Boardman writes: "If the President had any intention of honoring anything
relating to the sacred lands of Native Americans, he would not be planning
to 'let it play out for several more weeks.' Sacred lands have already been
destroyed. Sacred lands are being destroyed no, not only by the pipeline
construction but also by the massive militarized police response to
nonviolent protest."
Police use pepper spray against protesters trying to cross a stream near an
oil pipeline construction site near Standing Rock Indian Reservation, north
of Cannon Ball, North Dakota, November 2, 2016. (photo: Jason
Patinkin/Reuters)
Obama Is Pathetic on Human Rights in North Dakota
By William Boardman, Reader Supported News
04 November 16
We're monitoring this closely. And, you know, I think, as a general rule, my
view is that there is a way for us to accommodate sacred lands of Native
Americans. And I think that right now the Army Corps is examining whether
there are ways to reroute this pipeline in a way.. So-so, we're going to let
it play out for several more weeks and determine whether or not this can be
resolved in a way that I think is properly attentive to the traditions of
the first Americans..
- President Obama on the Now This News website, November 1, 2016
Isn't that sweet? The President gave lip service to "the traditions of the
first Americans." He didn't mention treaties between sovereign nations, of
course, because he's not about to break with the traditions of the second
Americans: that such treaties are only a means to a genocidal end and aren't
to be taken seriously by the United States of exceptional, manifestly
destined Americans whenever such treaties interfere with what the US wants.
That's what "properly attentive" means historically. Freely translated,
"properly attentive" means "make a show of peace talk, them roll over them
with whatever force necessary after it's too late to affect the election."
The legal mind is nothing if not properly attentive to elegant turns of
phrase in its unyielding hypocrisy.
If the President had any intention of honoring anything relating to the
sacred lands of Native Americans, he would not be planning to "let it play
out for several more weeks." Sacred lands have already been destroyed.
Sacred lands are being destroyed no, not only by the pipeline construction
but also by the massive militarized police response to nonviolent protest.
Letting it play out for several more weeks only opens the door to the
destruction of more - even all - of the sacred lands in the path of this
lethal-to-the-planet pipeline.
What is happening, what has been happening for months in North Dakota, is a
travesty - of justice, of common human decency, of the rule of law and
standards of international law. And our president is on the wrong side of
all of it, just barely responding in his docile, passive, articulate
evasiveness.
"We're monitoring this closely," says the President
If the President is monitoring this closely and remains willing to let it
play out for several more weeks, that's a pretty clear signal that he has no
serious problem with the creation of police state conditions in North
Dakota. Besides an unknown number of private security forces working for
Energy Transfer Partners (the pipeline sponsor), there are law enforcement
officers from at least seven states that have cost about $10 million so far.
That seems a ridiculously high price to pay to contain peaceful protest. And
it's an even more ridiculous price for taxpayers to shell out to protect
private profits.
If the President is monitoring this closely without responding, that is a
tacit admission that he has no serious problem with any of the egregious
behavior so far by official and quasi-official paramilitaries and their
wide-ranging mistreatment (apparently including criminal assault) of
American citizens. In particular, he has allowed and continues to allow
himself to be seen as approving:
. Unlicensed, apparently untrained private security forces using dogs
to bloody peaceful protesters (who call themselves water protectors).
. State officials arresting and over-charging journalists for
committing journalism.
. A local sheriff inflaming the public with false reports of "pipe
bombs," when what he had actually heard was talk of "peace pipes."
. Law officers shooting nonviolent water protectors in the back and
front with rubber bullets.
. State officials housing arrestees in dog cages and conditions that
violate international law against torturing prisoners.
. Law officers on the riverbank using mace and pepper spray against
nonviolent water protectors standing in the water.
. Official surveillance helicopters flying low to panic horses.
. Official surveillance helicopters mysteriously going off duty just
before "persons unknown" start a prairie fire (with such ineptitude that the
wind blows it away from the Standing Rock Sioux gathering ground).
. Apparent contempt of court by Energy Transfer Partners, who sent its
bulldozers to destroy a burial ground that, once destroyed, could no longer
be a reason for a federal court to rule against the pipeline. Desecration is
not a criminal act, apparently, when you have a government permit for it,
even when that permit is under litigation.
That's a lot of official abuse to tolerate, even for a president, and that's
just a sampling of the police state techniques being tested in Middle
America these days.
"And I think that right now the Army Corps is examining whether there are
ways to reroute this pipeline in a way ."
