Truthdig
No, America, It Wasn't Russia: You Did This to Yourself
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/no_america_it_wasnt_russia_you_did_this_
to_yourself_20161210/
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to More7
Posted on Dec 10, 2016
By Juan Cole (http://www.truthdig.com/staff/juan_cole) / Informed Comment
(http://www.juancole.com/2016/12/america-russia-yourself.html)
President-elect Donald Trump. (Gage Skidmore / CC 2.0
(https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/8566717881/) )
The headlines scream, "Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help
Trump win White House
(https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-orders-review-
of-russian-hacking-during-presidential-campaign/2016/12/09/31d6b300-be2a-11e
6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html?tid=sm_tw) " and "Obama orders review of
Russian Hacking during Presidential campaign."
I don't doubt that the Russian Federation employs hackers and PR people to
influence public opinion and even election outcomes in other countries. So
does the United States of America. But I am skeptical that anything the
Russians did caused Donald Trump to be president.
It wasn't like Trump was a Manchurian Candidate, a stealth plant in the US
body politic who would only be operationalized once elected.
Trump was in plain view. He had all along been in plain view. His hatred for
uppity or "nasty" women, his racism, his prickliness, his narcissism, his
rich white boy arrogance and entitlement (apparently even to strange women
and other men's wives), his cronyism and his fundamental dishonesty were on
display 24/7 during some 18 months of the campaign, and it wasn't as though
he were an unknown quantity before that.
Americans voted for him anyway. Slightly more Americans voted for him than
for a respectable person like Mitt Romney. No Russians were holding a gun to
their heads. And they knew, or should have known, what they were getting.
By a "black swan" fluke, a few tens of thousands of the Trump voters were
distributed differently, state by state, than the McCain and Romney voters;
and in some key states like Michigan Sec. Clinton did not do as well as
Obama had, even if she was beloved in California and New York.
One of the cleverest things Trump said during the campaign was directed to
African-American voters, asking what they had to lose by challenging the
status quo and voting for him. It was a trick, of course, and they have
everything to lose, both because the Republican Party's economic policies
aim to help rich people at the expense of workers and most African-Americans
are working class, and because the GOP since Nixon has connived at
attracting a white racist constituency, and succeeded.
But despite the dishonesty of the quip (which did not fool African-Americans
one little bit), that kind of thinking appears to have been widespread. In
some states, as many as 14 percent of the white working class
(http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/12/the_myth_o
f_the_rust_belt_revolt.html) deserted the Democratic Party compared to the
previous two elections, and, worse, 21 percent of white working class voters
who used to vote for Obama just stayed home. They weren't being irrational.
Things have been bad for them and they haven't participated in the recovery
after 2008 the way the stock market has. Their death rates
(http://www.juancole.com/2016/11/rebelled-neoliberalism-literally.html)
have even increased.
Nor did any Russian hacking related to Wikileaks, if that is what happened,
prove decisive. Clinton's own polling people found the big turning point was
when she called Trump voters a "basket of deplorables." Americans don't like
being talked down to, and had already gotten rid of Romney for the same sin.
The spectacle of Clinton taking hundreds of thousands of dollars to give a
speech to the people who put them out of their homes in 2008-9 also turned
many of them off so that they stayed home, while another section of them
decided to take a chance on Trump. He will screw them over, but from their
point of view, they worried that she might have, as well. Trump was
promising to stop the hemorrhaging of jobs via protectionism, whereas
everyone understood that Sec. Clinton's first instinct was to do TPP and
send more jobs to Asia.
So it was Clinton's public persona and public positions that hurt her and
depressed Democratic turnout in places like Detroit and Flint, not anything
in Wikileaks (can anyone name even one newsworthy email?) Or on the other
hand it was neofascist disinformation campaigns like spirit cooking and
pizzagate. It wasn't anything as rational as a Putin sting.
No, America had its eyes wide open. The Republican Party, the usual 61
million, voted for Trump, despite his vulgar talk and vulgar style of life.
Since the GOP is mostly the party of Protestant whites plus about 40 million
Catholics who think they are white, nobody over there too much minded the
racism against minorities. There were some defections among the white
Protestant married women from the GOP (either stay-at-homes or
aisle-crossers) and there were some defections among the white working class
from the Democratic Party. But those two may well have just cancelled each
other out.
The GOP voted for a champion of the business classes, which Trump will be,
in spades. And that is what everyone should expect. There is nothing
surprising about it. The GOP wins nationally when it can add to its base of
small and large businesspeople and farmers and exurbanites, and Trump
managed to attract a few tens of thousands of other sorts of people in the
districts where it happened to matter.
Russia doesn't enter into it.
Noam Chomsky and Harry Belafonte Talk About Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump,
the KKK and More (Video)
Truthdiggers of the Week: The Water Protectors at Standing Rock
U.S. Becoming Increasingly Popular Destination for Rich Foreigners Avoiding
Corruption Charges
Donald Trump's Capricious Use of Power to Denigrate and Even Endanger His
Critics Must End
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
C 2016 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
Signup for Truthdig's newsletter
