[blind-democracy] Victory for public education in Massachusetts referendum

  • From: "Roger Loran Bailey" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 09:19:50 -0500

https://socialistaction.org/2016/12/15/victory-for-public-education-in-mass-referendum/


Victory for public education in Massachusetts referendum

/ 2 days ago


By JOE AUCIELLO

— BOSTON — In Massachusetts, a November ballot question that would have allowed for the creation of up to 12 new charter schools per year was soundly defeated. What’s more, the most resounding setbacks for charter supporters occurred in the very cities where the new schools would have been formed. In Boston, where charter schools were promoted as the alternative to mediocre or failing schools, the ballot initiative lost by 24 percentage points, 62 percent to 38 percent.

Charter schools are public schools, but they operate separately from local school districts and local school boards. Teachers, for instance, are not required to have state certification. The schools typically have no teachers’ union and are not required to adhere to union contracts.

Equally important, if not more so, is the fact that funding for charters schools comes from tuition paid by the students’ local school districts. This reduces the amount of money available to serve students in the “sending” schools, resulting in a statewide loss to public education of an estimated $400 million. Considering that public schools are already chronically underfunded, the real loss is far greater.

Massachusetts now has 80 charter schools, with an enrollment of more than 40,000 students. Another 30,000 students, including many minority children, are currently on charter school waiting lists.

This electoral contest was a vote with national implications. From 2003-2013, the number of charter schools throughout the United States more than doubled, from approximately 3000 to 7000, with 3 million students. Had the results been different, the Massachusetts campaign for charter schools would have become a template for similar initiatives to defund and dismantle public education in other states. The conservative agenda that is hostile to teachers’ unions would have scored a victory by increasing the number of schools where union contracts are not allowed.

Such measures, as former Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders noted, were “Wall Street’s attempt to line their own pockets while draining resources away from public education at the expense of low-income, special education students, and English language learners” (Cape Cod Times, Nov. 2, 2016).

So, when the state teachers’ unions went on a campaign to mobilize their members to counter the charter school propaganda, teachers turned out in large numbers, talking to voters directly in door-to-door efforts and by staffing phone banks.

The ballot proposal in favor of charter schools did not fail through lack of funds, prominent backers, or a professional organizing effort. Twelve million dollars was raised by September, and an additional $12 million was spent before the November election. That $24 million set a record for money spent on any ballot question in Massachusetts. It was also $10 million more than the amount raised by state and national teachers’ organizations. Much of the money was spent on well-produced, skillfully written television commercials featuring charter school teachers in their classrooms, spinning feel-good messages. These ads assured viewers that charter schools not only enhance learning opportunities for their students, they do so without creating any ill effect on public education.

In a brazen blend of political acumen and deceit, the commercials asserted what is not true while not actually lying. They claimed that charter schools reimburse costs to the public schools for the students who leave. In Barnstable County, for instance, the reimbursement rate was approximately 15 percent, which meant that Cape Cod and Islands schools lost roughly $15 million. These misleading ads flooded the airwaves and completely outspent the opposing message.

The source of this ample, pro-charter treasure chest was deliberately made obscure. In addition to support from figures like the heirs to the Walmart fortune, the largest source of funding was a New York-based organization called “Families for Excellent Schools.” Despite requests from journalists, this umbrella organization has not revealed its donors, which may well include a contingent of corporations.

From 2003-2013, the number of charter schools throughout the United States more than doubled, from approximately 3000 to 7000, with 3 million students. An electoral setback in one state is not the end.

The defeat of the right-wing agenda in Massachusetts is a significant one—it shows that money and propaganda do not make victory inevitable—but the triumph is not yet decisive. The anti-union reactionaries also rally around the slogan: “The struggle continues.” What’s more, they possess the resources to mount another campaign practically anywhere in the country.

As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump spoke of increasing the number of charter schools and voucher programs, which provide students with public funds for private school tuition, including religious schools. President-elect Trump’s appointment of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education, an advocate for “school choice”—that is, charter schools and voucher programs—shows that before long the battle to defend public education will need to be joined once again.






Share this:

Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)


December 15, 2016 in Education & Schools.


Related posts





Chicago teachers defeat plan to gut schools





Chicago school closings challenged


Members of the Chicago Teachers Union rallied outside City Hall Wednesday morning before the start of the city council meeting. | Rich Hein/Sun-Times


Chicago teachers, parents demand school funding


Post navigation

← Trump promises more perks for big business

Chronicle of an ‘ordinary’ man in revolutionary times →
















Get Involved!
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action


Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month December 2016 (8) November 2016 (19) October 2016 (12) September 2016 (10) August 2016 (10) July 2016 (14) June 2016 (14) May 2016 (9) April 2016 (12) March 2016 (14) February 2016 (8) January 2016 (11) December 2015 (11) November 2015 (9) October 2015 (8) September 2015 (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (18) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September 1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24) July 1998 (12)

Search

View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActUS’s profile on Twitter
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube


Subscribe to Our Newspaper



Upcoming Events

No upcoming events


Category Cloud

Actions & Protest Africa Anti-War Arts & Culture Black Liberation Canada Caribbean Civil Liberties Cuba East Asia Economy Education & Schools Elections Environment Europe Immigration Indigenous Rights International Labor Latin America Latino Civil Liberties Marxist Theory & History Middle East National Oppression Police & FBI Prisons South Asia Uncategorized Vote Socialist Action Women's Liberation


View Calendar


Blog at WordPress.com.




































https://socialistaction.org/2016/12/15/victory-for-public-education-in-mass-referendum/


Victory for public education in Massachusetts referendum

/ 2 days ago


By JOE AUCIELLO

— BOSTON — In Massachusetts, a November ballot question that would have allowed for the creation of up to 12 new charter schools per year was soundly defeated. What’s more, the most resounding setbacks for charter supporters occurred in the very cities where the new schools would have been formed. In Boston, where charter schools were promoted as the alternative to mediocre or failing schools, the ballot initiative lost by 24 percentage points, 62 percent to 38 percent.