The President paused there, leaving the thought unfinished. The pipeline has
already been re-routed, away from the state capital city of Bismarck after
residents there expressed fear that the pipeline threatened their water
supply. Now the pipeline threatens the water supply of the Standing Rock
Sioux (and thousands of others), but that is more acceptable to the American
power structure. The President has expressed no dismay at the idea that a
pipeline rupture along the Missouri River would devastate huge numbers of
"the first Americans," who have no other source of water. As one water
protector put it: "If it were to be contaminated,. it would be a death
sentence."
Why does the President think rerouting a climate-hostile pipeline is any
kind of an answer to anything other than protecting the speculative bets of
Energy Transfer Partners? If he were to consider this pipeline (any new
pipeline) in terms of its impact on global climate values, this would be a
no-brainer: no more pipelines. This is the Army Corps of Engineers we're
talking about - the Army - and the President is the commander in chief who
has no difficulty blowing up wedding parties and funerals with drones in
some imaginary defense of national security. Why does he have such
reluctance to protect planetary security? Why does he not just order the
Army Corp of Engineers to go back to square one and re-do this process which
was fast-tracked in the first place, for reasons that remain murky, and with
the exclusion of interested parties with legal standing. But President
Obama, on full salary as he campaigns for Hillary Clinton, shows no
inclination to do any of this well or right. He's apparently much more
confortable with false equivalencies and blaming the victims (also on Now
This News):
Yeah, I mean, it's a challenging situation. I think that my general rule
when I talk to governors and state and local officials, whenever they're
dealing with protests, including, for example, during the Black Lives
Matters protests, is there is an obligation for protesters to be peaceful,
and there's an obligation for authorities to show restraint. And, you know,
I want to make sure that as everybody is exercising their constitutional
rights to be heard, that both sides are refraining from situations that
might result in people being hurt.
For someone supposedly monitoring this closely, the President might be
expected to know that people have already been hurt and most if not all of
those hurt were nonviolent, peaceful protestors set upon by dogs and
assaulted by rubber bullets, sound cannons, and chemical weapons. What
fundamental, callous irrationality prompts this president to bring in Black
Lives Matter? That is strange beyond comprehension. But perhaps it shines a
light on that dark place in his soul that allowed him to react with almost
no help or pity for the people of Flint, poisoned by their own governments,
including the one President Obama is supposed to lead.
________________________________________
William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV,
print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont
judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination
from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Police use pepper spray against protesters trying to cross a stream near an
oil pipeline construction site near Standing Rock Indian Reservation, north
of Cannon Ball, North Dakota, November 2, 2016. (photo: Jason
Patinkin/Reuters)
http://readersupportednews.org/http://readersupportednews.org/
Obama Is Pathetic on Human Rights in North Dakota
By William Boardman, Reader Supported News
04 November 16
We're monitoring this closely. And, you know, I think, as a general rule, my
view is that there is a way for us to accommodate sacred lands of Native
Americans. And I think that right now the Army Corps is examining whether
there are ways to reroute this pipeline in a way.. So-so, we're going to let
it play out for several more weeks and determine whether or not this can be
resolved in a way that I think is properly attentive to the traditions of
the first Americans..
- President Obama on the Now This News website, November 1, 2016
sn't that sweet? The President gave lip service to "the traditions of the
first Americans." He didn't mention treaties between sovereign nations, of
course, because he's not about to break with the traditions of the second
Americans: that such treaties are only a means to a genocidal end and aren't
to be taken seriously by the United States of exceptional, manifestly
destined Americans whenever such treaties interfere with what the US wants.
That's what "properly attentive" means historically. Freely translated,
"properly attentive" means "make a show of peace talk, them roll over them
with whatever force necessary after it's too late to affect the election."
The legal mind is nothing if not properly attentive to elegant turns of
phrase in its unyielding hypocrisy.
If the President had any intention of honoring anything relating to the
sacred lands of Native Americans, he would not be planning to "let it play
out for several more weeks." Sacred lands have already been destroyed.
Sacred lands are being destroyed no, not only by the pipeline construction
but also by the massive militarized police response to nonviolent protest.
Letting it play out for several more weeks only opens the door to the
destruction of more - even all - of the sacred lands in the path of this
lethal-to-the-planet pipeline.
What is happening, what has been happening for months in North Dakota, is a
travesty - of justice, of common human decency, of the rule of law and
standards of international law. And our president is on the wrong side of
all of it, just barely responding in his docile, passive, articulate
evasiveness.
