I've just listened to people describe what happened to them in Washington DC
and in Philadelphia on Monday night on Loud and Clear. What I wrote the
other day was incorrect. This is bigger and much more of a crisis than what
happened in the late 60's. That's probably related to the disintegration of
our society.
Miriam
How American cities were Reduced to Esper's "Battlespace": From Fallujah to
Minneapolis
JUAN COLE
06/03/2020
Ann Arbor (Informed Comment) - The Bush administration's war of aggression
on and military occupation of Iraq that began in 2003 shifted the United
States to a militaristic society. Some 2.7 million Americans have served in
Iraq and Afghanistan, an astonishing number. The Bush administration began
the practice of sending to civilian police departments military equipment no
longer needed in Iraq- everything from Kevlar vests to armored vehicles.
Community policing in some towns and cities gave way to the spectacle of
militarized police, heavily armed and armored, and inevitably separated from
the public they were supposed to serve and protect.
The Bush administration spent trillions on the unprovoked and worthless Iraq
War, money that could have been used to train and finance minority
university students and entrepreneurs. At the same time, it cut taxes on the
wealthy, which is a way of saying that it cut government services for the
middle and working classes.
I grew up in a military family, had uncles who fought in WW II, and have
nothing but respect for Veterans and active duty service personnel. When
I've been privileged to address US military audiences, I've felt honored to
do so. So in this column I am not putting them down in any way. I am,
however, putting down their civilian bosses.
The Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, was a civilian bureaucrat during those
wars (though he had served with distinction as an infantry officer in the
Gulf War). As a Bush administration official (deputy assistant secretary of
defense for negotiations policy), he breathed in the atmosphere of
illegality created by the 2003 war of aggression. On Monday, he told the
nation's governors that "I think the sooner that you mass and dominate the
battlespace, the quicker this dissipates and we can get back to the right
normal."
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley was present on the
call with the governors, during which Trump threatened to violate Posse
Comitatus by sending in the US army to the states to do law enforcement over
the heads of the governors. Milley has a duty to say that he will not obey
such an illegal order. Actually in 1958 Congress specified a two-year prison
term for anyone who acted as Trump said he would act.
Then Esper and Milley accompanied Trump on his Great March from the White
House to St. John's Episcopal Church after Bill Barr ordered military police
illegally to attack peacefully assembled protesters from Lafayette Square.
Esper had no business being involved in the march on on St. John's church,
where Trump had had military police tear-gas clergymen.
James Miller, himself a former undersecretary of defense for policy,
resigned from the Defense Advisory Board in protest over Esper's
involvement, which he called a violation of Esper's oath of office.
But above all Gen. Milley should resign for having been present during an
unconstitutional act of repression. Milley gives evidence of being what is
called in the trade a "weasel," of giving his superior whatever he wants. We
may well have a constitutional crisis in the beginning of November, and
citizens of the American Republic have a right to know that the chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff is above the partisan fray and loyal to the
Constitution. After Monday's events, I don't think we have that assurance.
Where did this way of thinking even come from?
In 2003 when Bush aggressively made war on Iraq and militarily occupied the
city, initially a lot of Iraqis were on the fence. In the city of Fallujah,
then about the population of Miami, Fl., people gradually turned against the
Occupation. The US military took over a school as a base, and parents
complained that it would ever after make their children a target. The US
colonels wouldn't listen. There were crowd protests. Someone used the
demonstration as a pretext and opportunity to fire on US service personnel.
They fired back. From that incident things spiraled out of control. People
in Fallujah were Sunni Arabs and were religiously conservative. They
sympathized with Palestinians and knew that US was backing Ariel Sharon in
his efforts to repress them. People became increasingly radicalized. Abu
Musab al-Zarqawi's Tawhid terrorist organization gained a foothold. In the
spring of 2004, 4 contractors were killed, infuriating George W. Bush.
After his reelection, Bush was determined to make Fallujah safe for
patrolling US soldiers. I am not sure it ever really was.
He launched a major invasion of the city. We are told that the US Air Force
played an important role through "precision bombing." Rebecca Grant writes,
"For several weeks before the main assault, air strikes and artillery fire
targeted key sites in the city as they were identified. The hunt for
insurgents evolved into battlespace shaping."
What isn't said is that most of Fallujah's residents ended up being
displaced, many living in tents in the desert, and much of the city was
reduced to rubble. That is "battlespace shaping" for you.
Esper clearly thinks of Cleveland and Oakland as "Fallujahs," as
"battlespaces" departing from the "right kind of normal." People in Fallujah
had resented being invaded and ruled by foreigners who reduced them to 65%
unemployment. Some 40 million Americans just lost their jobs, in part
because of the ineptitude of the administration of which Esper forms a part
(South Korea is better governed and did not close down, using large scale
testing, contact tracing, and mask-wearing instead).
A significant part of the American elite was shaped by Bush's wars to think
about dissidence as the equivalent of insurgency and to see challenges to
the status quo as illegitimate.
The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg concluded, "War is
essentially an evil thing. Its consequences are not confined to the
belligerent states alone, but affect the whole world. To initiate a war of
aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme
international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains
within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
Bush's war of aggression contained within itself the accumulated evil of the
whole, and now that evil is spreading out to turn us all into Fallujans.
----
