How Feminists Can Support Afghan Women Living Under the Taliban
When the United States pulled out of Afghanistan, it froze billions of
dollars in Afghan assets, grinding many of the country's most essential
operations to a halt and spreading misery. The US government must release
those funds.
by Medea Benjamin and Ariel Gold
October 14th, 2021
Mint Press News
By Medea Benjamin and
Ariel Gold
WASHINGTON (Jacobin) - Since the Taliban took control of Kabul and the
central government on August 15, efforts to support Afghan women have become
extremely challenging. According to some prominent U.S. feminists with
strong ties to Afghan women, the Taliban "has no legitimacy beyond the
brutal force it commands," and governments, the United Nations and regional
actors should not recognize or work with it. For some, this means isolating
the Taliban by continuing to freeze Afghan funds held overseas and
suspending any assistance that is coordinated with a government agency. But
does that position really help Afghan women?
There's little question that gains made by Afghan women over the past 20
years, particularly urban women, have been rolled back-at least temporarily.
Since coming to power, the Taliban have said girls would be allowed to go to
school, but in some parts of the country, girls are being kept out of grades
7-12. And while female students have continued to attend private
universities, most women enrolled in public universities have not been
attending classes due to fear, canceled classes or Taliban restrictions.
Even though Taliban spokesmen insist that women can continue to work, there
are also frequent reports of Taliban militants ordering women to leave their
workplaces.
While we should all be outraged about the abuses and deterioration of rights
that Afghan women are experiencing, the Taliban aren't the only cause of
women's distress right now. The economy and public services are screeching
to a halt because the international community has pulled the plug on
funding. Afghanistan is a country that has relied on outside donors to fund
its vital services for most of its modern existence. When the U.S. pulled
out of Afghanistan, it froze $9.5 billion of the Afghan Central Bank's
assets and pushed the International Monetary Fund to block Afghanistan's
access to over $450 million earmarked for COVID-19 relief. Adding fuel to
the fire, the World Bank suspended financing to the Afghan healthcare system
through its Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund. Given that foreign aid to
Afghanistan had previously been about $8.5 billion a year - nearly half of
the country's gross domestic product - the impact of freezing these funds is
catastrophic for women and their families.
There are about 220,000 teachers in Afghanistan, and UNICEF estimates that
about a third of them are women. Since June, most teachers haven't been paid
their salaries. On October 6, the 45,000-member Afghan Teachers Association
put out an urgent appeal calling attention to their dire situation. "The
Ministry of Education has very few resources, and it is hard to ask our
teachers to keep working without salaries. Many of them are the sole
breadwinners in their families, and they are really struggling. It will be
difficult to keep the schools open if we have no funds."
And it isn't just Afghan teachers. Most of the nation's healthcare workers
have also been working without salaries. Right now, the country's healthcare
system is on the brink of collapse. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom
Ghebreyesus stated that due to the suspension of funding, Afghan medical
facilities have been unable to buy supplies and pay salaries. According to
UNDP's Asia-Pacific Director Kanni Wignaraja, only about 17 percent of some
2,200 health facilities in Afghanistan are fully functional and the
personnel who are working are doing so on a voluntary basis. "There is a
risk that the Afghan people will have virtually no access to primary health
services," she said.
Prior to the U.S. military withdrawal, the World Bank funded the Sehatmandi
project-a project administered by NGOs that in 2020 provided healthcare
services to 30 million people. To avert a total collapse in healthcare, the
UN Development Fund recently announced that it will temporarily take over
management of the Sehatmandi project from the World Bank, but this is just a
stop-gap measure.
The European Union's announcement on October 12 of a $1.2 billion aid
package is certainly welcome news. So is the announcement by Secretary of
State Anthony Blinken that the US would help fund humanitarian aid. But it
will be nearly impossible to effectively distribute aid while Afghan banks
remain under US and UN sanctions, unable to access physical dollars. And
humanitarian aid will not provide salaries for the nation's civil services.
For that, Afghan's frozen funds must be released. We understand the
opposition to payment mechanisms that flow through Taliban hands. For
salaries, the option of direct payments through UN agencies and NGOs is
indeed the preferred option, as already existed in the case of many
healthcare workers. But can this really be accomplished for the nation's
over 350,000 public workers? And how can the banking system be saved without
lifting sanctions? These are issues that the Biden administration and world
leaders must solve. The intricacies will be discussed at the October 11-17
World Bank and IMF meetings in Washington and at the G20 summit in Rome at
the end of the month.
Feminists must also discuss the complexities. They should not take the
simplistic view that a policy of non-cooperation with the Taliban is the way
to support women. As John Sifton of Human Rights Watch said, "Afghanistan's
underlying economic and humanitarian problems, which disproportionately
affect women and girls, cannot simply be ignored because of the Taliban's
record." We in the West who call ourselves feminists must grapple with the
complexities and emerge as strong advocates for releasing funds that can
stop an entire nation of 40 million people from facing a future of
starvation and misery.
