Boardman writes: "The illegal, brutal war that goes unspoken (except as a
'nine-month conflict that started in March') is the genocidal bombing of
Yemen by Saudi Arabia and its mostly Sunni-Arab allies. This is essentially
a rolling war crime of unending dimension, all supported materially,
tactically, and unjustly by the US."
A Houthi Shiite fighter stands guard on Thursday as people search for
survivors under the rubble of houses destroyed by Saudi airstrikes near
Sanaa Airport. (photo: AP)
Endless War Crimes in Yemen Slowed by Ceasefire
By William Boardman, Reader Supported News
18 December 15
Saudi Arabia's Yemen has a fascist whiff of Franco's Spain circa 1936
The first lie about Yemen's dirty war in the world of official journalism is
that the fighting there has been a "nine-month conflict" and that "the
conflict started in March," as the New York Times put it on December 17.
This is simply not true in any meaningful sense. What started in March was a
savage, one-sided air war backed by the US, all too similar to the
Nazi-backed one-sided air war in Spain in the thirties that gave the world
"Guernica" (back when the Nazis and the Saudis were chummy). Yemen's civil
war has already lasted decades, on and off. And Yemen has an even longer
history of conflict (all of which the Times knows, without letting
perspective clarify its reporting). For decades at least, Yemen has suffered
from chronic foreign interventions and manipulations, none of which have
brought much peace to the Yemeni people, who live in one of the oldest
civilized regions of the world.
The illegal, brutal war that goes unspoken (except as a "nine-month conflict
that started in March") is the genocidal bombing of Yemen by Saudi Arabia
and its mostly Sunni-Arab allies. This is essentially a rolling war crime of
unending dimension, all supported materially, tactically, and unjustly by
the US. The US is at war (the naval blockade alone is an act of war) with
Yemen, on the side of the aggressors, and Congress doesn't seem to know
about it, presidential candidates fail to talk about it, the media report it
little but dishonestly, and the nation stumbles on in bloody silence as its
moral numbness deepens.
The sides in Yemen (there are at least four) are complicated, but the main
axis of conflict is between the Houthis (and elements of the Yemeni
government) and the remnants of the Yemeni government driven into exile by
the Houthis, triggering the Saudi bombing campaign. The Houthis are an
indigenous, tribal, Zaidi Shia Muslim population in northwest Yemen that has
been in rebellion since 2004. They live in a region where people have lived
continuously for more than 7,000 years. The Yemeni government in exile has
only a veneer of legitimacy, having been installed by a foreign alliance
(including Saudi Arabia) and confirmed in an election without opposition.
Neither side is particularly savory. A purported Houthi logo reads: "God is
Great, Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse on the Jews, Victory to
Islam." Saudi Arabia is an intolerant police state that has promoted
fundamentalist Sunni jihad and counts ISIS among its allies in Yemen. These
people, one way and another, have been at each other's throats for
centuries.
Periodic peace talks put off mass starvation among Yemeni civilians
The possibility of good news recently was that peace talks began on December
15 at an undisclosed location in Switzerland, mediated by the UN special
envoy for Yemen, Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. He reportedly facilitated an
exchange by shuttling back and forth between the parties, working on issues
as a middleman as long as the parties remain unwilling to talk directly. The
talks are "aimed at establishing a permanent and comprehensive ceasefire,"
according to the UN. Previous talks in June and September have produced only
marginal benefits, mostly allowing humanitarian aid to be distributed to a
population close to starvation and without a medical system (the Saudis have
bombed hospitals). Whether the talks can do more than minimally relieve some
suffering is doubtful, since the Saudi side has shown no willingness to
negotiate anything but the terms of Houthi surrender.
The role of the UN is self-contradictory in Yemen. UN aid agencies are
trying to save as many civilian lives as possible (about 6,000 have died in
the conflict so far, roughly half of them civilians) and the UN special
envoy is trying to find a negotiated settlement. The UN Security Council has
made a negotiated settlement all but impossible by passing in April, in the
midst of the Saudi-led war in violation of international law, a resolution
that virtually calls for the Houthis to surrender and disarm, with no
provision for their security. Resolution 2216 in effect applauds the
Saudi-led indiscriminate bombing of Yemen (the exact, Orwellian language is
"commending its engagement" [emphasis in original]). Resolution 2216
essentially blames the Houthis for everything:
such actions taken by the Houthis [that] undermine the political transition
process in Yemen, and jeopardize the security, stability, sovereignty and
unity of Yemen.
Unity of Yemen is a fantasy. Sovereignty of Yemen has been violated by
anyone who wants to, including the Saudis, al Qaeda, ISIS (the Islamic
State), and the US, first with drone assassinations, now with the Saudi-led
war. Security in Yemen has been little more than a random hope for years,
not least because of US civilian-killing drones. If the political transition
process in Yemen had been more than political myth-making, the Houthis'
interests would have been respected and peace preserved. Resolution 2216:
Calls on all parties to comply with their obligations under international
law, including applicable international humanitarian law and human rights
law.
