The Surprising List of Democrats Who Just -- Gratuitously -- Bowed to Big
Finance
Thursday, May 24, 2018
By David Dayen, In These Times | Report
In a win for amnesia, Congress advanced a bipartisan bill on Tuesday
deregulating the banking industry, just a decade after Wall Street triggered
a financial crisis that caused millions to lose their jobs and their homes.
S.2155, known as the Crapo bill both for its co-author, Senate Banking
Committee chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), and its general quality, was pitched
as a narrow measure to provide relief for salt-of-the-earth community banks
and credit unions. But anyone making that claim is either misinformed or
trying to spin the truth.
In reality, the Crapo bill will deregulate 25 of the 38 largest banks in
America, weaken capital requirements that force banks to pay for their own
mistakes, free some lenders from disclosing data used to detect lending
discrimination and largely handcuff the Federal Reserve's ability to apply
special regulations to the biggest banks, to name just a few provisions.
Plus, the changes have already begun to consolidate the banking sector, with
the very community banks the bill was intended to help being scooped up by
larger rivals. Combined with efforts inside the agencies that regulate banks
to weaken rules, it represents a pendulum shift away from safety and toward
another financial crisis.
Who would agree to such bleak legislation, and why? Well, it fits with the
Republican project of impeding government's ability to protect the public;
out of 276 GOP members of Congress voting on the Crapo bill, 275 voted in
favor (Walter Jones, an apostate House member from North Carolina, was the
only one to oppose it). A bigger surprise came in how many Democrats were
willing to sign on: 16 Senators and 33 House members.
Senate Democrats like Jon Tester (Mont.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.) and Joe
Donnelly (Ind.) co-authored, co-sponsored and stepped forward as the public
faces of the Crapo bill. Because of Senate filibuster rules, the Crapo bill
would have died without Senate Democratic support. Why they considered this
vital to the nation's functioning is anybody's guess, although Tester,
Heitkamp and Donnelly did shift from receiving few campaign donations from
the financial industry to grabbing $469,841 since 2017. Also taking
criticism is Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), a Senate Minority Leader who represents
Wall Street and who gave his blessing to caucus members to freelance on
deregulation.
The situation in the House was different. Because of its majority-vote
rules, no Democrats were required for passage; and with Republicans unified,
the outcome was pre-determined. On Capitol Hill, this is called a free vote.
If Democrats wanted to show their fealty to bank lobbyists, earning some
campaign scratch and perhaps a future job, they could vote yes. If they
wanted to align with constituents for whom deregulating banks is an
exceedingly low priority, they could vote no.
In the end, supporters included recipients of millions of dollars from the
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, donations from well-intentioned
liberals who may not have expected their support to flow to bank sycophants:
Ami Bera ($2.5 million in 2016), Stephanie Murphy ($3.6 million), Tom
O'Halleran ($2.1 million), Josh Gottheimer ($1.5 million), Brad Schneider
($1 million) and Rick Nolan ($4.2 million, but generally a liberal vote who
is retiring this year, and a surprising entry here).
Twenty-seven members of the conservative New Democrat Coalition supplied
nearly all of the Democratic votes. There were three Blue Dogs who were not
included on the New Democrat Coalition list. Perhaps more surprising is the
presence of nine members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC). Sadly,
pro-Wall Street votes have been a nagging trend for certain CBC members.
Finally, you have Democrats representing parts of downstate New York
(Kathleen Rice,Tom Suozzi), New Jersey (Gottheimer) and Connecticut (Jim
Himes), where finance congregates and thrives.
Perhaps more interesting than those who did succumb to the wishes of Big
Finance are the Democrats who didn't -- who head into the midterm elections
on a path based on principle instead of expediency.
For example, Conor Lamb (Penn.), the most recent member of the Democratic
caucus, who won a deep-red seat in western Pennsylvania and was seen as a
textbook moderate, voted against the Crapo bill. Indeed, it is moderate to
recognize that banks didn't really need relief at a time when they earned
$56 billion in profits in the first quarter of the year, a new record.
Beto O'Rourke (D-Tex.) and Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), both running for US Senate
in purple to red seats, voted no as well, showing that ambitions for higher
office didn't have to mean accommodating financial institutions. Arizona
Senate candidate Kyrsten Sinema didn't agree, continuing her appalling
record on core economic issues.
The entire Democratic delegations in Michigan and Virginia decided not to go
along with their colleagues in the Senate, all of whom voted for the bill.
The delegation of Ohio, another purple-to-red state, followed the leadership
of Senator Sherrod Brown, also voting no.
The idea that it was just impossible for moderate or red-state Democrats to
oppose the fearsome power of the banking lobby on this bill doesn't hold up
to these results. Nor should it. There was no constituency for this bill
outside K-Street high-rises and executive boardrooms. The alleged community
bank relief pales in comparison to the more important measures given to the
big boys. Passing the Crapo bill doesn't help you win a close election; in
fact, you probably won't see it in anyone's campaign ads this year. And if
it was just about money, the industry has shown time and again that they'll
shovel far more to the Republican side of the aisle no matter what a
Democrat does.
Every single bank deregulation bill of the last 40 years has been thoroughly
bipartisan. In a sad moment for the country, one can at least take solace in
the fact that far more Democrats than usual recognized the politics of the
issue and made the obvious choice to stand with homeowners, borrowers, and
hard-working citizens over Wall Street.
You can fuel thoughtful, authority-challenging journalism: Click here to
make a tax-deductible donation to Truthout.
Originally published at InTheseTimes.com.
David Dayen
David Dayen is a freelance journalist and the author of Chain of Title: How
Three Ordinary Americans Uncovered Wall Street's Great Foreclosure Fraud,
winner of the Studs and Ida Terkel Prize. He lives in Los Angeles, where
prior to writing about politics he had a 19-year career as a television
producer and editor.
Related Stories
Community Banking Is Alive, Well: The Three Myths About Dodd-Frank and
Community Banks
By Kathryn Milani, Roosevelt Institute | Op-Ed
You Can't Be Serious: Debunking the Dangerous Arguments Against Dodd-Frank
By Sue Banks, Occupy.com | Op-Ed
"We Are Lurching Toward Plutocracy": Rep. Ellison on Rollback of Key
Dodd-Frank Banking Regulations
By Juan González, Amy Goodman, Democracy Now! | Video Interview
