues had a clue, and the leftist commentators on Pacifica
and NPR seemed as conflicted and confused as we were.
Confusion about the causes and dynamics of the crisis has persisted since
then. And though the star of Marx has risen above it, in most discussions it
has shed no light.
What's most ironic is that one of the reasons the image of Marx is more
popular than Marx's ideas-one of the causes of this very common turn from
thinking to intuition-is the popularity of a specific misinterpretation of
Marx.
Marx is known to have railed against philosophers. In his "Theses on
Feuerbach," he wrote that "the philosophers have only interpreted the world
... the point is to change it."
Many readers have interpreted Marx to have meant that, rather than worry
about abstract ideas and explanations, we should simply act to make
revolution. In May 1968, student protesters spray-painted walls with the
slogan "Structures don't take to the streets!" By that they meant that many
academic theories are irrelevant. The students felt that theories and
explanations were cut off from life and action, and therefore of no use.
But again, the students were not in agreement with Marx. The aim of Marx was
not to dispense with philosophy but to realize it. He wanted not to abandon
theory and thought, but to put critique into action.
Today, if we wish the resurgence of Marx to include his ideas rather than
just his image, we will have to do more than intuit what is right in his
work. We will have to read his work critically, which is to say we will have
to struggle against the habit of thinking by feeling.
Douglas Lain is a novelist, short story writer and publisher of Zero Books,
which specializes in philosophy and political theory. His novel Billy Moon
featured a fictional retelling of the events of May 1968 in Paris. His
latest novel is "After the Saucers Landed." He hosts the Zero Books podcast
"Zero Squared" where he interviews philosophers, writers, activists and
economists, and lives in Portland, Ore., with his wife and children.
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/dalai_lamas_sexist_remarks_anger
_equality_activists_20150925/
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/dalai_lamas_sexist_remarks_anger
_equality_activists_20150925/
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/dalai_lamas_sexist_remarks_anger
_equality_activists_20150925/
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/fifa_chief_sepp_blatter_faces_cr
iminal_investigation_in_switzerland_20/
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/fifa_chief_sepp_blatter_faces_cr
iminal_investigation_in_switzerland_20/
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/fifa_chief_sepp_blatter_faces_cr
iminal_investigation_in_switzerland_20/
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/video_chris_hedges_on_pope_francis_he_h
as_not_stood_up_and_offered_an_alter/
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/video_chris_hedges_on_pope_francis_he_h
as_not_stood_up_and_offered_an_alter/
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/video_chris_hedges_on_pope_francis_he_h
as_not_stood_up_and_offered_an_alter/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pope_francis_elevates_the_discourse_on_c
apitol_hill_20150925/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pope_francis_elevates_the_discourse_on_c
apitol_hill_20150925/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pope_francis_elevates_the_discourse_on_c
apitol_hill_20150925/ http://www.truthdig.com/ http://www.truthdig.com/
http://www.truthdig.com/about/http://www.truthdig.com/contact/http://www.tru
thdig.com/about/advertising/http://www.truthdig.com/user_agreement/http://ww
w.truthdig.com/privacy_policy/http://www.truthdig.com/about/comment_policy/
C 2015 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
http://www.hopstudios.com/
http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
http://www.facebook.com/truthdighttp://twitter.com/intent/follow?source=foll
owbutton&variant=1.0&screen_name=truthdighttps://plus.google.com/+truthdight
tp://www.linkedin.com/company/truthdighttp://truthdig.tumblr.com/http://www.
truthdig.com/connect
