Our Prince of Peace, standing guard at the gates of the Empire. Proof
that the color of the skin does not effect the state of mind in a man
committed to defending the Status Quo.
Despite the foolishness of the Nobel committee, placing the Peace
Laural upon the head of this Man of Violence, Obama only paused
momentarily in some surprise, as he went forward with the Bush War.
Understanding that Obama is a full, paid up member of the
Establishment's Puppets does not mean we stop pressuring him. Knowing
that Obama has broken or excused most of his campaign promises should
only energize us to double down on efforts to curb his violent nature,
and his eagerness to compromise with the American Private
Corporations. Certainly Obama is not our friend, but it is not
because of who his parents were. It is because he has failed the
Working Class Americans. Of course the Republican Neanderthals in
Congress will hint at his color having an impact upon his character,
but if he were pure white they would find some other insult to build
upon. Which is another subject, but while we're on it, we need to be
clear that despite their rhetoric, Congress is not defending America.
Nor are they concerned with the majority of Americans. Look past
their words and see the mess they've made out ofthis country/world,
and their actions, or lack thereof, speak for them.
Carl Jarvis
On 8/6/15, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greenwald writes: "President Obama yesterday spoke in defense of the Iran
Deal at American University, launching an unusually blunt and aggressive
attack on deal opponents."
Glenn Greenwald. (photo: AP)
To Defend Iran Deal, Obama Boasts That He's Bombed Seven Countries
By Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept
06 August 15
President Obama yesterday spoke in defense of the Iran Deal at American
University, launching an unusually blunt and aggressive attack on deal
opponents. Obama's blistering criticisms aimed at the Israeli government
and
its neocon supporters were accurate and unflinching, including the obvious
fact that what they really crave is regime change and war. About opposition
to the deal from the Israeli government, he said: "it would be an
abrogation
of my constitutional duty to act against my best judgment simply because it
causes temporary friction with a dear friend and ally."
Judged as a speech, it was an impressive and effective rhetorical defense
of
the deal, which is why leading deal opponents have reacted so hysterically.
The editors of Bloomberg News - which has spewed one
Iraq-War-fearmongering-type article after the next about the deal
masquerading as "reporting" - whined that Obama was "denigrating those who
disagree with him" and that "it would be far better to win this fight
fairly." Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pronounced himself
"especially insulted" and said Obama's speech went "way over the line of
civil discourse." Our nation's Churchillian warriors are such sensitive
souls: sociopathically indifferent to the lives they continually extinguish
around the world (provided it all takes place far away from their comfort
and safety), but deeply, deeply hurt - "especially insulted" - by mean
words
directed at them and their motives.
Beyond accurately describing Iran Deal opponents, Obama also accurately
described himself and his own record of militarism. To defend against
charges that he Loves the Terrorists, he boasted:
As commander-in-chief, I have not shied away from using force when
necessary. I have ordered tens of thousands of young Americans into combat.
. . .
I've ordered military action in seven countries.
By "ordered military actions in seven countries," what he means is that he
has ordered bombs dropped, and he has extinguished the lives of thousands
of
innocent people, in seven different countries, all of which just so happen
to be predominantly Muslim.
The list includes one country where he twice escalated a war that was being
waged when he was inaugurated (Afghanistan), another where he withdrew
troops to great fanfare only to then order a new bombing campaign (Iraq),
two countries where he converted very rare bombings into a constant stream
of American violence featuring cluster bombs and "signature strikes"
(Pakistan and Yemen), one country where he continued the policy of bombing
at will (Somalia), and one country where he started a brand new war even in
the face of Congressional rejection of his authorization to do so, leaving
it in tragic shambles (Libya). That doesn't count the aggression by allies
that he sanctioned and supported (in Gaza), nor the proxy wars he enabled
(the current Saudi devastation of Yemen), nor the whole new front of
cyber-attacks he has launched, nor the multiple despots he has propped up,
nor the clandestine bombings that he still has not confirmed (Philippines).
[As the military historian and former U.S. Army Col. Andrew Bacevich noted
in The Washington Post after Obama began bombing Syria, "Syria has become
at
least the 14th country in the Islamic world that U.S. forces have invaded
or
occupied or bombed, and in which American soldiers have killed or been
killed. And that's just since 1980." That is the fact that, by itself,
renders tribalistic westerners who obsessively harp on the violence of
Muslims such obvious self-deluded jokes].
