Mostafa, if you want to criticize Israel there is plenty to criticize it
about. And if you would just stick to that you even have some good
points. But when you surround it with all of this religious preaching
your points are lost. You just create hostility toward yourself. Why do
you want to cause people to detest you by bashing them over the heads
with religion? It really makes you an unpleasant person.
________________________________________________
Jules Verne
“ Reality provides us with facts so romantic that imagination itself could add
nothing to them. ”
― Jules Verne
On 1/17/2019 7:55 PM, Mostafa Almahdy wrote:
Muslims hold one stiff belief in Allah’s prophets. We equally respect
and love them. We tend to not make distinction among them. In our
tradition, we incessantly decline tales in the Bible that are not
parentally guided. We discard a story about Noah peace be upon him
being inebriated. We despise a biblical story portraying Lot peace be
upon him committing incest with his daughters to preserve his lineage.
We despise another story that portrays David peace be upon him as
perfidious, plotter and murderer. We also despise relating a story
portraying Solomon peace be upon him committing paganism because he
was beguiled with one of his concubines. Despite the fact that it
blasphemously defames one of Allah’s prominent prophets, why would
someone with Solomon’s predominant monarchy give in to one woman? What
for? It is nonsensical and irreverent. The Koran relates the best of
stories about prophets. In Islam, prophets are infallible of
committing capital offences. They won’t commit deadly sins. However,
in terrestrial affairs, they may possibly opt the less prioritised.
This is rationally relevant to their human factor. They are ordinary
men whom Allah chose to blessedly receive His divine revelation.
Prophets of Allah are pious, truthful, virtuous, mighty, reputed and
imenently gracious. If someone was opted to represent your business
and he gravely manipulated it, wouldn’t that sequentially jeopardise
your competency to choose adequate deputy? As Muslims, we don’t
disesteem Allah’s prophets to deify Jesus. Christians have
unambiguously prefaced this concept. Their portrayal of Christ is
intemperately sacrilegious to the Providential being. In Islam, we
equally honour all Allah’s prophets and messengers. We honour Noah,
Job, Lot, Abraham, Isaac, Ishmael, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, David,
Solomon, Zechariah, John, Jesus and Muhammad peace and blessings be
upon them. In Islam, we never tolerate portraying any of those noble
prophets and messengers in defamatory caricature. We never impute
inappropriate affairs to them. Islam is eminently prestigious than
Christianity when it comes to prophets. In Christian theology, they
are portrayed as patriarchs. Who is a patriarch? Well theologically, a
patriarch is any of the early biblical characters regarded as fathers
of the human race. This is why their stories are not highly esteemed
in the Bible. Islam holds a totally different view about prophets.
What is a prophet in Islam? A prophet in Islam is someone that Allah
chose to deliver His divine sentiment to people. This chosen man has
major characteristics. First, he doesn’t commit deadly sins.
Consequently, he never associates someone with Allah glory be to Him.
Second, his moral stance is of the best among people. He doesn’t lie,
he doesn’t cheat nor maltreat. Christians are obsessed with viciously
aspersing prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him). Be that
as it may, he is the noblest of mankind. In terms of this absurd
comparison which many evangelists have unfairly made between Jesus
and Muhammad peace and blessings be upon them, I wonder what Jesus
will think of those who viciously asperse prophet Muhammad who’s
Jesus’s fellow in prophethood with paedophilia? I am fine with
repeating this offensive expression. It has nothing to do with
Muhammad’s honourable and prophetic character, peace and blessings be
upon him. It just unveils how distasteful and bizarre their
assumptions are. In response to that, we honour and respect Jesus and
Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon them. We never disparaged nor
neglected any of Allah’s prophets. Christians inadvertently speak
unfavourably of Ishmael. They consider him pariah. Prophet Muhammad
(peace and blessings be upon him) comes from Ishmaelite descent. This
is why early Jews of Medina rejected the prophetic message. It has
much to do with racial disparity. They thought a prophet from
different origin is disgraceful to their fallaciously proclaimed
ethnic superiority. Christians are typically dominated with Jewish
influence. Jews determined to detestably despise Ishmaelite lineage
and thence, Christians precisely imitated them. It basically works
like this, Jews rule, Christians follow. Who is Ishmaelite? He is a
descendant of prophet Ishmael peace be upon him. Ishmael peace be upon
him is the traditional ancestor of Arabs whom from prophet Muhammad
comes. Despite the fact that Jews are the ones until today who speak
despicably of Jesus and his mother, Christians fully endorse them in
whatever they do. Muslims, however, have in their most sacred text one
chapter that is wholly named after Jesus’s mother. It is called
chapter of Mary. It is numbered the nineteenth chapter in a regular
Koranic index. It talks about Zechariah and his prayer to his Lord in
seclusion to grant him a notable heir. Allah blessed him with prophet
John whom Christians call the Baptist. Despite his spouse being
barren, Allah blessed them with a righteous son. The chapter also
relates Mary’s celibacy and the Nativity tale. It is worthy of
thorough reflection. In this divine text, Allah revealed verses that
are intended to utterly vindicate Mary the virtuous from what Jews
have ingloriously denigrated her with. If she was married to someone
called Joseph, how could she still be virgin then? In our version of
the story, she indeed wasn’t married to anyone. I urge you to check
the reference I just cited and then decide, which one is appropriate?
