Facebook 'whistleblower' Frances Haugen represented by US intelligence
insiders
ALEXANDER RUBINSTEIN.OCTOBER 21, 2021
The background of Frances Haugen's Whistleblower Aid legal team indicates
she was cultivated to complete Facebook's transformation into a vehicle for
the US national security state.
A former employee of Facebook named Frances Haugen earned national renown
after appearing before Congress on October 5, 2021 to accuse the company
where she once worked of everything from poisoning the minds of young
American women to aiding and abetting global evildoers.
While Haugen has presented herself as a "whistleblower" who risked it all to
expose the secrets of the powerful, she was cultivated and legally
represented by an organization led by former intelligence insiders with
close ties to the US national security state.
Called Whistleblower Aid, the outfit was founded by a national security
lawyer, Mark Zaid, who has been accused of ratting out his client, CIA
whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling, to his employers in Langley. Zaid is joined
by a former State Department official and government-approved whistleblower,
John Tye, ex-CIA and Pentagon official Andrew Bakaj, and veteran US
government information warrior, Libby Liu, who has specialized in supporting
color revolution-style operations against China.
John Kiriakou, the CIA whistleblower jailed for exposing the agency's role
in the serial torture of terror suspects, commented to The Grayzone, "Mark
Zaid presents himself to the public as a whistleblower attorney, however, he
is anything but. Instead, he has betrayed his clients and come down on the
side of prosecutors in the intelligence community. He is not to be trusted."
Kiriakou continued, "My own personal belief is that he is the intelligence
community's preferred 'whistleblower' attorney because he's willing to place
their interests over his clients."
Tech billionaire and media mogul Pierre Omidyar has provided funding to
Whistleblower Aid, as well as to a public relations firm assisting Haugen.
Omidyar has played his own role in US foreign interventionism, sponsoring
anti-government media outlets and activists alongside US government agencies
in states where Washington seeks regime change.
Following the October 5 remarks by the "Facebook whistleblower," Senate
Subcommittee on Consumer Protection Chair Sen. Richard Blumenthal commended
Haugen for her "courage" and "strength" in "standing up to one of the most
powerful, implacable corporate giants in the history of the world." For her
part, Haugen claimed to have come forward with her testimony "at great
personal risk."
However, Haugen is now set to meet with the oversight board at Facebook,
suggesting the supposed underdog whistleblower had never been a threat to
her former employer, and may have been colluding in a mutually beneficial
operation. Haugen emphasized in her testimony that she "doesn't want to
break up" Facebook; she was merely looking for increased "content
moderation" to root out "extremism" and "(mis/dis)information."
While the public has been led to believe that Haugen embarked on her
censorious moral crusade all by herself, driven by nothing more than her own
sense of indignation and desire to stamp out "misinformation," her testimony
tracked closely with a narrative that has emerged from the US national
security state and which aims to prevent the flow of information from
counter-hegemonic "bad actors."
The agenda was laid bare by Haugen herself, who claimed she worked alongside
intelligence assets at a previously unknown Facebook "threat intelligence
unit," and made repeated reference to supposed malign activities by
designated US enemies including Ethiopia, Myanmar, Western China and Iran..
As this report will reveal, Haugen appears to be little more than a tool in
a far-reaching plan to increase the US national security state's control
over one of the world's most popular social media platforms.
"Facebook whistleblower" Frances Haugen in 2015
The making of a phony Facebook whistleblower
Haugen first appeared in September 2021 as the supposed source of a leak
called "The Facebook Files." She was immediately hailed as a "modern US
hero" in the media for secretly copying tens of thousands of internal
Facebook documents and releasing them to the Wall Street Journal, which
published a series of nine articles based on the documents.
The WSJ initially kept its source anonymous, rolling out the series two
weeks before Haugen came forward in an October 3 interview with 60 Minutes.
On camera, she complained that Facebook was "tearing our societies apart and
causing ethnic violence around the world."
"Ethnic violence including Myanmar in 2018 when the military used Facebook,"
narrated 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley, to "launch a genocide."
When pressed by 60 Minutes about what motivated her to leak the documents,
Haugen answered vaguely: "at some point in 2021, I realized I'm going to
have to do this in a systematic way and I have to get enough [so] that no
one can question that this is real."
Yet Haugen first divulged company information before 2021. In the final
installment of the Journal's series, the outlet revealed that Haugen first
sent an encrypted text to one of their reporters on December 3, 2020.
That same article, published the day the 60 Minutes interview aired,
reported that Haugen "continued gathering material from inside Facebook
through her last hour with access to the system. She reached out to lawyers
at Whistleblower Aid, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit that represents people
reporting corporate and government misbehavior."
