Reich writes: "More evidence of pending Trump tyranny is his decision to
maintain an aggressive and unprecedented private security force - unlike all
modern presidents and presidents-elect who have entrusted their personal
security entirely to the Secret Service."
Robert Reich. (photo: Reuters)
Kings and Dictators Have Palace Guards. President's Don't.
By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Facebook Page
21 December 16
More evidence of pending Trump tyranny is his decision to maintain an
aggressive and unprecedented private security force -- unlike all modern
presidents and presidents-elect who have entrusted their personal security
entirely to the Secret Service.
Security officials warn that a private security force heightens risks for
protesters -- dozens of whom have already alleged racial profiling, undue
force or aggression at the hands of Trump's security, with at least 10
joining a trio of lawsuits now pending against Trump, his campaign or its
security.
Even after the election, Trump's private security force has removed
protesters - sometimes roughly - at many of his "Thank You Tour" rallies,
including about a dozen protesters during a rally in Grand Rapids on Dec. 9,
after Trump shouted "Get 'em out!"
Kings and dictators have palace guards. President's don't. At least not
until King Trump. Congress should make it illegal for a president to have a
private security force accountable to no one but himself.
What do you think?
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Robert Reich. (photo: Reuters)
https://www.facebook.com/RBReich/posts/1409944695684789https://www.facebook.
com/RBReich/posts/1409944695684789
Kings and Dictators Have Palace Guards. President's Don't.
By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Facebook Page
21 December 16
ore evidence of pending Trump tyranny is his decision to maintain an
aggressive and unprecedented private security force -- unlike all modern
presidents and presidents-elect who have entrusted their personal security
entirely to the Secret Service.
Security officials warn that a private security force heightens risks for
protesters -- dozens of whom have already alleged racial profiling, undue
force or aggression at the hands of Trump's security, with at least 10
joining a trio of lawsuits now pending against Trump, his campaign or its
security.
Even after the election, Trump's private security force has removed
protesters - sometimes roughly - at many of his "Thank You Tour" rallies,
including about a dozen protesters during a rally in Grand Rapids on Dec. 9,
after Trump shouted "Get 'em out!"
Kings and dictators have palace guards. President's don't. At least not
until King Trump. Congress should make it illegal for a president to have a
private security force accountable to no one but himself.
What do you think?
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