The resolution passed without dissent (Russia abstained) with some countries
voting for compliance with laws they were openly violating in their
participation in the Saudi-led war. While singling out the Houthis for
blame, US Representative to the UN Samantha Power omitted mention of US
participation in the bombing campaign and naval blockade. She managed to
express the full absurdity of a resolution divorced from reality, when she
said that:
The resolution also recognized the costs of the rapidly deteriorating
humanitarian crisis. A consensus agreement of all political parties was the
only way forward; the United Nations must continue its efforts in that
light.
Continuing to talk about talking allows bombing to go on unimpeded
The most obvious way to alleviate the humanitarian crisis, even back in
April, was to stop bombing and lift the blockade. It wasn't going to happen.
It hasn't happened.
Those who might do most to quell the carnage aren't about to do so. The
apparent reason for their collective murderousness is a belief that the
Houthis, as Shia Muslims, are some sort of advance strike force for Iran.
They don't often say this out loud, and they have so far offered no
compelling evidence that Iran's involvement in Yemen is any more than a tiny
fraction of their own almost unlimited warfare. Basically, the attacks on
the Houthis and their allies are little more than internationally sanctioned
gang rape. That ugly reality gives the Saudi aggressors and their Yemeni
puppet government little incentive even to acknowledge just claims on the
other side, much less to make concessions to them. In Qatar (whose planes
also bomb Yemen), the Yemeni Prime-Minister-in exile recently made his
side's intransigence and willingness to rely on force clear, as far as any
talks go:
Despite the optimism, and based on our experience, the talks won't be easy..
We are seeking to reach peaceful solutions but the stick will remain to
achieve what could not be achieved in the talks.
At the same time the talks began in Switzerland, the parties had agreed to
start a seven-day ceasefire in Yemen on December 15. So far, the ceasefire
has held, sort of, with both sides reporting violations on the ground. The
Saudi side has continued some air strikes (killing at least 15) but says
Houthi violations may cause the talks to collapse. An exchange of several
hundred prisoners on each side in Yemen was held up by al-Baydah tribesmen
and then apparently carried out. The Houthis continue to hold members and
relatives of the government-in-exile in Saudi Arabia. Saudi planes and
gunboats have attacked targets in the north daily since the ceasefire began.
By the time anyone reads this, the ceasefire may be over in principle as
well as in fact.
It's not a ceasefire for everybody in Yemen anyway. ISIS continues to fight
for control of Aden. On December 17, ISIS claimed credit for the suicide
car-bomb that killed the governor of Aden, installed by the Saudi-backed
Yemeni government after the Saudi-coalition re-took Aden from the Houthis
last July. ISIS referred to the Saudi-back governor as a "tyrant." Not far
from Aden, al Qaeda recently took over two other cities. Both ISIS and al
Qaeda have benefitted from the US-back Saudi obsession with the Shia
Houthis. As the crazies in and out of US government call for more and more
war in the Middle East, the pointlessness and incoherence of American policy
becomes so stark it's a wonder so few people seem to notice. Killing people
by the millions failed for 20 years in Indo-China, why does anyone expect it
to work in the Middle East?
Like Spain in 1936, Yemen has a civil war in which foreign countries,
especially the US, have intervened militarily against no effective military
opposition. US military officers meet daily with Saudi military officers in
Riyadh, where together they plan the next massacre in the defenseless
killing ground. Yemen was the poorest country in the region even before the
richest country in the region (Saudi Arabia) joined with the richest country
in the world (US) in an all too literal war on poverty. And mostly, except
for organizations like Democracy NOW, this unrelenting horror goes
unreported in the gaseous media cloud of promoting and tut-tutting Donald
Trump and other distracting irrelevancies.
Yemen today resembles Spain in the thirties in another respect: it is a
real-world test zone for advanced Western weaponry. Amnesty International
and other human rights groups have documented how the UK government's
illegal sale of advanced weapons to Saudi Arabia end up killing civilians in
Yemen (like the British cruise missile that destroyed a ceramics factory).
And it's hardly limited to the UK. Saudis buy billions of dollars of weapons
from the US and anyone else who's selling. The US and others sell the Saudis
internationally-banned cluster bombs. The Saudis drop them on Yemen.
Business is booming.
And Saudi Arabia says it has pledges from 34 governments to join a new
Islamic coalition to fight terrorism. How many of these governments, like
Saudi Arabia, rule their countries by terror? Think about it. The leader of
the coalition carrying out massive terror-bombing in Yemen is going to lead
another coalition in counterterrorism. This could go on forever. Sweet.