Haugen's resignation with Facebook was effective in March, but the precise
day of her client-attorney relationship with Whistleblower Aid remains
unknown. What is known is that it all came together quickly.
John Tye, a founder and the Chief Disclosure Officer at Whistleblower Aid,
told the New York Times that he agreed to represent Haugen "within a few
minutes" of speaking with her.
On October 5, Haugen testified at a Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer
Protection. But already she had "spoken to lawmakers in France and Britain,
as well as a member of European Parliament," according to the New York Times
on October 3, the day her identity was revealed on 60 Minutes. The outlet
added: "This month, she is scheduled to appear before a British
parliamentary committee. That will be followed by stops at Web Summit, a
technology conference in Lisbon, and in Brussels to meet with European
policymakers in November," citing Tye.
Alongside Haguen's big reveal came the launch of a new website and a new
Twitter account, which was immediately verified. Haugen's old Twitter
account was locked when she went public and has since been deleted, while
her old blog is no longer online.
It is instructive to contrast Haugen's overnight verification with the way
Twitter has treated others who have furnished secret documents in order to
expose wrongdoing by the elite - namely, the jailed Wikileaks co-founder
Julian Assange, who never received verification from Twitter.
During her opening remarks to Congress, Haugen weaved a narrative that tied
the State Department's interventionist agenda to the Democratic Party's
crusade for online censorship. She commented that "what we saw in Myanmar
and are now seeing in Ethiopia are only the opening chapters of a story so
terrifying no one wants to read the end of it."
Later, Haugen nodded her head in agreement as Sen. Dan Sullivan called Iran
the biggest state sponsor or terrorism in the world and China a "communist
party dictatorship" that is the most serious competitor to the US in the
21st century. Oddly, she made no mention of malign activity by any US ally
or country that was not currently sanctioned by the US Department of State.
At Facebook, Haugen claimed she worked as product manager on a "threat
intelligence unit" at the company. "So I was a product manager supporting
the counter-espionage team," she claimed to Sen. Sullivan. Part of her job
included "directly work[ing] on tracking Chinese participation on the
platform," she claimed. Further, she alleged that Iran used the platform to
conduct "espionage" on the platform.
"I'm speaking to other members of Congress about that," Haugen acknowledged.
"I have strong national security concerns about how Facebook operates
today."
As journalist Kit Klarenberg reported, the little-known Facebook "threat
intelligence unit" where Haugen claimed to have worked is staffed by former
CIA, NSA, and Pentagon operatives. Those who work at the unit must have "5+
years of experience working in intelligence (either government or private
sector), international geopolitical, cybersecurity, or human rights
functions," according to a job posting.
Yet Haugen's now-deleted blog and Twitter account feature no political
content, nor does her resume. On Twitter, she frequently discussed taking
Ambien and flirting with boys, while on her blog she wrote about cycling
through Europe. Apart from a lecture she delivered on "The Intersection of
Product Management and Gender," and donations to the Democratic Party, she
has shown little discernible interest in politics. So how did a certifiable
normie with jobs at Google, Pinterest, Yelp! become an expert on Iran and
China?
The background of Haugen's shady legal team suggests she has been
cultivated, coached and deployed to complete Facebook's transformation into
a fully-controlled vehicle of US foreign policy imperatives, willing to
de-rank or outright censor any views the US government deems
"misinformation."
The best whistleblower outfit Pierre Omidyar's money could buy
Whistleblower Aid bills itself as "a pioneering, non-profit legal
organization that helps patriotic government employees and brave,
private-sector workers report and publicize their concerns - safely,
lawfully, and responsibly."
But is this group truly the whistleblower protection outfit it claims to be?
In fact, Whistleblower Aid appears to have been modeled as a sort of
anti-Wikileaks organization. "Whistleblower Aid is not Wikileaks," the
"vision" page of the former organization insists. On another section of its
website, it states, "No one should ever send classified information to
Whistleblower Aid. Whistleblower Aid will never assist clients or
prospective clients with leaking classified information."
Whistleblower Aid was launched with support from Ebay founder and
billionaire media mogul Pierre Omidyar. Through his Luminate foundation,
Omidyar lavished $150,000 on the organization, while funding a non-profit,
the Center for Humane Technology, that works for the same PR firm that
represents Haugen.
Politico has portrayed Omidyar as a "tech critic," suggesting his support
for Haugen is motivated by his disgust at Facebook's propagation of toxic
content. However, as this journalist and Max Blumenthal reported, Omidyar's
political empire has functioned for years as a force multiplier for
interventionist US initiatives.
