I am not really effected that much by the floods this time. On the day
of the huge storms that we got I was without electricity until
midafternoon and then my Internet access was out for the rest of the
day, but that was about the worse that happened. My house is on the
lower slope of a mountain, but still high enough that to be flooded
there would be many thousands of other people flooded first. The road in
front of my house does flood about twice a year and it did this time
too, but did not stay flooded as long as it does on other occasions.
Most of the damage in this county happened on the opposite end of the
county from where I live and the greatest damage was in other counties.
Billionaire and gubernatorial candidate James Justice had to cancel his
annual golf tournament because the golf course was flooded. In other
counties people's houses were completely washed away, but right here it
seems to be okay. I suppose the casino owners are happy about that.
On 6/28/2016 12:59 PM, Carl Jarvis wrote:
Roger,
The news out of West Virginia sounds grim. How are you doing?
Hopefully dry and well fed?
I was a bit taken off guard when the mayor of a small town told
reporters that his town was, "Blessed", because no lives were lost. I
thought of the unemployment numbers in West Virginia, and of the rape
of the natural resources, and the indifferent destruction of the
mountain tops, and of the growing numbers of small businesses boarding
up their shops and laying off their employees, and I wonder how a man
could say, "Blessed" in the face of all of this.
I understand that West Virginia is in a battle with Mississippi for
the title of, "Poorest State in the Union". Of course if it were a
State, Puerto Rico would walk away with the title, along with the
giant sign that reads, "Plundered and Raped and then Ignored. God
Bless America!"
Carl Jarvis
On 6/28/16, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://socialistaction.org/2016/06/27/supreme-court-strikes-down-texas-anti-abortion-law/
Supreme Court strikes down Texas anti-abortion law
/ 12 hours ago
July 2016 AbortionBy ANN MONTAGUE
— JUNE 27 — Women are celebrating today in front of the U.S. Supreme
Court Building after a 5-3 ruling reaffirmed Roe v. Wade and struck down
two provisions of a Texas state law that restricts women’s access to
abortion. The 2013 law that the court nullified required all abortions
to take place in ambulatory surgical centers or mini hospitals, instead
of regular clinics. Many state legislatures have passed laws similar to
the Texas law, which are designed to regulate abortion clinics out of
existence.
These so-called TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) laws
violate a woman’s right to safe and legal abortion. The Texas law HB 2
requires clinics to invest in expensive building upgrades to meet the
more stringent standards of ambulatory surgical centers. It also
mandates that doctors obtain admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.
National Advocates For Pregnant Women (NAPW) and the NYU School of Law
Reproductive Justice Clinic filed an amicus brief on behalf of 14
organizations saying that the Texas law would prevent some women from
having an abortion; force others to have an abortion outside of safe
medical settings; and make those who do so potential targets for arrest
and prosecution. The Court’s decision today strikes down that law.
This decision came in the context of increased numbers of women
demanding their right to abortion. As this law was being debated, women
from across Texas marched and sat in at the state capitol to demand
their rights. Women came together who had fought for the right to
abortion in the streets that had brought about the Roe v. Wade decision
in 1973, with younger women who had never before imagined a time when
abortion was illegal and a safe abortion was not an option.
Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the majority, made clear that these
laws are unconstitutional: “Unnecessary health regulations that have the
purpose or effect of presenting a substantial obstacle to a woman
seeking an abortion impose an undue burden on the right to an abortion.”
As to the admitting privileges provision, Breyer said there was
“nothing” in the record of the case to show that the requirement
advanced the interest of protecting women’s health. “Each [requirement]
places a substantial obstacle in the path of women seeking a
previability abortion, each constitutes an undue burden on abortion
access, and each violates the Federal Constitution”.
