https://socialistworker.org/2018/05/08/our-socialism-is-international
Our socialism is international
Opposition to nationalism and support for struggles for freedom are
bedrock principles.
May 8, 2018
Marching against the bombing of Afghanistan in San Francisco in 2001
(Josh On | SW)
Marching against the bombing of Afghanistan in San Francisco in 2001
(Josh On | SW)
ONE OF the most positive political developments in years has been the
emergence of a new generation of socialists in the U.S.
Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination
didn't shy away from the s-word, and he became the most popular
political leader in the country. According to a Gallup poll, a majority
of people between 18 and 29 say that they have favorable views of socialism.
Most exciting of all is that socialist organizations--like the
International Socialist Organization, which publishes Socialist Worker,
the Democratic Socialists of America and others--are thriving and growing.
This is a breath of fresh air. But we know from the experiences of the
past that the political character of this radicalization isn't a given.
There are different ideas and traditions of socialism, and which of them
comes to represent the politics of socialism to a new generation will
depend on political discussion and debate--and on the testing of our
ideas in struggle.
The renewed popularity of socialism is no doubt shaped by the
astronomical wealth inequality of U.S. society--that was the central
theme of the Sanders campaign. Struggles like Black Lives Matter,
Standing Rock and #MeToo have also made opposition to oppression a part
of the worldview of a new generation of radicals.
We want to make case in this article that internationalism and
opposition to imperialism must likewise be at the center of the fight
for socialism.
The questions of war and empire are forced on the left today by Donald
Trump's reactionary and militaristic presidency, as he seems to invite
conflict and violence with every new tweet. But internationalism was
central to the socialist tradition long before Trump--back to when Karl
Marx and Frederick Engels wrote: "Workers of all countries, unite!"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THE CASE for an internationalist socialism starts from the fact that
capitalism--the dog-eat-dog competitive system that breeds poverty and
oppression and violence--is divided into national states whose ruling
classes compete for dominance. The outcome of this global rat race is
that the world is divided into an order where some states are more
powerful, and others are less powerful and subjugated.
One of the most effective ideological tools of the ruling class is to
encourage the belief that all of us living within an arbitrarily drawn
national boundary--and, indeed, many national borders originated as
nothing more than lines drawn on a map--have common interests against
people living within a different arbitrarily drawn national boundary.
The conflict comes in different forms. There's the economic: Donald
Trump insists that Americans are getting a raw deal because the people
of China, rulers and workers alike, are taking unfair advantage.
We're taught that nations are united by a common culture, a common
language, common national traits--though none of that holds up when you
stop to think about it.
The most devastating conflicts of all are military--when rival
governments declare war, and working people pay the price. As the
American socialist Eugene Debs famously said: "The master class has
always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the
battles. The master class has had all to gain and nothing to lose, while
the subject class has had nothing to gain and all to lose--especially
their lives."
Internationalism starts from the opposing principle to capitalism: that
the working people of every country--countries at war, countries that
are economic rivals, countries whose populations differ in any number of
ways--have interests in common with each other, not with their rulers.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THIS IDEA was so important to Marx and Engels that they considered it
one of the main features that distinguished socialists from all other
radical parties. "In the national struggles of the proletarians of the
different countries," they wrote in the Communist Manifesto, socialists
"point out and bring to the front the common interests of the entire
proletariat, independently of all nationality."
Marx and Engels were participants in the revolutionary wave that swept
across Europe in 1848, disregarding every border--and they later banded
together with other revolutionaries to form the International
Workingman's Association, also known as the First International.
Other socialists following in the Marxist tradition are known, perhaps
above all else, for their commitment to internationalism.
During the First World War, when all the political parties of
Europe--including the socialist parties of the time--supported "their"
governments in going to war, revolutionaries such as Vladimir Lenin and
Leon Trotsky in Russia and Rosa Luxemburg and Clara Zetkin in Germany
resisted the war in the name of internationalism.