Over the past decade, Omidyar's various non-profits have sponsored the
establishment of a broadcast outlet, Hromadske, in Ukraine that drove the
country's 2014 coup, backed anti-government bloggers and activists in
Zimbabwe, and funded anti-government media in the Philippines, including
2021 Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Ressa. In each case, Omidyar's
beneficiaries were simultaneously sponsored by US government entities
dedicated to advancing regime change.
A further hint of Omidyar's adjacency to US intelligence operations can be
found in the 2018-2022 strategy plan of the billionaire's Luminate
foundation, which lists "counter[ing]" Russia and China & "provid[ing]
critical support" to groups in "countries in transition" as top priorities.
Whistleblower Aid rose to national prominence by representing the anonymous
whistleblower who fueled the carefully confected Trump-Ukraine scandal that
eventually led to former President Donald Trump's impeachment.
But Whistleblower Aid is more than a mere law firm. It also "prep[s] clients
in order to be focused on how to answer questions properly," Mark Zaid, the
organizations' founding legal partner, told Gizmodo.
"We have media experts that we work with to guide folks with something as
simple as, you know, where do you look when you're talking to a camera or a
host?" Zaid explained. "How do you best fluidly answer a question to come
across in a positive way? Everything that might be connected to ensuring the
individual's image and substance are at their best."
"The US government's ideal whistleblower"
The rollout of the Frances Haugen story was methodical and lightning-paced,
and clearly a collaborative effort. "I came forward at great personal risk
because I believe we still have time to act," Haugen told Congress. Sen.
Blumenthal responded with a promise that Congress would protect her.
But was any risk truly present? In Haugen's first conversations with
Whistleblower Aid founder and Chief Disclosure Officer John Tye, she asked
him for "legal protection and a path to releasing the confidential
information."
Zaid launched the group after serving as legal counsel for his co-founder,
John Tye, when Tye supposedly "blew the whistle" on the State Department.
Tye was recruited to the State Department by former Assistant Secretary of
State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Michael Posner. Now a
prominent "human rights" lawyer, Posner was tasked with providing counsel to
a group of seven Israeli generals accused by the United Nations of war
crimes following Operation Cast Lead, a three-week long massacre of 1,400
Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip, Wikileaks revealed in its release
of US diplomatic cables. Ironically, Posner was also charged with overseeing
the State Department's review of those cable leaks.
Tye was named as the section chief for internet freedom under Posner at the
State Department. But to understand Tye's work at the State Department, it
is necessary to revisit a speech from his former boss, ex-Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton, delivered a year prior to Tye's appointment at State, but
nonetheless a blueprint for the kind of work the department was doing;
attacking countries like Iran and China for "erect[ing] electronic
barriers."
It was during Clinton's campaign for "internet freedom," which established
Tye's position, that the United States Agency for International Development
(USAID), an arm of the State Department, developed ZunZuneo, a fake social
media service marketed to Cubans. This information weapon was deployed by
the US in a failed attempt to spur Cuban youths to launch street protests
and destabilize Cuba's socialist government.
It was Tye's job to travel around the world and push for "the open use of
the internet, free from government interference and monitoring."
However, following Edward Snowden's exposure of mass surveillance by the
National Security Agency, Tye began working explicitly against the open
exchange of information by collaborating with the agency on tactics to
undermine the leaker.
Around the same time, Tye learned about Executive Order 12333, which allows
the NSA to collect information on American citizens outside of US borders.
Tye "blew the whistle" in an op-ed at the Washington Post, allowing both the
NSA and the State Department to review his disclosures before publishing.
Neither made any changes to the policy.
Prior to speaking with reporters about his disclosure, Tye made sure he had
a witness present and promised that he would not be revealing any classified
information. "If you hear something that sounds like I am talking about
classified activities or NSA activities, I want to tell you right now you
misheard what I said," his disclaimer went.
"The only reason why I ever got an NSA briefing was because we had to
develop a response to Snowden's leaks," Tye told Ars Technica. "I never
would have found out enough to file a complaint if it hadn't been for those
leaks."
He also enlisted the help of Mark Zaid "to help him navigate the lawful
reporting process."
Despite being indebted to Snowden, and Snowden having actually been the
first to expose how EO 12333 was "the wellspring of NSA's collection of
information," Tye's attorney, Zaid has repeatedly maligned Snowden.
"Unlike Snowden, Tye will not offer up any examples of actual unlawful
surveillance he learned about while working at the State Department. He's
honoring his secrecy agreements," Zaid has said.
