Hello everyone, today I would like to assess a particular segment of
the fifth amendment. It is an amendment to the Constitution of the
United States. It sets certain rules. First, it imposes restrictions
on the government's prosecution of persons accused of crimes. Second,
it mandates due process of law. Third, it prohibits
self-incrimination and double jeopardy. Fourth and ultimately, it
requires just compensation if private property is taken for public
use. So, let us first get the text in question and then dissect the
specified part. The text of the fifth amendment to the United States
Constitution renders as namely: “No person shall be held to answer for
a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or
indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or
naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War
or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence
to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in
any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall
private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
Thence, the delimitated text to be oppugned is: “nor shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself”. So
basically, if I am guilty of certain crime and my witness is the
merely decisively cogent evidence for the case, the law, the
constitution actually doesn’t require me to appeal myself indicted if
I do not wish. This particular segment is a denotative breach of
primordial justice. The Noble Koran enjoins those who believe in it to
be incomparably just. Allah says: "O you who have believed, be
persistently standing firm in justice, witnesses for Allah, even if it
be against yourselves, parents and relatives. Whether one is rich or
poor, Allah is more worthy of both. So follow not personal
inclination, lest you not be just. And if you distort your testimony
or refuse to give it, then indeed Allah is ever, with what you do,
Acquainted." For citation, this is the Noble Koran, named chapter of
women, numbered the fourth in a regular Koranic index and the verse is
135. As an exponent for the Koran, I believe it has critically
surpassed the fifth amendment of American constitution in terms of
implementing equitable justice. Consequently, the fifth amendment to
the United States constitution implicitly incites inadequate justice.
Yes it does, it sets a rule for that. A rule is a principle or
condition that customarily governs behavior. This situation is
absolutely heroic. So, to those who’re competent of precisely scoping
just jural, which is fairer, the Koran or the fifth amendment to the
United States constitution. Many people tend to be perfectly
conscienceless. Therefore, if we left people to their own judgement of
the situation, that may possibly lead to major just breaches.
Oppression and iniquity are the primal factor to fertilise
transgression. The spirit of any law has to be objective and
independently unbiased. Hence, the Koran wisn this round. If the
person is encouraged by law not to be witness against him or herself
if they were convicted felonious, this shall give further incentive
for criminal rate increment. I look forward to hosting a discussion
panel on that regard. Thank you for reading, Mustafa
--
(Seeking knowledge is compulsory from cratle to grave because it is a
shoreless ocean.)
