The US is also actively helping the Saudis find targets. Our military is
actively involved in the war. And, of course, our corporations are selling
weapons to them to use in Yemen.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Evan Reese
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2018 5:18 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: US Calls for Ceasefire, Keeps Attacking Yemen
Unfortunately, as I feared, it looks like Khashoggi's murder is going to go
without much consequence.
This article doesn't mention it, but someone I heard who seemed to know what
he was talking about a few weeks ago when Khashoggi was still in the news
pointed out that the U.S. could effectively ground the Saudi air force by
simply stopping the delivery of spare parts.
I can't recall anyone either in Congress, much less at the White House,
mentioning that as a possible sanction.
Sadly, as long as the people in power in Washington have this fixation about
Iran, it looks like Carte Blanch for Saudi Arabia.
Evan
-----Original Message-----
From: Miriam Vieni
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2018 4:11 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] US Calls for Ceasefire, Keeps Attacking Yemen
US Calls for Ceasefire, Keeps Attacking Yemen By William Boardman, Reader
Supported News
10 November 18
In case you missed it, US efforts to prolong the world's most serious
humanitarian crisis in Yemen continue to succeed spectacularly. US military
support enables the Saudi coalition to continue to bomb markets, docks,
mosques, hospitals, school buses, weddings and funerals, and other civilian
targets with impunity. The Saudis' Yemeni enemy, the Houthi rebels, have no
effective air defenses. On March 26, 2015, with the blessing and tactical
support of the Obama administration, Saudi Arabia and its allies launched an
illegal, genocidal, aggressive war on Houthi-controlled Yemen. Yemen was -
and is - in the midst of a civil war in which the long-oppressed Houthis
overthrew the "legitimate" government that the US and others had imposed on
Yemen. Since March 2015, the US and the Saudi coalition have subjected Yemen
to daily war crimes, not only killing civilians but destroying non-military
targets of all sorts, causing a form of biological warfare with a cholera
plague, as well as massive famine for more than half the country's 25
million people. The UN's World Food Programme (WFP) head said on September
27: "Yemen is a disaster and I don't see any light at the end of the tunnel
right now." Yemen was not a significant issue in the American election, even
as the Trump administration sanctioned and supported military escalation
that heightened the suffering of millions (and that has already killed tens
of thousands).
At the US State Department, on November 7, the press briefing focused on the
ideological basis for punishing Iran for continuing to abide by the nuclear
agreement that the US pulled out of (still joined by Britain, France,
Germany, Russia, and China). The US blames Iran for Yemen, too, with little
persuasive or significant evidence to support the propaganda bias.
Eventually in the briefing there was a question about Yemen, and the
exchange with State Department spokesman Robert Palladino went like this
(edited, with emphasis added):
QUESTION: Yemen?
MR PALLADINO: Yemen? Let's go to Yemen in the back, please.
QUESTION: The fighting around Hodedah [the Yemeni port critical to supplying
food to the region's poorest country that was a food importer before being
attacked] seems to be picking up with - and UNICEF and MSF and all these aid
groups who are saying children are at risk at these hospitals. And I wonder
what's happened to the U.S. call for a ceasefire.
MR PALLADINO: The - well, I would start by saying we closely are following
the developments that are taking place in Hodedah. As the Secretary said,
we've been urging all parties to come to the table, and to recognize that
there's no military victory that can be achieved in Yemen. And we continue
to call for a cessation of hostilities and for all parties to support United
Nations Special Envoy Martin Griffiths in finding a peaceful solution to the
conflict.
QUESTION: So have there been any phone calls?...
MR PALLADINO: We are in daily contact with the special envoy..
QUESTION: Would you call on the Saudi coalition to halt this offensive that
they seem to now be bearing down on in Hodedah?
MR PALLADINO: We've called for a cessation of hostilities.. Please, next
question..
QUESTION: Have you had a miscommunication then, with the Saud-led coalition,
that they're now beginning this offensive?
MR PALLADINO: - our assessment remains the same..
QUESTION: - to put a finer point on that, I mean, did the coalition - the
Saudi coalition that the U.S. supports coordinate with or tell you in
advance that they were going to increase fighting around Hudaydah or did
they just ignore the Secretary's call?
MR PALLADINO: We've been clear with Saudi, Emirati, and Yemeni
[government-in-exile] officials at every level that the destruction of
critical infrastructure or destruction of the delivery of vital (inaudible)
aid and commercial goods is unacceptable, and we are in close contact with
our partners.
QUESTION: Just to follow up on that, because you're not really answering the
question, I mean, the Secretary of State issued a very explicit statement
with the Secretary of Defense saying it was time for this to end and it's
not ending. Do you see that as a slap in the face, and what are you going to
do about it?
MR PALLADINO: . We continue to call for a cessation of hostilities. That is
a cessation of hostilities and vigorous resumption of a political track.
That is the way forward. That's how we are going to ease this humanitarian
crisis. The United States' message remains we need to end this conflict and
replace this conflict with compromise, and that's all I have on this topic
for today.
Within the context of pervasive American deceit regarding Yemen, spokesman
Palladino probably allows for some technical truths to appear. Yes, after
the US called for a ceasefire, the Saudis escalated their bombing of
humanitarian targets. The Saudis may or may not have consulted with the US,
but the Trump administration has no stomach for criticizing this bloodshed
any more than it actively objects to the gutting of Jamal Khashoggi.