Two recent foreign policy moves are major positive items on Obama's legacy:
normalization of relations with Cuba and agreeing to this deal with Iran.
But, as he himself just proudly touted yesterday, the overall record of the
2009 Nobel Peace Prize laureate is one of violence, militarism and
aggression that has left a pile of dead bodies of innocent people. That
Obama feels the need (or desire) to boast about how many countries he's
bombed, and that the only mainstream criticisms of him in the Iran debate
is
that he is too unwilling to use more aggression and force, says a lot about
Obama, but even more about U.S. political culture. And none of what it says
is good.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not
valid.
Glenn Greenwald. (photo: AP)
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/06/obama-summarizes-record/https:
//firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/08/06/obama-summarizes-record/
To Defend Iran Deal, Obama Boasts That He's Bombed Seven Countries
By Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept
06 August 15
resident Obama yesterday spoke in defense of the Iran Deal at American
University, launching an unusually blunt and aggressive attack on deal
opponents. Obama's blistering criticisms aimed at the Israeli government
and
its neocon supporters were accurate and unflinching, including the obvious
fact that what they really crave is regime change and war. About opposition
to the deal from the Israeli government, he said: "it would be an
abrogation
of my constitutional duty to act against my best judgment simply because it
causes temporary friction with a dear friend and ally."
Judged as a speech, it was an impressive and effective rhetorical defense
of
the deal, which is why leading deal opponents have reacted so hysterically.
The editors of Bloomberg News - which has spewed one
Iraq-War-fearmongering-type article after the next about the deal
masquerading as "reporting" - whined that Obama was "denigrating those who
disagree with him" and that "it would be far better to win this fight
fairly." Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pronounced himself
"especially insulted" and said Obama's speech went "way over the line of
civil discourse." Our nation's Churchillian warriors are such sensitive
souls: sociopathically indifferent to the lives they continually extinguish
around the world (provided it all takes place far away from their comfort
and safety), but deeply, deeply hurt - "especially insulted" - by mean
words
directed at them and their motives.
Beyond accurately describing Iran Deal opponents, Obama also accurately
described himself and his own record of militarism. To defend against
charges that he Loves the Terrorists, he boasted:
As commander-in-chief, I have not shied away from using force when
necessary. I have ordered tens of thousands of young Americans into combat.
. . .
I've ordered military action in seven countries.
By "ordered military actions in seven countries," what he means is that he
has ordered bombs dropped, and he has extinguished the lives of thousands
of
innocent people, in seven different countries, all of which just so happen
to be predominantly Muslim.
The list includes one country where he twice escalated a war that was being
waged when he was inaugurated (Afghanistan), another where he withdrew
troops to great fanfare only to then order a new bombing campaign (Iraq),
two countries where he converted very rare bombings into a constant stream
of American violence featuring cluster bombs and "signature strikes"
(Pakistan and Yemen), one country where he continued the policy of bombing
at will (Somalia), and one country where he started a brand new war even in
the face of Congressional rejection of his authorization to do so, leaving
it in tragic shambles (Libya). That doesn't count the aggression by allies
that he sanctioned and supported (in Gaza), nor the proxy wars he enabled
(the current Saudi devastation of Yemen), nor the whole new front of
cyber-attacks he has launched, nor the multiple despots he has propped up,
nor the clandestine bombings that he still has not confirmed (Philippines).
[As the military historian and former U.S. Army Col. Andrew Bacevich noted
in The Washington Post after Obama began bombing Syria, "Syria has become
at
least the 14th country in the Islamic world that U.S. forces have invaded
or
occupied or bombed, and in which American soldiers have killed or been
killed. And that's just since 1980." That is the fact that, by itself,
renders tribalistic westerners who obsessively harp on the violence of
Muslims such obvious self-deluded jokes].
Two recent foreign policy moves are major positive items on Obama's legacy:
normalization of relations with Cuba and agreeing to this deal with Iran.
But, as he himself just proudly touted yesterday, the overall record of the
2009 Nobel Peace Prize laureate is one of violence, militarism and
aggression that has left a pile of dead bodies of innocent people. That
Obama feels the need (or desire) to boast about how many countries he's
bombed, and that the only mainstream criticisms of him in the Iran debate
is
that he is too unwilling to use more aggression and force, says a lot about
Obama, but even more about U.S. political culture. And none of what it says
is good.
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
