All true. The rats are abandoning the sinking ship. But not until
they finish grabbing off every last bit of useful fixtures, cleaning
out the banks and tills of all cash, running up debt, and taking the
last raft to safety. What is left behind will look very much like
Haiti.
Carl Jarvis
On 12/14/16, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://socialistaction.org/2016/12/13/trump-promises-more-perks-for-big-business/
Trump promises more perks for big business
/ 14 hours ago
dec-2016-trump-protestBy MARK UGOLINI
Events surrounding the Nov. 8 presidential election confirm the depth of
the crisis that U.S. capitalist rulers find themselves in. We’ve seen
growing turmoil and major divisions between and within both major
parties. The two-party system, for years a stable bulwark of U.S.
capitalism, has been exhibiting signs of distress. The transition of
power from one party to another is not as seamless and predictable as in
the past.
Since the 2008-9 world financial recession, the world economy has
remained in stagnation. Among major factors underlying this crisis is a
generalized decline over many years in overall corporate profits and in
the rate of profit. This stagnation feeds the austerity campaigns of
governments worldwide, taking a massive toll on workers and the most
oppressed.
The United States has seen an ever-escalating capitalist offensive
against working people. Attacks are aimed at overturning gains won in
past struggles of workers and oppressed: real wages have failed to grow
despite productivity growth of nearly 22 percent since the late 1970s,
and severe unemployment persists. It was reported this month that 95
million U.S. workers have dropped out from the workforce, a historic
high. These workers are not accounted for in the monthly
government-reported unemployment rate.
This is combined with speed-up and unsafe conditions on the job, longer
working hours, rapidly vanishing pensions, rapidly escalating
health-care costs, heightened racist violence, and attacks on rights won
in years past by minorities and women. A byproduct of this generalized
offensive has been an accelerated erosion of the social safety
net—government programs designed to help the unemployed and the poor.
Fundamental agreement remains between the capitalist Democratic and
Republican parties to advance forward this assault on working people,
but tactical differences are deepening on exactly what path to follow,
and how quickly and aggressively to proceed.
We can fully expect that the anti-working class offensive, including
racist violence and the anti-immigrant harassment and deportations of
the Obama administration, will continue and most likely accelerate
during the Trump administration.
Trump’s initial steps during the transition, including his selections
for important government posts, can provide some indication of his
priorities but fail to reveal a definite direction. However, hints of
where the new Donald Trump administration may be headed are already
emerging in some areas. Here are three areas that deserve attention:
Regulations and taxes
Among Trump’s first appointments was the selection of Wilbur Ross for
Commerce Secretary and Steven Mnuchin for Secretary of the Treasury. The
selection of Wall Street traders and hedge-fund billionaires to two key
economic positions should be no surprise, despite Trump’s
populist-sounding campaign rhetoric.
Speaking in West Palm Beach, Fla., in October, Donald Trump declared
that it is the “global power structure that is responsible for the
economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our
country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful
of large corporations.” Trump spent millions on media ads promoting that
sentiment, which is felt widely among U.S. workers.
In a series of tweets on Dec. 4, Trump continued the populist rhetoric
of his election campaign, reiterating his pledges to tear up
international trade agreements, declare war on companies that off-shore
their workforce, and add stiff tariffs to goods from countries like
China and Mexico if they are perceived as taking U.S. jobs. The
Washington Post commented on Dec. 5 that “these comments set up a clash
with Republicans who have long argued in favor of free trade and against
excessive intrusion by government into the affairs of business.”
The Post pointed out, however, that although Trump’s stated policies
“put American companies in an extraordinarily difficult position,”
corporate lobbying groups have remained nearly silent for now.
We can expect that in the end, like Obama, the Trump administration will
pursue policies that maximize corporate profits and curry favor from
corporate CEOs, bankers, Wall Street investors, and hedge-fund managers.
Working people will pay, one way or the other.
Trump’s cabinet appointments make this all too clear. The Nov. 30 New
York Times reports that these appointments are “the most powerful signal
yet that Mr. Trump plans to emphasize policies friendly to Wall Street,
like tax cuts and a relaxation of regulation, in the early days of his
administration. … That approach has been cheered by investors (the
stocks of Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley have been
on a tear since the election).”
The measures that Mnuchin and Ross have said will be on the table under
their administration include significant tax breaks for corporations and
the wealthy. This, they promise, will “create more jobs,” a reprise of
the “trickle-down” theory of the Reagan years. A recent study by the Tax
Policy Center found that under the tax policies advocated by Trump, the
country’s richest 1 percent would receive a 13.5% tax reduction, while
the “middle class” as a whole would receive only a 2% reduction and some
would get a tax increase.
Infrastructure projects and job creation
In the last week of the campaign, Trump’s promotion of a massive,
job-creating infrastructure improvement program helped attract the
“rust-belt” working-class voters he needed to put him over the top in
the Electoral College. Trump pledged $1 trillion to a national program
of infrastructure construction and repairs. Since the election, Bernie
Sanders and other Democratic Party leaders offered to work with Trump on
this effort.