Charter schools are public schools, but they operate separately from local school districts and local school boards. Teachers, for instance, are not required to have state certification. The schools typically have no teachers’ union and are not required to adhere to union contracts.

Equally important, if not more so, is the fact that funding for charters schools comes from tuition paid by the students’ local school districts. This reduces the amount of money available to serve students in the “sending” schools, resulting in a statewide loss to public education of an estimated $400 million. Considering that public schools are already chronically underfunded, the real loss is far greater.

Massachusetts now has 80 charter schools, with an enrollment of more than 40,000 students. Another 30,000 students, including many minority children, are currently on charter school waiting lists.

This electoral contest was a vote with national implications. From 2003-2013, the number of charter schools throughout the United States more than doubled, from approximately 3000 to 7000, with 3 million students. Had the results been different, the Massachusetts campaign for charter schools would have become a template for similar initiatives to defund and dismantle public education in other states. The conservative agenda that is hostile to teachers’ unions would have scored a victory by increasing the number of schools where union contracts are not allowed.

Such measures, as former Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders noted, were “Wall Street’s attempt to line their own pockets while draining resources away from public education at the expense of low-income, special education students, and English language learners” (Cape Cod Times, Nov. 2, 2016).

So, when the state teachers’ unions went on a campaign to mobilize their members to counter the charter school propaganda, teachers turned out in large numbers, talking to voters directly in door-to-door efforts and by staffing phone banks.

The ballot proposal in favor of charter schools did not fail through lack of funds, prominent backers, or a professional organizing effort. Twelve million dollars was raised by September, and an additional $12 million was spent before the November election. That $24 million set a record for money spent on any ballot question in Massachusetts. It was also $10 million more than the amount raised by state and national teachers’ organizations. Much of the money was spent on well-produced, skillfully written television commercials featuring charter school teachers in their classrooms, spinning feel-good messages. These ads assured viewers that charter schools not only enhance learning opportunities for their students, they do so without creating any ill effect on public education.

In a brazen blend of political acumen and deceit, the commercials asserted what is not true while not actually lying. They claimed that charter schools reimburse costs to the public schools for the students who leave. In Barnstable County, for instance, the reimbursement rate was approximately 15 percent, which meant that Cape Cod and Islands schools lost roughly $15 million. These misleading ads flooded the airwaves and completely outspent the opposing message.

The source of this ample, pro-charter treasure chest was deliberately made obscure. In addition to support from figures like the heirs to the Walmart fortune, the largest source of funding was a New York-based organization called “Families for Excellent Schools.” Despite requests from journalists, this umbrella organization has not revealed its donors, which may well include a contingent of corporations.

From 2003-2013, the number of charter schools throughout the United States more than doubled, from approximately 3000 to 7000, with 3 million students. An electoral setback in one state is not the end.

The defeat of the right-wing agenda in Massachusetts is a significant one—it shows that money and propaganda do not make victory inevitable—but the triumph is not yet decisive. The anti-union reactionaries also rally around the slogan: “The struggle continues.” What’s more, they possess the resources to mount another campaign practically anywhere in the country.

As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump spoke of increasing the number of charter schools and voucher programs, which provide students with public funds for private school tuition, including religious schools. President-elect Trump’s appointment of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education, an advocate for “school choice”—that is, charter schools and voucher programs—shows that before long the battle to defend public education will need to be joined once again.






Share this:

Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)


December 15, 2016 in Education & Schools.


Related posts





Chicago teachers defeat plan to gut schools





Chicago school closings challenged


Members of the Chicago Teachers Union rallied outside City Hall Wednesday morning before the start of the city council meeting. | Rich Hein/Sun-Times


Chicago teachers, parents demand school funding


Post navigation

← Trump promises more perks for big business

Chronicle of an ‘ordinary’ man in revolutionary times →
















Get Involved!
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action


Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month December 2016 (8) November 2016 (19) October 2016 (12) September 2016 (10) August 2016 (10) July 2016 (14) June 2016 (14) May 2016 (9) April 2016 (12) March 2016 (14) February 2016 (8) January 2016 (11) December 2015 (11) November 2015 (9) October 2015 (8) September 2015 (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (18) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September 1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24) July 1998 (12)

Search

View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActUS’s profile on Twitter
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube


Subscribe to Our Newspaper



Upcoming Events

No upcoming events


Category Cloud

Actions & Protest Africa Anti-War Arts & Culture Black Liberation Canada Caribbean Civil Liberties Cuba East Asia Economy Education & Schools Elections Environment Europe Immigration Indigenous Rights International Labor Latin America Latino Civil Liberties Marxist Theory & History Middle East National Oppression Police & FBI Prisons South Asia Uncategorized Vote Socialist Action Women's Liberation


View Calendar


Blog at WordPress.com.






































Other related posts:

  • » [blind-democracy] Victory for public education in Massachusetts referendum - Roger Loran Bailey