I call you to enthusiastically embrace the providential covenant. I am
not interested in debates. I am just inviting you to Islam. This is
what we call Dawah, which is missionary activism to Islam. I
proselytise to my faith with remarkable evidence. I convey this
assertion to flamboyant laity. You have deliberately intended to
enrage Muslim offence. Christian press and broadcast across the States
commissioned disparaging portraiture of major Islamic symbols.
However, they could not criticise, examine or just oppugn Holocaust
controversial chronicle even by happenstance. They are enormously
manipulated with Jewish ascendency. Therefore, Christian viewpoint of
prophethood is essentially based on Judaic notion. It is consistent to
fathom then, that despite Jewish hostility of Jesus and his mother,
Christians collaborate and coordinate with them for politically
motivated convictions. Thereof, today's modern Protestants are
savagely colluded with Zionists. America's economy is war based.
Christian Zionists by whatever manner are unsightedly driven by Jews
to enter into wars that are only beneficial to Israel. Christians are
suppose to love their enemy and pray for him. Nevertheless, the
today's majority of evangelists and the southerners of them in
particular are convinced to put the interest of Israel on the top.
Even if this contradicts with the basic teachings of Jesus, they are
willing to go for it. Rationally, there is no room for both. To
Christian Zionists, Israel is God's chosen race. Despite the fact that
Israel commits enormously awful atrocities on a daily basis, it is yet
seconded and broadly endorsed among alleged gospelers. We shall
therefore look into the moral implication of this notoriously
racialist temperament. Britain aided illicitly migrated Jews to settle
in Palestine. Critique of this crucial era is often dismissed in major
western historical publications. Today's contemporary Evangelicalism
is wholly held accountable of radically emerging the Israeli
Palestinian conflict. With US tax revenue, Israel's military base and
sophisticated artillery are illimitably subsidised. Israel ruthlessly
murders defenceless women and children everyday. Israel's oppressive
soldiery utilises US brought missiles to inhumanely sabotage
innocently civilian Palestinians. I thence must ask, what for are we
impeached of perpetrating terror? If you approve funding Israel's
military to subdue us, why are we despised for implementing combative
Jihad to justly defy transgressors? This query must be tackled plainly
and thoroughly. Some biblical quotes are used to justify the deadly
capital offences Israel commits on a virtually periodical basis.
Palestinians are constantly immobilised with Israeli air strikes and
systematically based ethnic cleansing that are globally witnessed.
Consequently, they're somewhat coerced to engage in a wide range of
insurgences. They attempt to relatively withstand their oppressor.
Gaza Strip is literally a prison. It has been built and funded with
regular US tax revenue. The two are indivisible, Israel military and
US cash. With this in mind, aren't you purposely funding assailants to
go farther with their aggression? So, if you are targeted by Muslims
for standing by oppression on plenty of occasions, why do you scold
them and fallaciously indict them of callous terror? If I sought to
justly execute Donald Trump for his denotative belligerence, would I
be remonstrated for this? I openly seek to fend for justice. Americans
ostensibly are haters of peace process. The two parties are
irreconcilable. I seek to flawlessly withdraw transgressive US
veterans and anathemised military personnel from our whole region. I
destine to exercise my courage to do so. I wholeheartedly pray to
Allah to bless me with engaging in a combative Jihad to particularly
conquer the damnable Pentagon. We won't be at US's alleged mercy. It
wholly lacks the latter. Thus far, we wouldn't be fooled, we just
couldn't. Mustafa from Cairo Egypt