________________________________________
William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV,
print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont
judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination
from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
A Houthi Shiite fighter stands guard on Thursday as people search for
survivors under the rubble of houses destroyed by Saudi airstrikes near
Sanaa Airport. (photo: AP)
http://readersupportednews.org/http://readersupportednews.org/
Endless War Crimes in Yemen Slowed by Ceasefire
By William Boardman, Reader Supported News
18 December 15
Saudi Arabia's Yemen has a fascist whiff of Franco's Spain circa 1936
he first lie about Yemen's dirty war in the world of official journalism is
that the fighting there has been a "nine-month conflict" and that "the
conflict started in March," as the New York Times put it on December 17.
This is simply not true in any meaningful sense. What started in March was a
savage, one-sided air war backed by the US, all too similar to the
Nazi-backed one-sided air war in Spain in the thirties that gave the world
"Guernica" (back when the Nazis and the Saudis were chummy). Yemen's civil
war has already lasted decades, on and off. And Yemen has an even longer
history of conflict (all of which the Times knows, without letting
perspective clarify its reporting). For decades at least, Yemen has suffered
from chronic foreign interventions and manipulations, none of which have
brought much peace to the Yemeni people, who live in one of the oldest
civilized regions of the world.
The illegal, brutal war that goes unspoken (except as a "nine-month conflict
that started in March") is the genocidal bombing of Yemen by Saudi Arabia
and its mostly Sunni-Arab allies. This is essentially a rolling war crime of
unending dimension, all supported materially, tactically, and unjustly by
the US. The US is at war (the naval blockade alone is an act of war) with
Yemen, on the side of the aggressors, and Congress doesn't seem to know
about it, presidential candidates fail to talk about it, the media report it
little but dishonestly, and the nation stumbles on in bloody silence as its
moral numbness deepens.
The sides in Yemen (there are at least four) are complicated, but the main
axis of conflict is between the Houthis (and elements of the Yemeni
government) and the remnants of the Yemeni government driven into exile by
the Houthis, triggering the Saudi bombing campaign. The Houthis are an
indigenous, tribal, Zaidi Shia Muslim population in northwest Yemen that has
been in rebellion since 2004. They live in a region where people have lived
continuously for more than 7,000 years. The Yemeni government in exile has
only a veneer of legitimacy, having been installed by a foreign alliance
(including Saudi Arabia) and confirmed in an election without opposition.
Neither side is particularly savory. A purported Houthi logo reads: "God is
Great, Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse on the Jews, Victory to
Islam." Saudi Arabia is an intolerant police state that has promoted
fundamentalist Sunni jihad and counts ISIS among its allies in Yemen. These
people, one way and another, have been at each other's throats for
centuries.
Periodic peace talks put off mass starvation among Yemeni civilians
The possibility of good news recently was that peace talks began on December
15 at an undisclosed location in Switzerland, mediated by the UN special
envoy for Yemen, Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. He reportedly facilitated an
exchange by shuttling back and forth between the parties, working on issues
as a middleman as long as the parties remain unwilling to talk directly. The
talks are "aimed at establishing a permanent and comprehensive ceasefire,"
according to the UN. Previous talks in June and September have produced only
marginal benefits, mostly allowing humanitarian aid to be distributed to a
population close to starvation and without a medical system (the Saudis have
bombed hospitals). Whether the talks can do more than minimally relieve some
suffering is doubtful, since the Saudi side has shown no willingness to
negotiate anything but the terms of Houthi surrender.
The role of the UN is self-contradictory in Yemen. UN aid agencies are
trying to save as many civilian lives as possible (about 6,000 have died in
the conflict so far, roughly half of them civilians) and the UN special
envoy is trying to find a negotiated settlement. The UN Security Council has
made a negotiated settlement all but impossible by passing in April, in the
midst of the Saudi-led war in violation of international law, a resolution
that virtually calls for the Houthis to surrender and disarm, with no
provision for their security. Resolution 2216 in effect applauds the
Saudi-led indiscriminate bombing of Yemen (the exact, Orwellian language is
"commending its engagement" [emphasis in original]). Resolution 2216
essentially blames the Houthis for everything:
such actions taken by the Houthis [that] undermine the political transition
process in Yemen, and jeopardize the security, stability, sovereignty and
unity of Yemen.
Unity of Yemen is a fantasy. Sovereignty of Yemen has been violated by
anyone who wants to, including the Saudis, al Qaeda, ISIS (the Islamic
State), and the US, first with drone assassinations, now with the Saudi-led
war. Security in Yemen has been little more than a random hope for years,
not least because of US civilian-killing drones. If the political transition
process in Yemen had been more than political myth-making, the Houthis'
interests would have been respected and peace preserved. Resolution 2216:
Calls on all parties to comply with their obligations under international
law, including applicable international humanitarian law and human rights
law.