According to Palladino, "the destruction of critical infrastructure or
destruction of the delivery of vital (inaudible) aid and commercial goods is
unacceptable," which seems to be a statement of law and decency acceptable
to any humane observer. Palladino implies the lie that these crimes against
humanity are unacceptable to the US, but he doesn't actually say that.
Clearly, having spent years enabling the Saudis in committing war crimes,
the US finds the destruction of Yemen quite acceptable. That's what
Palladino really means when he says the US is "closely following the
developments," in the hope that Yemeni carnage can somehow persuade the
Iranians to trust us.
OK, what about that US call for a ceasefire, why isn't that working?
On October 31, US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis spoke about Yemen at the US
Institute of Peace with presumably unconscious irony. Mattis said,
self-contradictorily and revealingly:
We've got to move toward a peace effort here, and you can't say we're going
to do it sometime in the future. We need to be doing this in the next 30
days. We've admired this problem for long enough down there.
Later the same day, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a statement:
The time is now for the cessation of hostilities.... Substantive
consultations under the UN Special Envoy must commence this November in a
third country.... It is time to end this conflict, replace conflict with
compromise, and allow the Yemeni people to heal through peace and
reconstruction.
There was nary a tweet from the president in all this. Can one presume
anything from that? In September, Pompeo certified to Congress, over the
objections of staff, that the Saudis and their allies were doing their
darnedest to reduce civilian casualties and the US should continue to
support them. This was before the Saudi escalation on Hodedah. There is no
credible evidence anywhere that the US is serious about doing anything to
end the murder of Yemenis. Pompeo proposed that the ceasefire start with the
Houthis ending their not very effective rocket attacks on Saudi Arabia.
That's the way the US deals with aggressive war in the 21st century: support
the aggressor and demand that the victim stop resisting. And the Trump
administration is even considering labeling the Houthi rebels as a terrorist
organization, presumably following a logic that would have made the 1943
Warsaw Ghetto resistance into terrorists. Bad faith has no limits.
Both Mattis and Pompeo tried to appear as if they were taking immediate
action, while in the next breath putting off any action for the near future.
The supposed ceasefire has now receded toward 2019 as the UN's Yemen envoy
bows to the reality of US inaction and Saudi escalation.
If the US were actually serious about peace and humanitarian aid for Yemen,
the US could exercise leadership in the UN Security Council to force a peace
process. The US could unilaterally take immediate and forceful actions to
stop the war. Pompeo could rescind the bad joke of certifying the Saudis as
conscientious and responsible. That might not be enough, so Mattis could
disengage the US military from the genocidal bombing campaign. Without US
support - including cluster bombs and other ordnance - the Saudi aggression
would falter if not fail. Rather than act rationally, Pompeo and Mattis
chose to posture and preen in a charade of peace-loving rhetoric.
Well, their hollow performance was on Halloween after all, and that was
perhaps the point. This was high-level US dishonesty, a shabby
trick-or-treat deceit. It's all trick for Yemen and endless treats for the
Saudis. And for its lack of trouble, the US gets more and more blood on its
hands.
Late on Friday, November 9, the US and Saudis announced that - at some
unstated future time - the US will stop refueling Saudi bombers attacking
Yemen. This is a cynical charade that will do nothing to reduce the
bloodbath in Yemen, but may fool the gullible in the US that protest works.
First of all, with US help, the Saudis have developed their own mid-air
refueling capability. The cessation of US refueling will have zero impact on
Saudi war-making capacity.
The US will continue to support the Saudi targeting program. The US will
continue to provide the Saudis with military intelligence. The US will
continue to supply the Saudis with weapons and ordnance, including cluster
bombs (designed to kill people and most effective against civilians). The US
will continue to support the Saudi naval blockade, a primary cause of hunger
and famine in Yemen (as intended). None of these or other elements of US
participation in this illegal, genocidal war are addressed in Defense
Secretary Mattis's expertly opaque and misleading statement:
The U.S. and the coalition are planning to collaborate on building up
legitimate Yemeni forces to defend the Yemeni people, secure their country's
borders, and contribute to counter al-Qaida and ISIS efforts in Yemen and
the region.
The US and the coalition are the main attackers of most of the Yemeni
people. The best defense for the Yemeni people is for the attackers to stop
attacking, since the Yemenis remain well within their own borders. The only
part of Yemen under actual Yemeni control is the northwest, where the native
Houthis have governed since 2014. Southeastern Yemen is titularly under the
control of the "legitimate" Yemeni government (based in Riyadh), but is
effectively under a military dictatorship run by the United Arab Emirates.
Eastern Yemen, which is thinly populated, is under fragmentary control of
multiple forces, including ISIS and al-Qaeda, whose fortunes have been
greatly enhanced by the US-Saudi obsession with preventing the Houthis from
controlling their own country.
Mattis is trying to put rouge on a monster and call it beautiful. US policy
in Yemen continues to be based on profound lies with no moral justification.
Oh look, Mattis seems to say, we're washing our hands of refueling bombers
committing war crimes. Even in its narrow truth, this does nothing to
support life or peace, and US hands remain drenched in blood.
Email This Page
William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV,
print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont
judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination
from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