Recently, more has been revealed on what Trump supporters in Congress
and Wall Street are envisioning. The Nov. 29 New York Times reported
that Trump’s infrastructure plan was key to Wall Street exuberance
following the Trump victory: “Stock traders celebrating Donald Trump’s
election have been bidding up equity prices on a risky bet. … The hope,
reflected in financial firms’ postelection tip sheets for investors, is
for a robust program of tax cuts and new spending, especially for
infrastructure projects.”
The Times said that while a growing section of Wall Street and
economists have changed their view and now believe greater government
spending is needed to stimulate the economy, Trump’s Republican
followers in Congress had something different in mind, envisioning a
plan laden with massive corporate tax breaks but short on government
stimulus spending.
A noted Goldman Sacks economist “suggested to clients that ‘a modest
infrastructure package’ is more likely. But even that probably would not
come as soon [as] 2017.” If an infrastructure program is developed, it
will most certainly be temporary in nature, and unable to reach a scale
necessary to address the pressing need.
Only a massive and sustained public works program can address society’s
most urgent needs: repairing and constructing housing, roads, and
bridges; adding, modernizing, and refurbishing schools and public
transportation systems; preserving farmland and forests; and initiating
a crash program to upgrade the power grid and transition toward 100
percent renewable energy sources.
Health care and Medicare
Trump appointed Republican Congressman Tom Price as Health and Human
Services Director, responsible for implementing changes in health care.
Price is notorious as an adversary of women’s reproductive rights,
having cosponsored legislation in the House to assign “personhood” to a
fetus.
Price is also a staunch opponent of the Affordable Care Act (ACA or
Obamacare). He wants to replace it with one that also bolsters the
insurance industry, and the rest of the bourgeoning multi-billion-dollar
health-care industry. The Republican goal is a plan that provides
significantly fewer obstacles to profit generation than Obamacare.
Price’s vision is contained in what the Nov. 30 New York Times calls a
“detailed and comprehensive” plan, entitled the Empowering Patients
First Act of 2015, which is still under discussion in Congress.
This is an insurance-based plan without Obama-care’s markets and with
severely reduced federal subsidies. Instead, it would provide
“age-adjusted tax credits” for the purchase of individual and family
health-insurance policies and would promote “health savings accounts”
through Wall Street investment houses. The objective would be to
“encourage” individuals and families to bear the full brunt of insurance
cost, while at the same time raking in hundreds of millions in new
profits via account fees and service charges for the investments houses.
The Republican plan, like ACA, centers on generating profits for
doctors, hospitals, and insurance and pharmaceutical companies. But it
would more drastically slash regulations that stand in the way and
greatly curtail subsidies for the poor. The Times says that the bill
“would, among other things, roll back the federally financed expansion
of Medicaid in 31 states and the District of Columbia, taking coverage
away from 14 million poor people.”
While Trump promises not to touch Medicare, making fundamental changes
to this program enjoys significant bipartisan support in Congress. The
Times reports: “A plan backed by Mr. Price and the House speaker, Paul
Ryan, would turn Medicare … into a program in which people would buy
private insurance through what is known as premium support. The idea is
to turn Medicare into a voucher program, designed to limit federal
spending while forcing seniors to bear more of the cost.”
While we must vigorously oppose any steps toward rollback of Medicare
and Medicaid, and elimination of insurance subsides and other positive
features of ACA like coverage for pre-exiting conditions, the solutions
offered by the capitalist parties don’t come close to addressing the
urgent need for accessible and comprehensive health-care services.
Despite the fact that earlier this year a Gallup poll revealed that 58
percent of Americans support replacing the ACA with a federally funded
health-care system, the two capitalist parties continue to pursue only
plans that promote profits for the powerful big-business interests.
The only truly effective solution is one that takes insurance companies
and profits out of the picture entirely. Neither has anything to do with
providing quality health care. We need a single-payer system as a step
toward a universal, government-funded national program in which health
care is provided to all as a basic right.
The Trump victory and the road ahead
Once the dust settled after Trump’s victory, the “Never Trump”
Republicans began to recognize the changed reality and rally around
their newly anointed president-elect. The Democrats were slower, some in
deep shock; but the “first family” took the lead, with the president
demonstrating unity in a friendly advice-sharing meeting with Donald
Trump, and with a separate exchange of pleasantries between Michelle
Obama and Milania Trump.
Obama pleaded with his reluctant followers to recognize the essential
truth of the two-party system: “We’re actually all on one team.” The
Wall Street backers of Hillary—bankers, traders, speculators, and
hedge-fund market manipulators—were all quick to recognize that nothing
truly important had been lost, as the stock market rose to record-level
highs.
Despite the virulent expressions of racism and sexism displayed by Trump
during the campaign—which gave a swift boost to the ultra-right
fringe—and the steady stream of insults, rants, and repulsive behavior,
millions responded to his populist-sounding message. These voters viewed
Trump as an agent of change—someone capable of shaking things up, who in
a distorted way embodied their distrust and hatred of a political system
and a news media that ridicules, belittles, and ignores them.