The resolution passed without dissent (Russia abstained) with some countries
voting for compliance with laws they were openly violating in their
participation in the Saudi-led war. While singling out the Houthis for
blame, US Representative to the UN Samantha Power omitted mention of US
participation in the bombing campaign and naval blockade. She managed to
express the full absurdity of a resolution divorced from reality, when she
said that:
The resolution also recognized the costs of the rapidly deteriorating
humanitarian crisis. A consensus agreement of all political parties was the
only way forward; the United Nations must continue its efforts in that
light.
Continuing to talk about talking allows bombing to go on unimpeded
The most obvious way to alleviate the humanitarian crisis, even back in
April, was to stop bombing and lift the blockade. It wasn't going to happen.
It hasn't happened.
Those who might do most to quell the carnage aren't about to do so. The
apparent reason for their collective murderousness is a belief that the
Houthis, as Shia Muslims, are some sort of advance strike force for Iran.
They don't often say this out loud, and they have so far offered no
compelling evidence that Iran's involvement in Yemen is any more than a tiny
fraction of their own almost unlimited warfare. Basically, the attacks on
the Houthis and their allies are little more than internationally sanctioned
gang rape. That ugly reality gives the Saudi aggressors and their Yemeni
puppet government little incentive even to acknowledge just claims on the
other side, much less to make concessions to them. In Qatar (whose planes
also bomb Yemen), the Yemeni Prime-Minister-in exile recently made his
side's intransigence and willingness to rely on force clear, as far as any
talks go:
Despite the optimism, and based on our experience, the talks won't be easy..
We are seeking to reach peaceful solutions but the stick will remain to
achieve what could not be achieved in the talks.
At the same time the talks began in Switzerland, the parties had agreed to
start a seven-day ceasefire in Yemen on December 15. So far, the ceasefire
has held, sort of, with both sides reporting violations on the ground. The
Saudi side has continued some air strikes (killing at least 15) but says
Houthi violations may cause the talks to collapse. An exchange of several
hundred prisoners on each side in Yemen was held up by al-Baydah tribesmen
and then apparently carried out. The Houthis continue to hold members and
relatives of the government-in-exile in Saudi Arabia. Saudi planes and
gunboats have attacked targets in the north daily since the ceasefire began.
By the time anyone reads this, the ceasefire may be over in principle as
well as in fact.
It's not a ceasefire for everybody in Yemen anyway. ISIS continues to fight
for control of Aden. On December 17, ISIS claimed credit for the suicide
car-bomb that killed the governor of Aden, installed by the Saudi-backed
Yemeni government after the Saudi-coalition re-took Aden from the Houthis
last July. ISIS referred to the Saudi-back governor as a "tyrant." Not far
from Aden, al Qaeda recently took over two other cities. Both ISIS and al
Qaeda have benefitted from the US-back Saudi obsession with the Shia
Houthis. As the crazies in and out of US government call for more and more
war in the Middle East, the pointlessness and incoherence of American policy
becomes so stark it's a wonder so few people seem to notice. Killing people
by the millions failed for 20 years in Indo-China, why does anyone expect it
to work in the Middle East?
Like Spain in 1936, Yemen has a civil war in which foreign countries,
especially the US, have intervened militarily against no effective military
opposition. US military officers meet daily with Saudi military officers in
Riyadh, where together they plan the next massacre in the defenseless
killing ground. Yemen was the poorest country in the region even before the
richest country in the region (Saudi Arabia) joined with the richest country
in the world (US) in an all too literal war on poverty. And mostly, except
for organizations like Democracy NOW, this unrelenting horror goes
unreported in the gaseous media cloud of promoting and tut-tutting Donald
Trump and other distracting irrelevancies.
Yemen today resembles Spain in the thirties in another respect: it is a
real-world test zone for advanced Western weaponry. Amnesty International
and other human rights groups have documented how the UK government's
illegal sale of advanced weapons to Saudi Arabia end up killing civilians in
Yemen (like the British cruise missile that destroyed a ceramics factory).
And it's hardly limited to the UK. Saudis buy billions of dollars of weapons
from the US and anyone else who's selling. The US and others sell the Saudis
internationally-banned cluster bombs. The Saudis drop them on Yemen.
Business is booming.
And Saudi Arabia says it has pledges from 34 governments to join a new
Islamic coalition to fight terrorism. How many of these governments, like
Saudi Arabia, rule their countries by terror? Think about it. The leader of
the coalition carrying out massive terror-bombing in Yemen is going to lead
another coalition in counterterrorism. This could go on forever. Sweet.
William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV,
print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont
judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation
for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination
from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
http://e-max.it/posizionamento-siti-web/socialize