It was interesting that even Justice Anthony Kennedy saw this law as
unconstitutional. Kennedy has been involved in 12 cases addressing
abortion restrictions. In those 12 cases, he has voted on whether 21
different abortion restrictions could take effect. In all instances
except one, he has always allowed restrictions on abortions.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg concurred with the opinion written by
Justice Beyer and added a short but clear statement that was aimed at
state legislatures around the country telling them that any cases
restricting access to abortion violated Roe v. Wade and would be struck
down: “Abortions are statistically safer than many simpler medical
procedures, including tonsillectomies, colonoscopies, in-office dental
surgery and childbirth—but Texas does not subject those procedures to
the same onerous requirements. Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers
laws like HB.2 that do little or nothing for health, but rather strew
impediments to abortion, cannot survive judicial inspection.”
It was interesting to note that a few hours after the decision, Hillary
Clinton and Elizabeth Warren were appearing together at a large rally in
Cincinnati. It was billed as a major speech in which the two women were
campaigning together for the first time. Both speeches were telecast in
full on MSNBC, and after it was over, veteran journalist Andrea Mitchell
seemed shocked that not one word had been uttered by either woman about
the Supreme Court’s abortion decision. Later, Mitchell reported that she
was told that the Clinton campaign didn’t think Cincinnati would
necessarily be that receptive to the issue.
There was another victory for women at the Supreme Court today. This was
a win for two million home-care workers. Two and a half years ago, the
Labor Department finalized a rule requiring that home-care workers be
paid at least the federal minimum wage for all hours worked as well as
overtime pay when they work more than 40 hours in a week. It was stopped
by a lawsuit that was filed by the International Franchise Association
and the home-care industry.
The Supreme Court refused to hear the case, so the Labor Department rule
will go into effect. The ongoing union organizing of home-care workers
in both the public and private sector and their demand for respect and
dignity, along with their alliance with fast-food workers in the Fight
For 15, has given them the visibility and power to influence the U.S.
Supreme Court. Congratulations!
Share this:
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
14Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)14
Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
June 27, 2016 in Women's Liberation. Tags: abortion, reproductive
rights, Supreme Court, women
Related posts
Defend reproductive justice for women!
Court blocks Texas anti-abortion law
Planned Parenthood cleared of false charges
Post navigation
← Interview with Socialist Action’s presidential candidate, Jeff Mackler
Vote Socialist Action!
Jeff Mackler for President and Karen Schraufnagel for Vice President
More information:
Newspaper Archives
Newspaper Archives Select Month June 2016 (13) May 2016 (9) April
2016 (12) March 2016 (14) February 2016 (8) January 2016 (11)
December 2015 (11) November 2015 (9) October 2015 (8) September 2015
(10) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May 2015 (10) April
2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January 2015 (10)
December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9) September
2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10) May 2014
(11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11) January 2014
(11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013 (17)
September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013 (15)
May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013 (10)
January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October 2012
(19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June 2012
(3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012 (19)
January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October 2011
(14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June 2011
(19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February 2011
(16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1) October
2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7) June 2010
(2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (3)
January 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5) October 2009
(16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (2)
May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February 2009 (9)
January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8) October 2008
(16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008 (12) June 2008
(3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14) February 2008 (11)
January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (1) July 2007 (1)
June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1) February 2007 (3)
December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006 (13) September
2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (18) June 2006 (7) May 2006
(14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (5) January 2006
(2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October 2005 (13) September
2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005 (16) May 2005
(16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005 (19) January 2005
(15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17) October 2002 (19) September
2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002 (21) April 2002
(21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15) December 2001 (17) October
2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June 2001 (18) October
2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August 2000 (19) July 2000 (16) June
2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000 (22) March 2000 (28) February
2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December 1999 (20) November 1999 (26)
October 1999 (25) September 1999 (18) August 1999 (40) July 1999
(38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27) April 1999 (25) March 1999 (26)
February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24) July 1998 (12)
Search
Get Involved
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Join Socialist Action
View socialistactionusa’s profile on Facebook
View SocialistActUS’s profile on Twitter
View SocialistActionCT’s profile on YouTube
Subscribe to Our Newspaper
Blog at WordPress.com. The Expound Theme.