Zaid, who has falsely accused Snowden of refusing to attempt to go through
proper channels, argues that the best way to seek policy change is through
official processes. And he has painted Tye as "a shining example of how a
national security whistleblower should raise his concerns lawfully and give
the system and public time to debate the concerns, rather than decide
unilaterally as Snowden did."
Tye quickly emerged as a model for disclosing government secrets, with
corporate media headlines describing him as "the US Government's Ideal New
Whistleblower" and "the kinder, gentler, and by-the-book whistleblower."
Just Security, a Democratic Party-oriented national security blog funded by
George Soros' Open Society Foundations and featuring a board of insiders
including Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines and National
Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, hailed Tye at the time as a "hero" on par
with the late Senator John McCain. However, the site noted that "the jury is
still out on whether Tye's whistleblowing will lead to meaningful reforms."
At the time, Tye claimed he hoped to "see a public response to my complaint
that describes what changes have been made."
Flash forward to September 16, 2021, and Just Security is still calling for
reform to EO 12333. Indeed, Tye's milquetoast brand of whistleblowing failed
to result in any meaningful policy changes, though he did get some
presidential lip service, commenting that "even President Obama has
acknowledged that the issues raised since those disclosures have been
important for our democracy."
Coincidentally, days before leaving office, Obama expanded Executive Order
12333, allowing the NSA to share the data it warrantlessly collected with
other intelligence agencies without the requirement of a court order. It was
this executive order which enabled the NSA to wiretap Trump's incoming
National Security Director Michael Flynn, and leak the contents of his phone
call with Russia's then-Ambassador to the US Sergei Kislyak to the media.
Despite the abject failure of Zaid's preferred "lawful" method of
whistleblowing, he and Tye would go on to form Whistleblower Aid, but not
before leaving the State Department to work for another shady outfit that
was knee deep in NATO interventionist operations.
From July 2014 to July 2015, Tye served as the Legal Director and Campaign
Director of Avaaz, a digital activist group and PR firm that helped drum up
support for a no-fly zone in Libya, as Grayzone editor Max Blumenthal has
reported.
During Tye's time with Avaaz, which received early financial backing from
Soros' Open Society Foundation, the organization pushed for a no-fly zone
again, this time in Syria. Further, Avaaz helped spawn a PR organization
called Purpose, which handled public relations for the USAID-funded and
al-Qaeda-linked White Helmets organization in Syria.
During the Arab Spring, Avaaz ponied up $1.5 million to "provide
pro-democracy movements with 'high-tech phones and satellite internet
modems, connect them to the world's top media outlets, and provide
communications advice,'" according to the BBC.
Avaaz has set up proxy servers in Iran to support the Iran's Green Movement
and orchestrated a "three mile human chain handshake from the Dalai Lama to
the doors of the Chinese Embassy in London." More recently, the organization
sponsored a rally demanding an investigation on Capitol Hill in response to
the Wall Street Journal's "Facebook Files" series, which featured Haugen as
its source.
Shortly before leaving Avaaz, Tye responded to criticism of the
billionaire-backed group's advocacy for a no-fly zone, writing "thousands
and thousands of people will die, for years to come, if we turn away and
wring our hands."
Like his former client-turned-legal partner, Mark Zaid has clamored for
ramped up US intervention in Syria, tweeting to then-President Trump "what
are you going to do about Syria? It's your problem now, We can't stand by
and let innocent people continue to be slaughtered."
Whistleblower Aid, or whistleblowers played?
Early in Zaid's legal career, he "helped lobby Congress to change the law so
the Libyan government could be sued for its secret plot to blow up Pan Am
Flight 103 in 1988." Since then, he has built a reputation around
representing whistleblowers, though he is now "representing many of the
federal officials who have been afflicted with the mysterious symptoms known
as Havana syndrome."
While Mark Zaid may earn the most corporate media ink of any lawyer
specializing in supposed whistleblower cases in the US, he is also one of
the most vitriolic antagonists of those who blew the whistle without
official consent. Regarding Edward Snowden, Zaid has tweeted that the exiled
whistleblower "in no way deserves a pardon."
Zaid believes that only those who have exposed wrongdoing dutifully within
an organizational infrastructure deserve to be designated as whistleblowers.
If they have attempted to do so but found themselves stonewalled, and took
their information to the media, in his view, that action classifies them as
a traitor guilty of espionage.
Thus according to Zaid, Snowden is not a whistleblower, nor is Julian
Assange a journalist. Zaid celebrated the June 2020 superseding indictment
of Assange by the Department of Justice as "a message to those who want to
undermine US national security that you will be pursued."
