This first article, regarding plans to build a nuclear plant in Great
Britain, is a sales pitch for nuclear energy. Read carefully and along with
the damage, briefly mentioned, is the clear message that the accident would
not have taken place, had it not been for humor error and attempts to save
money by cutting corners, two things that are typical behavior.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/nov/19/uk-government-new-plant-
fukushima-nuclear-disaster-warning
On the other hand,
https://progressive.org/magazine/shadow-fukushima/
https://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/25/the-global-threat-of-fukushima/
And 6 years later
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/09/fukushima-nuclear-cleanup-falt
ers-six-years-after-tsunami
The most informative article is the one from Counterpunch.
Miriam
