Wealthy and powerful corporations benefit from transfer of public
lands from under federal protection to state protection. Since the
goal is not that of protecting and preserving public lands for public
use, but rather, to position those public lands for easy access by
privateers, state governments can be manipulated more readily.
Carl Jarvis
On 3/5/16, S. Kashdan <skashdan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
How an East Coast Think Tank Is Fueling the Land Transfer Movement
By Lyndsey Gilpin
High Country News, Friday, March 4, 2016
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/35084-how-an-east-coast-think-tank-is-fueling-the-land-transfer-movement?tmpl=component&print=1
This story was originally published on February 26 at High Country News.
Recently, Idaho senators met to vote on a new bill that would let county
sheriffs, commissioners, and mayors decide if an area of federal land is at
risk of wildfire, and demand that the federal government fix it. If the
feds - usually Bureau of Land Management or US Forest Service - don't
respond, local officials could coordinate with the state to take legal
action.
But the bill didn't come to a vote - it was met with contention from the
Idaho Senate largely because it was aligned with the effort to transfer
federal lands to state control. The law is also an example of a larger trend
of legislation in Western states being derived from model bills created by
the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). ALEC - not to be confused
with the Utah-based American Lands Council (ALC) - is a nonprofit
organization founded in 1973 by conservative activist Paul Weyrich that
works to push principles of free-market enterprise, limited federal control,
and more power for state governments. The conservative policy group based in
Arlington, Virginia, whose corporate advisory board includes Exxon Mobil and
tobacco giant Altria, is funded largely by the Koch family and is becoming
increasingly involved in the land transfer movement by providing bill
templates, research and public support to Western legislators.
The Idaho bill illustrates a pattern that seems to be developing in the
West, says Center for Western Priorities policy director Greg Zimmerman.
"Utah comes up with these ideas, passes them into law through their
legislature, and through the ALEC network, [legislators] try and pass them
in other states," he says.
For instance, Utah Rep. Ken Ivory sponsored the Transfer of Public Lands
Act, which demanded that Congress give states control of public lands. It
passed in 2012, but little action has been taken to fulfill the bill's
goals. About a year later, ALEC wrote a similar model bill for land transfer
laws, urging "all executive officers of this State, to exert their full
powers to cooperate and assist Utah and the other States" to sell public
land to state governments. In 2014, Ivory received ALEC's "legislator of the
year" award.
Soon after Utah passed its Catastrophic Wildfire and Public Nuisance Act
last year, ALEC released model legislation for other states using almost
identical language. Last month, a bill with that language was brought to the
Arizona state Senate, but it was killed because the counties opposed it.
"It's a cookie-cutter bill," Idaho state Sen. Roy Lacey, a Democrat, says,
referring to Idaho's Abatement of Catastrophic Public Nuisance bill. "When
you see the same thing being done in Utah and other states, it smacks of
ALEC. It's a toe in the door [of land transfer legislation]: telling the
federal government they're not doing a good job."
The Idaho Freedom Foundation, a conservative think tank and ALEC member,
played a major role in the bill proposal. Catastrophic wildfires are only
worsening in the West, and fighting them already counts for over half the
Forest Service's budget. In Idaho, hundreds of thousands of acres burned
last year, and the foundation places blame on the feds' management
decisions, underplaying the exceedingly complex impacts from drought and
climate change. "It's a simple bill and notion," said Idaho Freedom
Foundation vice president Fred Birnbaum. "Passing one piece of legislation
won't solve it but it does highlight the fact communities are threatened by
federal forest land [management]." Birnbaum said the foundation was fully
aware it was ALEC model legislation when they proposed it.
As the land transfer movement gains traction in the West, the links between
ALEC and Western lawmakers become more clear. For instance, the Federal
Lands Action Group, a relatively new organization started by US Reps. Chris
Stewart and Rob Bishop from Utah, held a forum in Washington, DC, to
introduce land transfer legislation to interested politicians earlier this
month. The first speaker at the forum was Karla Jones, an ALEC staffer.
Stewart said ALEC was chosen to present because its views on public lands
"aligned well" with the Federal Lands Action Group. Jones talked about
ALEC's model policies, urged a timely transfer of federal lands to states,
and showcased ALEC's available resources to help states successfully
transition to state-based land ownership.
"There is a widespread narrative, especially among Americans living in the
East, that the federal government serves as a better environmental steward
of the Western lands than states or private entities would," she said in a
statement. "This is a fiction."
ALEC has played a role in public lands debates as far back as 1995, when it
drafted the "Sagebrush Rebellion Act," to establish mechanisms for public
land transfer to state control, though the act never passed. The Center for
Western Priorities estimates that up to six of ALEC's model policies
advocate public lands transfer. Four years ago, ALEC provided model
legislation to undermine the Antiquities Act and give states power in
designating national monuments. Then in 2015, the organization released a
white paper, which it cites regularly for legislators, that concluded states
would serve as "superior environmental and economic stewards of select lands
within their borders."
Though some legislators, like Ivory, are publicly open about their ALEC
membership, the group does not release who its members are. ALEC did not
respond to multiple requests for comment for this article. But according to
Jones' statements, more than 200 state legislators are members, and 85
members of Congress, seven governors, and four presidential candidates are
alumni. In 2011, the Center for Media and Democracy, a liberal watchdog
organization started by former Department of Justice official Lisa Graves,
launched a project to identify legislators in the US with ALEC ties.
According to the center's latest data, each state in the West has at least a
handful of politicians involved with ALEC - with the most being in Utah and
Idaho.
The Center for Western Priorities reported that, of the 36 public lands
transfer bills introduced in state legislatures in the first half of 2015, a
third were parroting ALEC legislation, either directly using its land
transfer model policy or its other model policies, such as setting up land
transfer studies or state public lands offices. This year, 14 bills have
been introduced, Zimmerman says, and half have already been killed,
including a transfer study bill in Washington and two bills regarding public
access and land transfer in Wyoming.
Though the public nuisance bill doesn't allow state officials to override
federal decisions in wildfire management, it is an example of the burgeoning
relationships between ALEC and Western legislators, says professor Robert
Keiter, director of the Wallace Stegner Center for Land, Resources and the
Environment at the University of Utah: "It seems to be directed at providing
[more power] for state and local officials to influence
on-the-ground-management of Forest Service, BLM, or other federal
agencies."
Lyndsey Gilpin is an editorial intern at High Country News. She tweets
@lyndseygilpin.
RELATED STORIES
Land Grab Cheats North Dakota Tribe Out of $1 Billion, Suits Allege
By Abrahm Lustgarten, ProPublica | Report
The Oregon Standoff and the ALEC-Backed Push to Put States in Control of
Public Land
By Thomas Brom, Truthout | News Analysis