Even Reality Winner, whose leak of classified information was spun by the
media to advance the discredited narrative of Russian collusion with
President Donald Trump - whom Zaid has attacked and even sued - is also not
a whistleblower, Zaid argued in the Washington Post.
While Zaid has made his feelings clear towards those who leak classified
information through "improper" channels, he has faced harsh criticism for
his handling of the case of one of his former clients, CIA whistleblower
Jeffrey Sterling.
"WikiLeaks is aware, from those directly involved, of serious allegations
that Mark S. Zaid revealed one of his clients to the CIA. The client was
later imprisoned," WikiLeaks has tweeted. CIA torture whistleblower John
Kiriakou has written of Zaid: "Any friend or advocate of rats and snitches
is no friend of whistleblowers."
Whistleblower Thomas Drake has raised similar concerns, pointing in 2015 to
transcripts detailing FBI special agent Ashley Hunt's comments during the
trial of Jeffrey Sterling.
"The CIA advised that on February 24, 2003, it was contacted by Mark Zaid
and Roy Krieger," Hunt told the court. "They told the CIA on February 24
that a client of theirs had contacted them on February 21, 2003, and that
that client, that unnamed client at the time, voiced his concerns about an
operation that was nuclear in nature, and he threatened to go to the media."
Additionally, the FBI served Zaid with a subpoena compelling him to testify
in the case of his former client, Sterling. Zaid has claimed that he did not
breach attorney-client privilege at any time and called FBI agent Ashley
Hunt's testimony "hearsay."
Sterling declined to comment to The Grayzone about Zaid's performance as his
lawyer, and whether he played a role in his prosecution.
"With no intention of stating an opinion one way or another, I will not
comment on Mr. Zaid or his representation," Sterling stated.
"All the Disney one needs and wants to be"
While Zaid maintains utmost hostility towards those who leak classified
information, even refusing to work with them, he has no moral qualms about
getting security clearances for "guys who had child porn issues."
Zaid also has a special place in his heart for Disney and potentially
"Disney girls." An archived version of a YouTube channel which appears to
belong to him shows that he 'liked' videos including "Top 10 prettiest
disney channel stars" and "Top 10 Disney Girls."
While Tye and Zaid's records raise serious questions about their commitment
to protecting whistleblowers at genuine risk of high-level retaliation, they
are not the only staffers at Whistleblower Aid with close ties to the US
national security state.
Whistleblower Aid CEO Libby Liu details how she is "fighting against the
Chinese government"
The spooks at Whistleblower Aid's door
At almost the same time that Haugen began working with Whistleblower Aid in
the Spring of this year, the organization took on a new CEO named Libby Liu.
Liu previously served as CEO of Open Technology Fund (OTF), which was
established by the CIA-founded propaganda outlet Radio Free Asia as part of
Hillary Clinton's "internet freedom" campaign.
Prior to her role at OTF, Liu served as President of Radio Free Asia for
over 14 years. The Radio Free Asia website credits Liu herself with creating
the Open Technology Fund.
In addition to pumping millions of dollars into projects like Tor and
Signal, the Open Technology Fund boasts that "more than two-thirds of all
mobile users globally have technology incubated by OTF on their device."
Moreover, OTF claims it "has investigated and exposed apps used for
repressive surveillance throughout China, including tools used by the
government to target religious minority Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang
province."
OTF helped fund the 2019 protests and riots in Hong Kong "to provide fast
relief for civil society groups, protesters, journalists and human rights
defenders who have come under digital attack."
Having helped rioters who invaded and ransacked Hong Kong's parliament to
evade censorship, Liu is now working with a legal firm representing a client
that will meet with the Congressional committee investigating the January 6
"insurrection" - undoubtedly to bolster the case for more internet
censorship.
Another key figure at Whistleblower Aid is Andrew Bakaj. Like John Tye and
Mark Zaid, Bakaj is not only representing Haugen, but promoting her in the
media as well.
Bakaj also happens to be a former CIA officer and criminal investigator at
the Department of Defense. Since leaving the agency, he has teamed up with
his former attorney, Mark Zaid, and taken on similar cases including the
"Ukraine whistleblower" and "State Department officials impacted by 'Havana
Syndrome.'"
On Twitter, Bakaj mocked Julian Assange as he took refuge inside the
Ecuadorian embassy in London, taunting him to "step outside" and get some
Vitamin D.
Behind the carefully confected image of Frances Haugen as a courageous
whistleblower, the stated views and questionable record of her legal team at
Whistleblower Aid suggest she is little more than pawn in a much more
far-reaching game aimed at enhancing the national security state's already
substantial power over social media.