They were joined by socialists in the U.S. In January 1916, Helen
Keller, speaking as a member of the Industrial Workers of the World at
Carnegie Hall in New York City, called on workers to "strike against all
ordinances and laws and institutions that continue the slaughter of
peace and the butcheries of war. Strike against war, for without you no
battles can be fought."
In the 1960s, the civil rights activists who became revolutionaries
declared their commitment to an international struggle.
In her autobiography, Black Power revolutionary Assata Shakur described
coming to an awareness of the Vietnamese and Puerto Rican struggles for
freedom: "Once you understand something about the history of a people,
their heroes, their hardships and their sacrifices, it's easier to
struggle with them, to support their struggle."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
IF THERE was any doubt that imperial arrogance, nationalism and racism
are central to the way that the U.S. ruling class rules, Donald Trump
has settled the matter.
But it's easy to oppose Trump as a warmonger. What the left needs to
reckon with is that both the Republican and Democratic Parties are
committed to the project of maintaining U.S. dominance over the world
order of nations--as are other ruling institutions, such as the
corporate media and top universities.
Individuals among this elite--members of Congress, the editorial boards
of major news outlets, think-tank fellows--may disagree on the tactics
and strategies of what the U.S. does abroad.
But one matter isn't in question: the assumption that the U.S. should be
"number one," that it is "the world's greatest democracy," and that it
therefore has the right to shape the affairs of people around the
world--whether through invasions and air strikes, or diplomacy and
negotiation, or humanitarian aid (with strings attached).
What does it mean to be a socialist internationalist in the U.S. today?
It means resisting the pull of nationalism that pervades political and
social life, even among those who see themselves as liberal and even
radical.
It means recognizing that the U.S. became a nation through an attack on,
displacement of and colonization of existing nations that were here
first--and the primary source of wealth in the infancy of the "world's
greatest democracy" was one of history's most horrific crimes: slavery.
It means recognizing and opposing U.S. subjugation of outright colonies,
such as Puerto Rico, and formally independent nations that it dominates
in America's "backyard."
It means opposing all the means by which the U.S. empire shapes the
political affairs and societies of other countries--whether military
operations, the presence of hundreds of military bases and thousands of
troops the world over, and trade deals and economic agreements. It means
standing with Palestine, which is oppressed by U.S.-backed Israeli
apartheid.
And, crucially, it means recognizing that people in all of these places
have always challenged the power of the U.S. empire, whether wielded
directly or in alliance with other tyrannies around the world--and that
internationalists always stand with the resisters.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FIFTY YEARS ago, at the high point of the last great social
radicalization in 1968, there was a common sense among revolutionaries
around the world that the struggle for socialism was international.
There were radical struggles all over the globe--in France, in Vietnam,
in Mexico, in Czechoslovakia, in the U.S. and countless other
places--and they influenced, inspired and were in solidarity with each
other. To be a socialist in the U.S. meant to oppose the power of the
American empire and support revolutionary struggles for justice around
the world.
Things are different in 2018. To start with, Bernie Sanders--the
best-known socialist in the U.S., thanks to his unapologetic left-wing
message against corporate greed and the corruption of the political
system--is no opponent of the U.S. empire.
From the aftermath of Trump's victory through to this year, Sanders has
maintained that "I and other progressives are prepared to work with him"
when it comes to economic nationalist policies that punish China for
supposedly unfair trade practices and that scapegoat "foreign
competition" for the deteriorating living standards in the U.S.
In reality, the U.S. has no business lecturing any country about unfair
trade after rigging the world system in its favor since the end of the
Second World War. And blaming "foreign competition" for the plight of
U.S. workers leaves Corporate America--which is demonstrably more
responsible for layoffs and low wages--off the hook.
Meanwhile, Sanders may denounce Trump's saber-rattling and xenophobia,
but he, like any number of liberal political figures, accepts the
imperialist mindset that the U.S. must dominate the world, along with
its alliances with tyrannies like Israel and Saudi Arabia. In his home
state of Vermont, Sanders is notorious among left activists for having
unconditionally backed the basing of the U.S. military's boondoggle F-35
bomber at Burlington's airport.