"We're monitoring this closely," says the President
If the President is monitoring this closely and remains willing to let it
play out for several more weeks, that's a pretty clear signal that he has no
serious problem with the creation of police state conditions in North
Dakota. Besides an unknown number of private security forces working for
Energy Transfer Partners (the pipeline sponsor), there are law enforcement
officers from at least seven states that have cost about $10 million so far.
That seems a ridiculously high price to pay to contain peaceful protest. And
it's an even more ridiculous price for taxpayers to shell out to protect
private profits.
If the President is monitoring this closely without responding, that is a
tacit admission that he has no serious problem with any of the egregious
behavior so far by official and quasi-official paramilitaries and their
wide-ranging mistreatment (apparently including criminal assault) of
American citizens. In particular, he has allowed and continues to allow
himself to be seen as approving:
. Unlicensed, apparently untrained private security forces using dogs
to bloody peaceful protesters (who call themselves water protectors).
. State officials arresting and over-charging journalists for
committing journalism.
. A local sheriff inflaming the public with false reports of "pipe
bombs," when what he had actually heard was talk of "peace pipes."
. Law officers shooting nonviolent water protectors in the back and
front with rubber bullets.
. State officials housing arrestees in dog cages and conditions that
violate international law against torturing prisoners.
. Law officers on the riverbank using mace and pepper spray against
nonviolent water protectors standing in the water.
. Official surveillance helicopters flying low to panic horses.
. Official surveillance helicopters mysteriously going off duty just
before "persons unknown" start a prairie fire (with such ineptitude that the
wind blows it away from the Standing Rock Sioux gathering ground).
. Apparent contempt of court by Energy Transfer Partners, who sent its
bulldozers to destroy a burial ground that, once destroyed, could no longer
be a reason for a federal court to rule against the pipeline. Desecration is
not a criminal act, apparently, when you have a government permit for it,
even when that permit is under litigation.
That's a lot of official abuse to tolerate, even for a president, and that's
just a sampling of the police state techniques being tested in Middle
America these days.
"And I think that right now the Army Corps is examining whether there are
ways to reroute this pipeline in a way ."
The President paused there, leaving the thought unfinished. The pipeline has
already been re-routed, away from the state capital city of Bismarck after
residents there expressed fear that the pipeline threatened their water
supply. Now the pipeline threatens the water supply of the Standing Rock
Sioux (and thousands of others), but that is more acceptable to the American
power structure. The President has expressed no dismay at the idea that a
pipeline rupture along the Missouri River would devastate huge numbers of
"the first Americans," who have no other source of water. As one water
protector put it: "If it were to be contaminated,. it would be a death
sentence."
Why does the President think rerouting a climate-hostile pipeline is any
kind of an answer to anything other than protecting the speculative bets of
Energy Transfer Partners? If he were to consider this pipeline (any new
pipeline) in terms of its impact on global climate values, this would be a
no-brainer: no more pipelines. This is the Army Corps of Engineers we're
talking about - the Army - and the President is the commander in chief who
has no difficulty blowing up wedding parties and funerals with drones in
some imaginary defense of national security. Why does he have such
reluctance to protect planetary security? Why does he not just order the
Army Corp of Engineers to go back to square one and re-do this process which
was fast-tracked in the first place, for reasons that remain murky, and with
the exclusion of interested parties with legal standing. But President
Obama, on full salary as he campaigns for Hillary Clinton, shows no
inclination to do any of this well or right. He's apparently much more
confortable with false equivalencies and blaming the victims (also on Now
This News):
Yeah, I mean, it's a challenging situation. I think that my general rule
when I talk to governors and state and local officials, whenever they're
dealing with protests, including, for example, during the Black Lives
Matters protests, is there is an obligation for protesters to be peaceful,
and there's an obligation for authorities to show restraint. And, you know,
I want to make sure that as everybody is exercising their constitutional
rights to be heard, that both sides are refraining from situations that
might result in people being hurt.
For someone supposedly monitoring this closely, the President might be
expected to know that people have already been hurt and most if not all of
those hurt were nonviolent, peaceful protestors set upon by dogs and
assaulted by rubber bullets, sound cannons, and chemical weapons. What
fundamental, callous irrationality prompts this president to bring in Black
Lives Matter? That is strange beyond comprehension. But perhaps it shines a
light on that dark place in his soul that allowed him to react with almost
no help or pity for the people of Flint, poisoned by their own governments,
including the one President Obama is supposed to lead.
William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV,
print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont
judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination
from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