Trump made significant inroads among the working class and the rural
poor. The Clinton team had largely abdicated the field of battle for
these votes.
It was the brutal reality that working people experienced during eight
painful Obama years that resulted in the lack of interest and
participation in the election by millions. They remembered Obama’s first
major act as president in 2008, quickly heeding the pleas of the ruling
rich that a massive “bailout” of the banks and hedge funds to the tune
of well over $7 trillion was so urgently needed that the economy would
be hurled into oblivion without it. Remaining in their memory also was
the reality of their rapidly vanishing jobs, unions, and pensions.
Despite Obama’s relative popularity among Blacks, and high turnout in
past elections, sizable numbers of working-class and poor Blacks, whose
conditions worsened over the last eight years, chose to stay away from
the polls on Election Day. They also remembered how Hillary Clinton had
labeled Black inner-city youth “superpredators” and the Clintons’ role
in mass incarceration, promotion of “crime bills,” and the war against
Black women and children in the long-fought campaign to “end welfare as
we know it.”
All this heightened a sense of alienation and fed Trump’s argument that
to Hillary and the Democrats, working people, Blacks, and other
minorities are merely heads to be counted every few years when elections
come rolling around.
As it turned out, only 44 percent of eligible voters made it to the
polls. More Blacks and Latinos voted for Trump than voted for Republican
presidential candidate Mitt Romney in 2012.
While truly deplorable racism expressed itself among white working-class
voters in this election, it has not just now appeared on the scene. It
was bred, fostered, and taught for years by Democratic Party politicians
(some with long histories of close association with the KKK).
Trump won a hearing from white workers on the racist, anti-immigrant
message of “saving American jobs” at the expense of the jobs of
immigrant workers. This jingoist “America first” nationalist ideology is
fully integrated in the propaganda of the reactionary labor union
bureaucracy, which they have taught in union meetings and union
leadership “training” seminars for years.
Most of the labor fakers responsible for promoting this racist message
call themselves progressive Democrats. This ideology is reactionary to
the core, as it pits U.S. workers against Mexican workers and those of
other countries, and is now fully integrated as a core principal within
the Democratic Party.
Essentially, the rise of Trump and his electoral victory is a result of
a vacuum in political leadership within the U.S. working class and the
oppressed. Despite the modest efforts of our Socialist Action
presidential campaign and the campaigns of other small socialist
parties, U.S. workers never had a horse in the race.
A mass political party of labor, organized through its unions and fully
independent of capitalist parties, could have filled this void and
presented a political program advancing the demands of the working
class, opposing all forms of racism and sexism while championing the
struggles and issues of all those oppressed under capitalism.
This is a fighting program, rejecting collaboration with our oppressors,
and relying solely on our capacity to organize independently in mass
struggle to defend our interests.
Share this:
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
December 13, 2016 in Economy, Elections.
Related posts
Unmasking the hype of capitalist economics
Socialist Action sets ambitious goals for the coming year
Greece 2015: Lessons of the defeat
Post navigation
← Somali youth sentenced in ‘Minneapolis Terror Trial’
Get Involved!
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action
Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month December 2016 (6) November 2016 (19)
October 2016 (12) September 2016 (10) August 2016 (10) July 2016
(14) June 2016 (14) May 2016 (9) April 2016 (12) March 2016 (14)
February 2016 (8) January 2016 (11) December 2015 (11) November 2015
(9) October 2015 (8) September 2015 (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015
(13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9)
February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November
2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July
2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014
(9) February 2014 (11) January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November
2013 (11) October 2013 (17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10)
July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March
2013 (12) February 2013 (10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7)
November 2012 (8) October 2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012
(27) July 2012 (18) June 2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14)
March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19) January 2012 (17) December 2011
(3) November 2011 (33) October 2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August
2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011
(15) March 2011 (15) February 2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December
2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3)
August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010
(3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009
(6) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August
2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6)
March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December 2008
(11) November 2008 (8) October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14) August
2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3)
March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11) December 2007
(8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1)
March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11) November 2006
(11) October 2006 (13) September 2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006
(18) June 2006 (7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14)
February 2006 (5) January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9) November 2005
(8) October 2005 (13) September 2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005
(16) June 2005 (16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14)
February 2005 (19) January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14) November 2002
(17) October 2002 (19) September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July
2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January
2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18)
July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21)
August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April
2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20)
December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September
1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999
(27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999
(24) July 1998 (12)
Search
View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActUS’s profile on Twitter
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
Upcoming Events
No upcoming events
Category Cloud
Actions & Protest Africa Anti-War Arts & Culture Black Liberation Canada
Caribbean Civil Liberties Cuba East Asia Economy Education & Schools
Elections Environment Europe Immigration Indigenous Rights International
Labor Latin America Latino Civil Liberties Marxist Theory & History
Middle East National Oppression Police & FBI Prisons South Asia
Uncategorized Vote Socialist Action Women's Liberation
View Calendar
Blog at WordPress.com.
