So Mostafa, what if, instead of a man taking 4 wives, a woman took 4
husbands? Would you have a religious issue regarding this?
And I wonder why our God has no problem with older men taking young
girls as wives. Say a 60 year old man marrying a 13 year old girl.
But we see no examples of 60 year old women taking teenage boys as
husbands.
Carl Jarvis
On 5/12/19, Roger Loran Bailey <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So what would you have to say about it if a woman wanted four husbands?
---
David Hume
“ In our reasonings concerning matter of fact, there are all imaginable
degrees of assurance, from the highest certainty to the lowest species of
moral evidence. A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the
evidence. ”
― David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
On 5/12/2019 2:06 PM, Mostafa Almahdy wrote:
Hello. If you live in the west, what are the incomparably two capital
crimes? Before I answer this, let me clarify what do we exactly mean
when we say the west. Generically, it's the geographical region of
Europe, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand post to their colonised era by
Britain and North America. That's the west. Ordinarily, capital crimes
worldwide are classified as to their rate and impact. So for instance,
platted murder is a major felony and so burglary. That's immensely
outlawed cosmically. But as to the western world, the matter is
slightly different. There are two crimes, you'll be really in trouble
if you commit neither of them therein. First, Antisemitism. If you
wish to be constantly pestered, go ahead and just attempt to be a bit
skeptic of the Holocaust or its alleged chronicle. Even the number six
million, if you say there were perhaps five million and nine thousand
ninety nine, you'll be emphatically plagued. You'll be labeled as
Antisemitic at the slightest. Possibly, you may lose your job and even
friends if you oppugn the Holocaust's alleged account. Do you want to
be recognised in the west? Well, just be nice to Jews and speak
fervently of them and exhibit counterfeit sympathy with the Holocaust
even if you are not so convinced of its alleged
account. While wittingly, Jews aren't the only semitic race in the
Middle East, they're the only ones for western Christians and
Atheists. Despite the fact that there other semite nations in the
region, you'll be called antisemitic if you criticise Jews only.
Alright, so, what is the second unbearable crime in the west? Well, as
you know, western democracy is said to be the eminent guardian of
minorities. Whether they are of ethnic, geopolitical or sexual
orientation, law in western countries protects them from
discrimination. Nevertheless, you'll actually be in tremendous trouble
if you express negative opinion of homophiles. There is even a term
for this. It isn't so nice though. You'll be called a homophobe. This
is someone who has intense dislike of homosexuals. You might be in
some instances, subjected to penalty by law if you expressed your
aversion of homoeroticism in public. Be that as it may, if someone
expresses disparagement of Muslim veil, he'll scarcely be called
Islamophobe. If someone desecrates the Koran, he'll barely be called a
bigot. I have seen this sort of deliberate secernment exercised on
multiple occasions in the west. Why is this intended privilege of
minorities over others in western culture? I destine to expose western
kidders with this piece. In the subsequent instance, I will show you,
how western democracy is notoriously invidious. Now, GLBT rights are
defended and legally guarded in the States and beyond. To those who
might be not so familiar with the term, its an acronym that generally
refers to Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender and Transsexual. These
people, despite their irregular sexual orientation, are wholly
protected by federal authority. People justify the phenomenon of
homosexuality as genetically motivated. Well, is this claim genuine?
Well, if so, what is wrong then? if we say, that someone is
genetically polygamous, and that his wives have no problem with this.
Polygamy is outlawed in the States while homosexuality is absolutely
legal in all fifty States. Nonetheless, homosexual lobbies strongly
advocate against Conversion therapy therein. What is this? It is the
practice of attempting to change an individual's sexual orientation
from homosexual or bisexual to heterosexual. They rely on
psychological or spiritual interventions. Pro homosexuals in the west
call this pseudoscientific. Basically, it is the practice based on
theories and methods erroneously regarded as scientific. We now have
the right to ask, and we should ask, is the western culture really
fair regarding equal rights of embracement? I consider the alleged
western democracy is nothing but of mythical inception. Even
Christians, have allowed same sex relationships. But, if someone felt
he needs to marry more than one wife up to four based on Islamic
consent while his women agree, he is criticised with the cruddiest of
terms. Well, if someone in the States was married and has been
cheating on his spouse. His girlfriend got pregnant and the guy
dismissed the baby. She has no one to care for her and the child she
holds. Thence, she must go out, work hard to get food for herself and
the poorly desolated child. She has no legal rights, as to the fact
that her relationship wasn't licitly documented. Honestly, social life
in the west is awfully miserable. So that's why, many people out there
seek refuge with alcohol and other addictions to distract themselves
from the daily psychopathies they are relentlessly subjected to. It is
quite obvious now, how western culture is explicitly discriminatory.
They are good at defending gay rights. They would sue people who
harass their coworkers based on sexual orientation. But, if someone
felt the necessity to have more than one spouse and they mutually
agree, the case has to be politicised. The west practices intellectual
terrorism upon us. Nothing is right but what he sees as right. What is
that called? Isn't that the practical definition of double standard? I
believe I have summoned the matter thoroughly, as to why western
democracy is radically disingenuous.