The left shouldn't have any tolerance for such backward views on foreign
policy--if for no other reason than that nationalism is the cutting edge
of the Trumpian assault on democracy and freedom, and there can be no
compromise with that.
Trump has built a right-wing base by deflecting justified bitterness
among working-class people away from exploitative corporations and the
politicians who work for them, and toward immigrants and "enemies"
abroad. This is the justification for a new round of militarizing the
border and an aggressive imperialist posture.
Socialists can't concede an inch to the American elite and their
nationalism, in whatever form it comes. Any investment that working
class people make in the U.S. state, its borders and its flag must be
paid for by accepting common ground with the rulers who are primarily
responsible for their misery.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THERE IS another tragic departure from internationalism on the U.S. left
today.
Among those who continue to make opposition to U.S. imperialism a
principle, there are currents and whole organizations that use their
"opposition" as an excuse to align themselves with tyranny and rival
empires.
The prime example here is Syria. A whole section of the U.S. left is
supporting the murderous regime of Bashar al-Assad and its international
backers in Russia and Iran, on the grounds that they are formally, if
not practically, opposed to the U.S.--even when this means accepting
mass murder and repression that they would revile coming from the U.S.
or its allies.
Socialism has no meaning if, in the name of anti-imperialism, it
tolerates dictatorship and a genocidal civil war to crush a
pro-democracy uprising.
Our vision is of a struggle of the working class and oppressed peoples
themselves to remake the world. That struggle from below exists in every
corner of the world, and it is crucial for the left to be in solidarity
with each struggle for freedom.
As socialists in the U.S., the world's most powerful empire, our main
enemy is "at home." But any ruling force in the world that enforces
oppression and exploitation is also our enemy--and those struggling for
freedom are our comrades.
Our internationalism is consistent: We oppose the imposition of U.S.
imperial power and support those genuinely fighting against it, not only
for the sake of those struggles of the oppressed, but because of the
importance of building a united working-class movement here--one that
champions all struggles against oppression and for freedom.
Print
E-mail
Share
close
Facebook logo
Twitter logo
StumbleUpon logo
Digg logo
del.icio.us logo
Diigo logo
Furl logo
Google logo
identi.ca logo
LinkedIn logo
MySpace logo
Newskicks logo
Newsvine logo
Ping This! logo
Reddit logo
Technorati logo
Tumblr logo
Yahoo logo
Respond
.
Main menu
Home
Recent
E-mail alerts
RSS
Donate
International Socialist Org.
About Us
Contact us
..
Join us at Socialism 2018!
Socialism 2018 | Chicago | July 5-8
View at full size
Related articles
◾Why workers have the power to change society
◾Why you need to be at Socialism 2018
◾Is Marxism only about exploitation?
◾Does revolution still matter for the left?
◾Why they still need their big lies about socialism
Recent articles
5/11
5/10
5/9
5/8
5/7
5/4
Friday, May 11th
◾#RedForEd versus the UFT-Cuomo blues
◾The shape of resistance in Brazil
E-mail alerts
Get e-mail alerts from SocialistWorker.org
Subscribe
Blogs
Critical reading
◾Happy birthday Karl Marx!
◾What's wrong with Syria conspiracy theories
◾Trump's trade wars
◾Capitalism vs. the climate
◾Corbyn closing the gap in the UK election
BetterOffRedPod.com
.
.
International Socialist Review | ISReview.org
.
Blank-ad-space.gif
.
.
SocialistWorker.org
Recent
E-mail Alerts
RSS
Donate
International Socialist Org.
Who We Are
Where We Stand
Contact Us
War/Antiwar
Economy
National
International
Opinion
History/Traditions
Labor
Activist News
Readers' Views
Books/Entertainment
Published by the International Socialist Organization