They're basing this on modern monetary theory which, in my unsophisticated
understanding of their simplifide descriptions that I've heard of it, really
does mean that the government creates money. But what I'd suggest you do,
because you'll probably understand it a lot better than I, is to look up some
of what has been written on Modern Monetary Theory.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Roger Loran Bailey
(Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 8:39 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Government Spends Equivalent of Entire US
Student Debt to Rally Stock Market for 15 Minutes
I will have to disagree with this article that all that money came out of thin
air. At least the value that the money represents did not come from thin air.
As I have said before, money is a measure of wealth. It is not a fixed measure
like a yardstick or a scale gives you. It is a measure that allows us to keep
track of what proportion of the available wealth is controlled by whom. Since
the available wealth fluctuates as wealth is created and used up the value of
the money also fluctuates.
But if more money is added while that addition of money has nothing to do with
how much wealth exists then that means that the wealth is only being measured
in smaller increments. That is, everyone else's money becomes worth less. So
was that infusion of money really made out of thin air? I say no. It was
effectively stolen from all the rest of us.
Each dollar in my wallet is now worth a little less because of this and I had
no control over how that vanished value was spent. It was taken from me to be
put into the stock market against my will.
___
Neil deGrasse Tyson
“God is an ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance.”
― Neil DeGrasse Tyson
On 3/13/2020 4:57 PM, miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
HOW WILL YOU PAY FOR IT?
Government Spends Equivalent of Entire US Student Debt to Rally Stock
Market for 15 Minutes The money spent was equal to the total amount of US
student debt, more than twice as much as the Wall Street bailout of 2008 and
nearly 30 times the net worth of former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, the
richest man to ever run for president.
by Alan Macleod
March 13th, 2020
By Alan Macleod
FacebookTwitterRedditEmailMore
With financial markets in a state of near panic over an incoming COVID-19
pandemic, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York took the extraordinary step of
injecting over $1.5 trillion into the stock market yesterday in a bid to calm
investors’ fears about a collapse. To put that into perspective, that number
is equal to the total amount of student debt held in the country, more than
twice as much as the original TARP bailout during the 2008 financial crash,
and nearly 30 times the net worth of former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg,
the richest man to ever run for president.
Despite the enormous investment, the market rallied for only around 15
minutes before immediately slumping, negating the spike within two hours.
Today, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is over 3,000 points lower than
yesterday, with a third of all value wiped from the stock market in just two
weeks. President Trump has demanded more intervention to help the markets.
Meanwhile, his son Eric was busy deleting previous statements he made
advising people that this would be a great time to invest and win big.
Shaun
@shaun_vids
imo, the best sort of economic system is one so fragile that we need
to pretend a pandemic isn't happening to avoid frightening it to death
27.4K
9:51 AM - Mar 12, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
5,473 people are talking about this
Earlier this week the government decreed that all medical facilities
nationwide conduct coronavirus testing free of charge. And even establishment
Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are demanding comprehensive
social welfare reform, including emergency paid sick leave and healthcare,
despite campaigning their whole lives against those policies. As recently as
Monday, Biden, the Democratic frontrunner for president, suggested he would
veto any Medicare for All bill that the House of Representatives passed.
These new positions from the Democratic elite have certainly surprised many
activists who have fought for universal healthcare for decades, and have
faced committed opposition from Democrats, Republicans and the media alike.
During the Democratic primary debates, moderators asked 21 questions about
where the money was going to come from to pay for programs like free
healthcare or student loan relief, but never once asked about financing
aggression against Iran or any other enemy nation. Yet, in the face of a
crisis, it appears Washington is trying to gauge how much free healthcare
will be necessary to avoid a disaster.
Stephanie Kelton
✔
@StephanieKelton
For those who might be wondering, “Where did the Federal Reserve get the $1.5
trillion they just committed to injecting?”
A blast from the past explanation of how it all works. 💻
Embedded video
18.7K
4:24 PM - Mar 12, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
8,663 people are talking about this
In reality, the $1.5 trillion came from the same place as it always has: from
thin air. The Fed simply added some numbers into a balance sheet and the
money was created. Authorities could do the same to fight many of America’s
most pressing social problems: homelessness, hunger, crumbling
infrastructure, poverty, but to do so would be to use the power of the
government to help the great mass of people, rather than those at the top.
Italy, for instance, has declared that all mortgage repayments were
postponed. New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has suggested the
U.S. do the same with student debt.
The great anthropologist David Graeber notes that during periods of disaster,
societies tend to move towards communism. “People tend to behave the same
way, reverting to a kind of rough-and-ready communism,” he writes.
“Hierarchies, markets and the like become luxuries that no one can really
afford them. Anyone who has lived through such a moment can speak to the way
strangers become sisters and brothers, and human society itself seems to be
reborn.”
The radical measures being pushed through almost overnight show that
wholesale systemic change is distinctly possible. However, the Trump
administration appears focused on ensuring that there will be one rule for
those at the top and another for the rest of society.
John Iadarola
✔
@johniadarola
To the extent that our government is worried about the coronavirus, it seems
like 99% of their worry is on how it will affect the bottom line of the
biggest corporations in the world.
1,739
10:40 AM - Mar 12, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
402 people are talking about this
The number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in the United States rose above 1,700
today, with 41 recorded deaths in total. However, due to sparse testing, the
actual figures are undoubtedly higher. The U.S. has tested only around 8,000
people nationwide. In comparison, South Korea is capable of testing 20,000
every day. A number of prominent figures, such as actor Tom Hanks and NBA
player Rudy Gobert, are among the confirmed cases. Yesterday, MintPress spoke
to Sarpoma Sefa-Boakye, a doctor in San Diego, CA. She advised that:
“Quarantining is the only way to really tackle a virus that you don’t know,
where transmission is questionable, or even how this virus came to be,
quarantining has to be the only way that we can get a hold of transmission.”
Dr. Sefa-Boakye was also critical of the government’s response, noting:
The fact that we have to question potential stock market losses and question
whether we are going to be able to provide paid or unpaid leave to our
workers is telling you that we are not equipped for pandemics because our
priority is markets and production.”
